William Curran

Dr. William Curran


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 December 2016 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFabian Menalled
Fabian Menalled
RPRobert Peterson
Robert Peterson
RSRichard Smith
Richard Smith
WCWilliam Curran
William Curran
DPDavid Paez
David Paez
BMBruce D Maxwell
Bruce D Maxwell
Modern weed science is at a crossroads. Born out of advances in chemistry, it has focused on minimizing weed competition with genetically uniform crops and heavy reliance on herbicides. Paradoxically, the success obtained with such an approach and the reluctance to conduct integrated and multidisciplinary research has resulted in unintended, but predictable, consequences, including the selection of herbicide resistant biotypes. Advances in eco-evolutionary biology, a relatively recent discipline that seeks to understand how local population dynamics arise from phenotypic variation resulting from natural selection, habitat distribution, and propagule dispersal across the landscape are transforming our understanding of the processes that regulate agroecosystems. Within this framework, complementary tactics to develop alternative weed management programs include the following: (1) weed scientists must recognize that evolution occurs within crop fields at ecologically-relevant time scales and is rooted in the inherent variation that exists in all populations; (2) weed management should recognize that the probability of a resistant mutant is directly related to the population size; (3) farmers need to acknowledge that herbicide resistance transcends any one farm and should coordinate local practices with regional actions; (4) incentives should be developed and implemented to help the adoption of eco-evolutionary management programs; and (5) risk analysis can help incorporate an eco-evolutionary perspective into integrated weed management programs.

6 September 2017 in Weed Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJohn Wallace
John Wallace
WCWilliam Curran
William Curran
SMSteven B. Mirsky
Steven B. Mirsky
MRMatthew Ryan
Matthew Ryan
In the mid-Atlantic region, there is increasing interest in the use of intercropping strategies to establish cover crops in corn cropping systems. However, intercropping may be limited by potential injury to cover crops from residual herbicide programs. Field experiments were conducted from 2013 to 2015 at Pennsylvania, Maryland, and New York locations (n=8) to evaluate the effect of common residual corn herbicides on interseeded red clover and annual ryegrass. Cover crop establishment and response to herbicide treatments varied across sites and years.S-metolachlor, pyroxasulfone, pendimethalin, and dimethenamid-Preduced annual ryegrass biomass relative to the nontreated check, whereas annual ryegrass biomass in acetochlor treatments was no different compared with the nontreated check. The rank order of observed annual ryegrass biomass reduction among chloroacetamide herbicides wasS-metolachlor>pyroxasulfone>dimethenamid-P>acetochlor. Annual ryegrass biomass was not reduced by any of the broadleaf control herbicides. Mesotrione reduced red clover biomass 80% compared to the nontreated check. No differences in red clover biomass were observed between saflufenacil, rimsulfuron and atrazine treatments compared to the nontreated check. Red clover was not reduced by any of the grass control herbicides. This research suggests that annual ryegrass and red clover can be successfully interseeded in silt loam soils of Pennsylvania following use of several shorter-lived residual corn herbicides, but further research is needed in areas with soil types other than silt loam or outside of the mid-Atlantic cropping region.

1 July 2001 in Weed Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WEWade R. Esbenshade
Wade R. Esbenshade
WCWilliam Curran
William Curran
GRGregory W. Roth
Gregory W. Roth
NHNathan L. Hartwig
Nathan L. Hartwig
MOMichael D. Orzolek
Michael D. Orzolek
An experiment examining the effect of burcucumber emergence date and corn competition on burcucumber fecundity was conducted in 1997 and 1998 in central Pennsylvania. Burcucumber seedlings were transplanted in the field in approximately 10-d intervals starting in late May through mid-August with or without competition from corn. Burcucumber plants grown without competition from corn produced 716 g dry matter and 4,500 seeds plant−1 in 1997 and 607 g dry matter and 1,800 seeds plant−1 in 1998. Biomass was greatest for plants established in late May, whereas seed production was greatest for plants established in mid-June. Although seed numbers were reduced in comparison to the May and June establishment periods, plants established as late as August still produced seed. Burcucumber established in corn produced 96% less dry matter and seed than the plants in a noncompetitive environment in both years of the study. Although the growth and seed production of burcucumber grown in corn was drastically reduced, plants established in mid-July still produced seed.

1 July 2007 in Weed Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDwight D. Lingenfelter
Dwight D. Lingenfelter
WCWilliam Curran
William Curran
Field and greenhouse studies examined glyphosate and several ACCase-inhibitor herbicides for control of wirestem muhly. A field study evaluated application rate and timing for control in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Herbicides were applied at two rates, 4 and 6 wk after planting (WAP) of soybean when wirestem muhly was about 30 and 50 cm tall, respectively. A complimentary greenhouse experiment with the same herbicides examined wirestem muhly rhizome viability 30 days after herbicide application. A second field study examined optimum glyphosate application timing for control of wirestem muhly during a fallow rotation period. Glyphosate was applied at 14-day intervals from mid-May through early October. In the first field study, glyphosate, fluazifop, and clethodim provided better control of wirestem muhly than sethoxydim and quizalofop. Clethodim, fluazifop, and glyphosate provided 74 to 92% control over both rates and application timings, whereas quizalofop and sethoxydim were the least effective, provi...

1 April 2001 in Weed Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WEWade R. Esbenshade
Wade R. Esbenshade
WCWilliam Curran
William Curran
GRGregory W. Roth
Gregory W. Roth
NHNathan L. Hartwig
Nathan L. Hartwig
MOMichael D. Orzolek
Michael D. Orzolek
An experiment was conducted in 1998 and 1999 in southeastern Pennsylvania to examine the effect of tillage and soybean row spacing on burcucumber emergence and growth. A second experiment evaluated postemergence (POST) soybean herbicides on burcucumber control. In the tillage and row spacing study, a glyphosate-resistant soybean variety was planted in no-till and reduced-tillage systems in 38- and 76-cm row spacings. In the POST herbicide experiment, chlorimuron, glyphosate, CGA-277476, thifensulfuron, and several combinations of these herbicides were applied at two different POST application timings in 38-cm row soybean planted in a reduced-tillage system. In the tillage and row spacing study, burcucumber emergence was greatest starting in late May through mid-June and mostly ceased by early July, regardless of tillage system or row spacing. Although there was no difference in germination period in either tillage system, preplant tillage increased the number of emerged plants by 110% in 1997 and 70% in 1998 compared to the no-till system. Row spacing had no effect on burcucumber emergence or biomass production. In general, most POST herbicide programs controlled burcucumber, and there was no difference between early POST and mid-POST application timings. Chlorimuron at 13 g ai/ha, chlorimuron plus thifensulfuron, glyphosate, glyphosate plus chlorimuron, and glyphosate plus CGA-277476 provided 87% or greater control of burcucumber 12 wk after planting. These herbicides reduced burcucumber density and biomass by more than 56% in 1997 and 96% in 1998. Nomenclature: CGA-277476 (proposed name, oxasulfuron), 2-[[[[[4,6-dimethyl-3-pyrimidinyl]amino]carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]benzoic acid, 3-oxetanyl-ester; chlorimuron; glyphosate; thifensulfuron; burcucumber, Sicyos angulatus L. #3 SIYAN; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Additional index words: Cultural control, emergence period, herbicide application timing, herbicide-resistant crops. Abbreviations: EPOST, early postemergence; GDD, growing degree days; LPOST, late postemergence; MPOST, mid-postemergence; POST, postemergence; WAP, weeks after planting.

15 November 2021 in Weed Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLauren M. Lazaro
Lauren M. Lazaro
LSLovreet Shergill
Lovreet Shergill
JEJeffrey A. Evans
Jeffrey A. Evans
MBMuthukumar Bagavathiannan
Muthukumar Bagavathiannan
SBShawn C. Beam
Shawn C. Beam
SMSteven B. Mirsky
Steven B. Mirsky
Seed retention, and ultimately seed shatter, are extremely important for the efficacy of harvest weed seed control (HWSC) and are likely influenced by various agroecological and environmental factors. Field studies investigated seed-shattering phenology of 22 weed species across three soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-producing regions in the United States. We further evaluated the potential drivers of seed shatter in terms of weather conditions, growing degree days, and plant biomass. Based on the results, weather conditions had no consistent impact on weed seed shatter. However, there was a positive correlation between individual weed plant biomass and delayed weed seed–shattering rates during harvest. This work demonstrates that HWSC can potentially reduce weed seedbank inputs of plants that have escaped early-season management practices and retained seed through harvest. However, smaller individuals of plants within the same population that shatter seed before harvest pose a risk of escaping early-season management and HWSC.