Similar to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the pathogenesis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases includes cytokines dysregulation and increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Although current data from international studies suggest that rheumatic diseases are associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 infection and worse outcomes, there is limited literature in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes and length of hospital stay of COVID-19 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Saudi Arabia. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study that included 122 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and documented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection from 2019 to 2021. Patients with suspected COVID-19 infection, non-inflammatory diseases, such as osteoarthritis, or inflammatory diseases but without or with weak systemic involvement, such as gout, were excluded. The vast majority (81.1%) of the patients were females. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common primary rheumatological diagnosis. The admission rate was 34.5% with an overall mortality rate of 11.5%. Number of episodes of COVID-19 infection, mechanical ventilation, cytokine storm syndrome, secondary bacterial infection, number of comorbidities, rituximab, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure were significantly associated with a longer hospital stay. Additionally, hypertension, heart failure, rituximab, mechanical ventilation, cytokine storm syndrome, and secondary bacterial infection were significantly associated with higher mortality. Predictors of longer hospitalization were obesity, number of episodes of COVID-19 infection, mechanical ventilation, number of comorbidities, and chronic kidney disease, whereas, hypertension was the only predictor of mortality. Obesity, number of episodes of COVID-19 infection, mechanical ventilation, number of comorbidities, and chronic kidney disease were significantly associated with higher odds of longer hospitalization, whereas, hypertension was significantly associated with higher odds of mortality. We recommend that these patients should be prioritized for the COVID-19 vaccine booster doses, and rituximab should be avoided unless its benefit clearly outweighs its risk.

Introduction: Patients receiving rituximab (RTX) may be at increased risk for severe Coronavirus infections and worse outcomes compared with the general population. Because of the conflicting results concerning the effect of RTX on the clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19 infection, we aimed to share our experience with 35 patients infected with COVID-19 while treated with RTX for a variety of clinical indications. Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study that included 35 patients. All patients aged ≥ 14 years who were treated with RTX for various conditions and were found to have COVID-19 infection were included. Patients with poor outcomes or patients with suspected COVID-19 infection were excluded. Results: The patients’ mean age was 42.8 ± 16.3 years with an average BMI of 29.9 ± 11.4 kg/m². Over half (51.4%, n = 18) of the patients received RTX at a dose of 375 mg/m2 with a median frequency of 4 doses. More than a third (37.1%, n = 13) of the patients had hypogammaglobulinemia and 25.7% had low CD19. Over a third (42.9%, n= 15) of the patients required hospitalization and almost a third (25.7%, n = 9) required treatment in the intensive care unit. There was a statistically significant association between intensive care unit admission and age, steroid use, and low CD19. The mortality rate was 25.7%, and it was significantly higher in elderly, diabetics, corticosteroid users, patients who were hospitalized, treated in the intensive care unit, and had low immunoglobin or CD19. Conclusion: Treatment with RTX seems to be a potential risk factor for unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients. RTX should be used with caution or avoided unless the benefit clearly outweighs the risk.

Background: In Saudi Arabia (SA), there has been an alarming increase in the prevalence of chronic kidney diseases (CKD) over the last three decades. Despite being one of the largest countries in the Middle East, renal conditions remain understudied, and there is limited data on their epidemiology and outcomes in SA. Objectives: To document the experience of establishing a local renal registry assessing the epidemiology of CKD and identifying potential areas for improving the quality and delivery of care for CKD patients. Methods: This is a multi-center retrospective registry. Potential participants were identified through the ICD-10 codes from five hospitals serving the National Guard affiliates in SA. Patients aged ≥ 18 years treated in any National Guard hospital since 2010 for glomerulonephritis, CKD, or received hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or renal transplant were enrolled. Once enrolled in the registry, patients were followed to the last visit date. RedCap was used to create and host the online registry platform. Results: A total of 2,912 patients were included, and more than half were younger than 60 years old. Two-thirds of the patients were overweight (25%) or obese (37%). Glomerulonephritis was diagnosed in 10% of the patients, and dialysis-dependent and kidney transplant patients accounted for 31.4% and 24.4%, respectively. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were detected among 52% and 43% of the participants, respectively. Hemodialysis was the most prevalent dialysis method, with patients spending 3.6 ± 0.4 h per session to receive this treatment. One in every five participants had a kidney biopsy taken (21%). Several barriers and facilitators of the success of this registry were identified. Conclusions: The KIND registry provides much-needed information about CKD in Saudi Arabia and serves as a model for future projects investigating the natural history and progression of the spectrum of renal diseases. Logistic and financial challenges to the sustainability of registries are identified and discussed.

Endocarditis is an extremely rare complication of Salmonellosis with an incidence of 0.2–0.4%. It is a destructive and invasive infection that follows a highly complicated course and carries a high mortality rate that exceeds 45%. Multiple predisposing factors for Salmonella endocarditis have been described in the literature, including human immunodeficiency virus infection, congenital heart diseases, and the presence of a prosthetic valve. Herein, we report a case of Salmonella prosthetic valve endocarditis complicated by splenic infarction and aortic pseudoaneurysm presenting as a month-long history of fluctuating fever, chills, and rigors, accompanied by occasional cough and shortness of breath in a 55-year-old female with aortic and mitral valves replacement and multiple comorbidities. She was diagnosed by multiple radiographic studies and successfully treated with the Commando procedure and a long course of IV antibiotics.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is classically described as a triad of nonimmune hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Atypical HUS (aHUS) is a rare variant of the disease, and it accounts for 5–10% of the cases. It has a poor prognosis, with a mortality rate exceeding 25% and a more than 50% chance of progressing into end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Genetic or acquired dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway is highly implicated in the pathogenesis of aHUS. Multiple triggers for aHUS have been described in the literature, including pregnancy, transplantation, vaccination, and viral infections. Herein, we report a case of a previously healthy 38-year-old male who developed microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and severe kidney impairment one week after receiving the first dose of AstraZeneca SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. A diagnosis of aHUS was made after excluding other causes of thrombotic microangiopathies. Treatment with plasma exchange, prednisone, and rituximab (375 mg/m²) once weekly for four doses resulted in improvement of his hematological parameters. However, he progressed to ESKD.

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) using level 1 evidence. Methods: The Cochrane and PubMed databases were searched from inception until January 1, 2022. RCTs that studied the efficacy and safety of DPP-4 inhibitors in diabetic patients with CKD were included. The primary efficacy outcome was assessed as the mean difference between HbA1c at the beginning and the end of each study for each arm, and the primary safety outcome was assessed as the incidence of adverse events and severe adverse events in each study. Results: Twenty-one studies satisfied the pre-defined eligibility criteria. In assessing the efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors in the treatment of T2DM and CKD, a total of 2917 patients under the DPP-4 inhibitors group and 2377 patients under the control group were included; The mean difference between the HbA1c of DPP-4 Inhibitor and the control group was − 0.5295 with a 95% CI of − 0.5337 to − 0.5252. The included studies had high heterogeneity p < 0.00001 and I² = 99%. In assessing the safety outcome and tolerability of DPP-4 inhibitors, a total of 8138 patients under the DPP-4 inhibitors group and 7517 patients under the control group were included; the odds ratio of adverse events between both groups was 0.9967 with a 95% CI of 0.9967 to 1.1047. The included studies had low heterogeneity p = 0.25 and I² = 15%. The overall effect, Z = 0.06 (p = 0.95), was insignificant. Conclusion: Patients suffering from both T2DM and CKD exhibited a significantly enhanced glycemic control when treated with DPP-4 inhibitors in comparison to the control group. Furthermore, no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between the DPP-4 inhibitors and the control group.