Filipa Lebre

Dr. Filipa Lebre


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 June 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFilipa Lebre
Filipa Lebre
RSRukmani Sridharan
Rukmani Sridharan
MSMichael J. Sawkins
Michael J. Sawkins
DKDaniel Kelly
Daniel Kelly
FOFergal J. O’bRien
Fergal J. O’bRien
ELEdward Lavelle
Edward Lavelle
The extent of regeneration following biomaterial implantation is dependent on the microenvironment surrounding the implant. Since implant composition can have a profound effect on inflammation, it is essential to understand this process as a non-resolving inflammatory response can lead to fibrous encapsulation and insufficient integration. Incorporation of particulates into implants confers structural and functional benefits, thus optimizing particulate characteristics to enhance immune mediated efficacy is important. We investigated the relationship between the nature of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and the innate immune response, focusing on how particle size (0.1 µm, 5 µm, 20 µm, 100 µm) and morphology (needle-shaped/spherical; smooth/rough surface) modulates inflammatory responses. We observed a shape and size-dependent activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β secretion; while needle-shaped and smaller HA particles significantly enhanced cytokine secretion, larger particles did not. Moreover, HA particle characteristics profoundly influenced patterns of innate immune cell recruitment and cytokine production following injection. While small, needle-shaped particles induced a strong inflammatory response, this was not observed with smooth, spherical particles of comparable size or with larger particles. These findings indicate that hydroxyapatite particle characteristics dictate immune cell recruitment and the ensuing inflammatory response, providing an opportunity to tailor HA particle characteristics to regulate immune responses induced after biomaterial implantation.

12 January 2016 in Molecular Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FLFilipa Lebre
Filipa Lebre
GBG. Borchard
G. Borchard
Henrique FanecaHenrique Faneca
Henrique Faneca
MLMaria Monteiro Pedroso De Lima
Maria Monteiro Pedroso De Lima
OBOlga Borges
Olga Borges

11 May 2016 in Advanced Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FLFilipa Lebre
Filipa Lebre
CHClaire H. Hearnden
Claire H. Hearnden
ELEdward Lavelle
Edward Lavelle

3 April 2017 in 2D Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMCaroline Moore
Caroline Moore
DMDania Movia
Dania Movia
RSRonan J Smith
Ronan J Smith
DHDamien Hanlon
Damien Hanlon
FLFilipa Lebre
Filipa Lebre
JMJennifer McIntyre
Jennifer McIntyre
The recent surge in graphene research, since its liquid phase monolayer isolation and characterization in 2004, has led to advancements which are accelerating the exploration of alternative 2D materials such as molybdenum disulphide (MoS2), whose unique physico-chemical properties can be exploited in applications ranging from cutting edge electronic devices to nanomedicine. However, to assess any potential impact on human health and the environment, the need to understand the bio-interaction of MoS2 at a cellular and sub-cellular level is critical. Notably, it is important to assess such potential impacts of materials which are produced by large scale production techniques, rather than research grade materials. The aim of this study was to explore cytotoxicity, cellular uptake and inflammatory responses in established cell-lines that mimic different potential exposure routes (inhalation, A549; ingestion, AGS; monocyte, THP-1) following incubation with MoS2 flakes of varying sizes (50 nm, 117 nm and 177 nm), produced by liquid phase exfoliation. Using high content screening (HCS) and Live/Dead assays, it was established that 1 µg ml−1 (for the three different MoS2 sizes) did not induce toxic effects on any of the cell-lines. Confocal microscopy images revealed a normal cellular morphology in all cases. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) confirmed the uptake of all MoS2 nanomaterials in all the cell-lines, the MoS2 ultimately locating in single membrane vesicles. At such sub-lethal doses, inflammatory responses are observed, however, associated, at least partially, with the presence of lipopolysaccharide endotoxin in nanomaterial suspensions and surfactant samples. Therefore, the inflammatory response of the cells to the MoS2 or endotoxin contamination was interrogated using a 10-plex ELISA which illustrates cytokine production. The experiments carried out using wild-type and endotoxin hyporesponsive bone marrow derived dendritic cells confirmed that the inflammatory responses result from a combination of endotoxin contamination, the MoS2 nanomaterials themselves, and the stabilizing surfactant.

1 December 2009 in Pharmaceutical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OBOlga Borges
Olga Borges
FLFilipa Lebre
Filipa Lebre
DBDulce Bento
Dulce Bento
GBGerrit Borchard
Gerrit Borchard
HJHans E. Junginger
Hans E. Junginger
It has long been known that protection against pathogens invading the organism via mucosal surfaces correlates better with the presence of specific antibodies in local secretions than with serum antibodies. The most effective way to induce mucosal immunity is to administer antigens directly to the mucosal surface. The development of vaccines for mucosal application requires antigen delivery systems and immunopotentiators that efficiently facilitate the presentation of the antigen to the mucosal immune system. This review provides an overview of the events within mucosal tissues that lead to protective mucosal immune responses. The understanding of those biological mechanisms, together with knowledge of the technology of vaccines and adjuvants, provides guidance on important technical aspects of mucosal vaccine design. Not being exhaustive, this review also provides information related to modern adjuvants, including polymeric delivery systems and immunopotentiators.

25 May 2022 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFilipa Lebre
Filipa Lebre
NCNivedita Chatterjee
Nivedita Chatterjee
Samantha CostaSamantha Costa
Samantha Costa
EFEli Fernández-De-Gortari
Eli Fernández-De-Gortari
CLCarla Lopes
Carla Lopes
Ernesto Alfaro-MorenoErnesto Alfaro-Moreno
Ernesto Alfaro-Moreno
The use of nanomaterials has been increasing in recent times, and they are widely used in industries such as cosmetics, drugs, food, water treatment, and agriculture. The rapid development of new nanomaterials demands a set of approaches to evaluate the potential toxicity and risks related to them. In this regard, nanosafety has been using and adapting already existing methods (toxicological approach), but the unique characteristics of nanomaterials demand new approaches (nanotoxicology) to fully understand the potential toxicity, immunotoxicity, and (epi)genotoxicity. In addition, new technologies, such as organs-on-chips and sophisticated sensors, are under development and/or adaptation. All the information generated is used to develop new in silico approaches trying to predict the potential effects of newly developed materials. The overall evaluation of nanomaterials from their production to their final disposal chain is completed using the life cycle assessment (LCA), which is becoming an important element of nanosafety considering sustainability and environmental impact. In this review, we give an overview of all these elements of nanosafety.