Nivedita Chatterjee

Dr. Nivedita Chatterjee

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNivedita Chatterjee
Nivedita Chatterjee
HEHyun-Jeong Eom
Hyun-Jeong Eom
JCJinhee Choi
Jinhee Choi

1 August 2014 in Toxicology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HEHyun-Jeong Eom
Hyun-Jeong Eom
NCNivedita Chatterjee
Nivedita Chatterjee
JLJeongsoo Lee
Jeongsoo Lee
JCJinhee Choi
Jinhee Choi

24 October 2014 in Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNivedita Chatterjee
Nivedita Chatterjee
JYJiSu Yang
JiSu Yang
HKHyun-Mi Kim
Hyun-Mi Kim
EJEunhye Jo
Eunhye Jo
PKPhil-Je Kim
Phil-Je Kim
JCJinhee Choi
Jinhee Choi
The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro (human bronchial epithelial cells, BEAS2B cells) and in vivo (the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, C. elegans) toxicity outcomes following exposure to pristine as well as surface-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) following hydroxylation-oxygenation (O+), amination (NH2), or carboxylation (COOH) of the carbon nanotubes (CNT). Cell viability and proliferation were measured by Ez-Cytox, trypan blue exclusion, and colony formation assays. The genotoxic potential of the MWCNT was determined by using the alkaline comet assay. In addition, survival and reproduction were used as endpoints for detection of toxicity of MWCNT in C. elegans. The carboxylated (COOH)-MWCNT was found most toxic as evidenced by cytotoxic and genotoxic among all tested compounds. The order of sensitivity was COOH > O+ > NH2 > pristine. There were almost no marked changes in survival following exposure of C. elegans to MWCNT. It is of interest that only pristine MWCNT exerted significant reduction in reproductive capacity of C. elegans. Surface functionalization significantly influenced the bioactivity of MWCNT, which displayed species as well as target-organ specificity. The mechanisms underlying these specific modes of nano-biological interactions need to be elucidated.

21 December 2016 in Nanotoxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNivedita Chatterjee
Nivedita Chatterjee
YKYoungho Kim
Youngho Kim
JYJisu Yang
Jisu Yang
CRCarlos P. Roca
Carlos P. Roca
SJSang-Woo Joo
Sang-Woo Joo
JCJinhee Choi
Jinhee Choi
The potential hazards of graphene nanomaterials were investigated by exposing the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The underlying mechanisms of the nano–bio interaction were addressed with an integrated systems toxicology approach using global transcriptomics, network-based pathway analysis, and experimental validation of the in-silico-derived hypotheses. Graphene oxide was found to reduce the worms’ reproductive health to a greater degree than rGO, but it did not affect survival (24 h endpoint). Comparative analysis of GO vs. rGO effects found that the wingless-type MMTV integration site family (Wnt) pathway and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway were evoked in GO- but not in rGO-exposed worms. We therefore hypothesized that crosstalk between the Wnt and MAPK pathways is responsible for C. elegans’ reproductive sensitivity to GO exposure. By targeting the individual components of the Wnt-MAPK crosstalk pathway (with qPCR gene expression and mutant reproduction analysis), we found a signaling cascade of MOM-2 → MOM-5 → MOM-4 → LIT-1 → POP-1 → EGL-5. Specifically, the activation of POP-1 (the TCF protein homolog) and subsequent repression of the Wnt/β-catenin target gene (EGL-5), analyzed with target-gene-specific RNAi in POP-1 mutant [pop-1(q645)] worms, were the central mechanisms of reduced reproductive potential in the worms exposed to GO. Our results highlight the distinct biological and molecular mechanisms of GO and rGO exposure and the role of Wnt-MAPK pathway crosstalk in regulating GO-induced reproductive failure in in vivo systems, and they will contribute to the development of efficient and innocuous graphene applications as well to improvements in mechanism-based risk assessment.


25 May 2022 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFilipa Lebre
Filipa Lebre
NCNivedita Chatterjee
Nivedita Chatterjee
Samantha CostaSamantha Costa
Samantha Costa
EFEli Fernández-De-Gortari
Eli Fernández-De-Gortari
CLCarla Lopes
Carla Lopes
Ernesto Alfaro-MorenoErnesto Alfaro-Moreno
Ernesto Alfaro-Moreno
The use of nanomaterials has been increasing in recent times, and they are widely used in industries such as cosmetics, drugs, food, water treatment, and agriculture. The rapid development of new nanomaterials demands a set of approaches to evaluate the potential toxicity and risks related to them. In this regard, nanosafety has been using and adapting already existing methods (toxicological approach), but the unique characteristics of nanomaterials demand new approaches (nanotoxicology) to fully understand the potential toxicity, immunotoxicity, and (epi)genotoxicity. In addition, new technologies, such as organs-on-chips and sophisticated sensors, are under development and/or adaptation. All the information generated is used to develop new in silico approaches trying to predict the potential effects of newly developed materials. The overall evaluation of nanomaterials from their production to their final disposal chain is completed using the life cycle assessment (LCA), which is becoming an important element of nanosafety considering sustainability and environmental impact. In this review, we give an overview of all these elements of nanosafety.