Sarah E.J. Arnold

Dr. Sarah E.J. Arnold

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2010 in American Journal of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAmy E. Zanne
Amy E. Zanne
MWMark Westoby
Mark Westoby
DFDaniel S. Falster
Daniel S. Falster
DADavid D. Ackerly
David D. Ackerly
SLScott R. Loarie
Scott R. Loarie
DCDavid A. Coomes
David A. Coomes
Woody stems comprise a large biological carbon fraction and determine water transport between roots and leaves; their structure and function can influence both carbon and hydrological cycles. While angiosperm wood anatomy and density determine hydraulic conductivity and mechanical strength, little is known about interrelations across many species. We compiled a global data set comprising two anatomical traits for 3005 woody angiosperms: mean vessel lumen area (Ā) and number per unit area (N). From these, we calculated vessel lumen fraction (F = ĀN) and size to number ratio (S = Ā/N), a new vessel composition index. We examined the extent to which F and S influenced potential sapwood specific stem conductivity (KS) and wood density (D; dry mass/fresh volume). F and S varied essentially independently across angiosperms. Variation in KS was driven primarily by S, and variation in D was virtually unrelated to F and S. Tissue density outside vessel lumens (DN) must predominantly influence D. High S should confer faster KS but incur greater freeze–thaw embolism risk. F should also affect KS, and both F and DN should influence mechanical strength, capacitance, and construction costs. Improved theory and quantification are needed to better understand ecological costs and benefits of these three distinct dimensions.

2 August 2006 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ADAdrian G. Dyer
Adrian G. Dyer
HWHeather M. Whitney
Heather M. Whitney
SASarah E.J. Arnold
Sarah E.J. Arnold
BGBeverley J. Glover
Beverley J. Glover
LCLars Chittka
Lars Chittka

10 December 2010 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASarah E.J. Arnold
Sarah E.J. Arnold
SFSamia Faruq
Samia Faruq
VSVincent Savolainen
Vincent Savolainen
PMPeter W. McOwan
Peter W. McOwan
LCLars Chittka
Lars Chittka
Flower colour is of great importance in various fields relating to floral biology and pollinator behaviour. However, subjective human judgements of flower colour may be inaccurate and are irrelevant to the ecology and vision of the flower's pollinators. For precise, detailed information about the colours of flowers, a full reflectance spectrum for the flower of interest should be used rather than relying on such human assessments. The Floral Reflectance Database (FReD) has been developed to make an extensive collection of such data available to researchers. It is freely available at http://www.reflectance.co.uk. The database allows users to download spectral reflectance data for flower species collected from all over the world. These could, for example, be used in modelling interactions between pollinator vision and plant signals, or analyses of flower colours in various habitats. The database contains functions for calculating flower colour loci according to widely-used models of bee colour space, reflectance graphs of the spectra and an option to search for flowers with similar colours in bee colour space. The Floral Reflectance Database is a valuable new tool for researchers interested in the colours of flowers and their association with pollinator colour vision, containing raw spectral reflectance data for a large number of flower species.

17 February 2009 in Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASarah E.J. Arnold
Sarah E.J. Arnold
VSVincent Savolainen
Vincent Savolainen
LCLars Chittka
Lars Chittka

21 June 2014 in Journal of Chemical Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASarah E.J. Arnold
Sarah E.J. Arnold
MIM. Eduardo Peralta Idrovo
M. Eduardo Peralta Idrovo
LALuis J. Lomas Arias
Luis J. Lomas Arias
Steven R BelmainSteven R Belmain
Steven R Belmain
Phil StevensonPhil Stevenson
Phil Stevenson

28 November 2019 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPrisila A. Mkenda
Prisila A. Mkenda
PNPatrick A. Ndakidemi
Patrick A. Ndakidemi
EMErnest Mbega
Ernest Mbega
Phil StevensonPhil Stevenson
Phil Stevenson
SASarah E.J. Arnold
Sarah E.J. Arnold
Steven R BelmainSteven R Belmain
Steven R Belmain
Background: Field margin and non-crop vegetation in agricultural systems are potential ecosystem services providers because they offer semi-natural habitats for both below and above ground animal groups such as soil organisms, small mammals, birds and arthropods that are service supplying units. They are considered as a target area for enhancing farm biodiversity.Methodology: To explore the multiple potential benefits of these semi-natural habitats and to identify research trends and knowledge gaps globally, a review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 235 publications from the year 2000 to 2016 in the Scopus and Web of Science databases were reviewed.Results: The literature showed an increasing trend in the number of published articles over time with European studies leading in the proportion of studies conducted, followed by North America, Asia, South America, Africa and Australia. Several functional groups of organisms were studied from field margin and non-crop vegetation around agricultural lands including natural enemies (37%), insect pests (22%), birds (17%), pollinators (16%), soil macro fauna (4%) and small mammals (4%). Ecosystem services derived from the field margin included natural pest regulation, pollination, nutrient cycling and reduced offsite erosion. Some field margin plants were reported to host detrimental crop pests, a major ecosystem dis-service, potentially leading to increased pest infestation in the field.Conclusion: The majority of studies revealed the importance of field margin and non-crop vegetation around arable fields in enhancing ecosystem biodiversity. Promotion of field margin plants that selectively enhance the population of beneficial organisms would support sustainable food security rather than simply boosting plant diversity. Our analyses also highlight that agro-ecological studies remain largely overlooked in some regions.