Purpose. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in the first 6 months after renal transplantation, and there are only limited data about UTIs after transplantation in Saudi Arabia in general. Methods. A retrospective study from January 2017 to May 2020 with 6-month follow-up. Results. 279 renal transplant recipients were included. Mean age was 43.4±16.0 years, and114 (40.9) were women. Urinary stents were inserted routinely during transplantation and were removed 35.3±28 days postoperatively. Ninety-seven patients (35) developed urinary tract infections (UTIs) in the first six months after renal transplantation. Of those who developed the first episode of UTI, the recurrence rates were 57, 27, and 14 for having one, two, or three recurrences, respectively. Late urinary stent removals, defined as more than 21 days postoperatively, tended to have more UTIs (OR: 1.43, P: 0.259, CI: 0.762.66). Age >40, female gender, history of neurogenic bladder, and transplantation abroad were statistically significant factors associated with UTIs and recurrence. Diabetes, level of immunosuppression, deceased donor renal transplantation, pretransplant residual urine volume, or history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was not associated with a higher incidence of UTIs. UTIs were asymptomatic in 60 but complicated with bacteremia in 6 of the cases. Multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) were the causative organisms in 42 of cases, and in-hospital treatment was required in about 50 of cases. Norfloxacin+Bactrim DD (160/800mg) every other day was not associated with the lower risk of developing UTIs compared to the standard prophylaxis daily Bactrim SS (80/400mg). Conclusion. UTIs and recurrence are common in the first 6 months after renal transplantation. Age >40, female gender, neurogenic bladder, and transplantation abroad are associated with the increased risk of UTIs and recurrence. MDROs are common causative organisms, and hospitalization is frequently required. Dual prophylactic antibiotics did not seem to be advantageous over the standard daily Bactrim.

Purpose. To evaluate the impact of early (3 weeks) urinary stent removal on urinary tract infections (UTIs) post renal transplantation. Methods. A retrospective study was performed including all adult renal transplants who were transplanted between January 2017 and May 2020 with a minimum of 6-month follow-up at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results. A total of 279 kidney recipients included in the study were stratified into 114 in the early stent removal group (ESR) and 165 in the late stent removal group (LSR). Mean age was 43.4 ± 15.8; women: n: 114, 40.90%; and deceased donor transplant: n: 55, 19.70%. Mean stent removal time was 35.3 ± 28.0 days posttransplant (14.1 ± 4.6 days in the ESR versus 49.9 ± 28.1 days in LSR, ). Seventy-four UTIs were diagnosed while the stents were in vivo or up to two weeks after the stent removal “UTIs related to the stent” (n = 20, 17.5% in ESR versus n = 54, 32.7% in LSR; ). By six months after transplantation, there were 97 UTIs (n = 36, 31.6% UTIs in ESR versus n = 61, 37% in LSR; ). Compared with UTIs diagnosed after stent removal, UTIs diagnosed while the stent was still in vivo tended to be complicated (17.9% versus 4.9%, : 0.019), recurrent (66.1% versus 46.3%; : 0.063), associated with bacteremia (10.7% versus 0%; : 0.019), and requiring hospitalization (61% versus 24%, : 0.024). Early stent removal decreased the need for expedited stent removal due to UTI reasons (rate of UTIs before stent removal) (n = 11, 9% in the early group versus n = 45, 27% in the late group; ). The effect on the rate of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) was less clear (33% versus 47%, : 0.205). Early stent removal was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of UTIs related to the stent (HR = 0.505, 95% CI: 0.302-0.844, ) without increasing the incidence of urological complications. Removing the stent before 21 days posttransplantation decreased UTIs related to stent (aOR: 0.403, CI: 0.218-0.744). Removing the stent before 14 days may even further decrease the risk of UTIs (aOR: 0.311, CI: 0.035- 2.726). Conclusion. Early ureteric stent removal defined as less than 21 days post renal transplantation reduced the incidence of UTIs related to stent without increasing the incidence of urological complications. UTIs occurring while the ureteric stent still in vivo were notably associated with bacteremia and hospitalization. A randomized trial will be required to further determine the best timing for stent removal.

Background The supply-demand mismatch between organ donor and patient waiting for transplant has led to the growth of transplant tourism. This type of transplant is considered unethical and illegal, as it is usually performed in poor environments and carries a higher risk of infectious, vascular, and immunological complications. Methods In this single-centered retrospective cohort study, we compared patients who underwent transplant tourism to patients who were transplanted locally and followed up in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018. Result A total of 254 local transplants and 60 patients from the transplant tourism group were included. Transplant tourism recipients were younger otherwise both groups were similar in gender, body mass index, diabetes, and hypertension. Recipients in the transplant tourism group had a significantly higher rate of delayed graft function (18.3% vs. 6.3%, p 0.005), acute rejection (40% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001), and higher posttransplant infection in general. With more urological complications and higher graft failure at 3-years' follow-up (11.7% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001). Conclusion Transplant tourism is associated with a higher risk of infection and poor graft outcomes. Extra efforts are required to cut down transplant tourism by educating patients about its clinical risk and ethical considerations. In addition, measures to increase the number of deceased donor pool to provide a better alternative options for patients are essential.

Background: Data on outcomes of renal transplantation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is limited. We describe renal transplant experience in one of the largest referral centers for renal transplants in KSA. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent kidney transplantation at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) from January 2016 to July 31, 2019, with at least one year of follow-up post-transplantation. Results: One hundred ninety-four individuals were identified and included in the analysis. The mean age of the renal transplant cohort was 45 years with an average pre-transplant body mass index of 26.1 kg/m². The most common comorbidities were hypertension (77.3%) and diabetes mellitus (34.5%). The most common etiology of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) was unknown (49.0%) followed by Lupus nephropathy (16.0%). Central venous catheters were the predominant dialysis access (56.2%). Living-related kidney donation was the commonest source of kidney transplantation (61.3%), followed by deceased donor renal transplantation (22.7%). Anti-thymocytes globulin (ATG) was the predominant induction agent (57.7%) and nearly all patients received tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression. Mean serum creatinine at the time of discharge was 109 umol/l. Delayed graft function was observed in 6.7% of our patients. The most common medical complications were urinary tract infection (26.3%). Post-transplant surgical complications occurred at a low rate. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a successful renal transplant experience among a relatively healthy cohort and identifies potential gaps, particularly the high rate of central venous catheters, the frequent lack of clear etiology of ESKD, the low rate of pre-emptive transplant, and deceased donors. Further studies are needed to evaluate and close these gaps.

Background: In Saudi Arabia (SA), there has been an alarming increase in the prevalence of chronic kidney diseases (CKD) over the last three decades. Despite being one of the largest countries in the Middle East, renal conditions remain understudied, and there is limited data on their epidemiology and outcomes in SA. Objectives: To document the experience of establishing a local renal registry assessing the epidemiology of CKD and identifying potential areas for improving the quality and delivery of care for CKD patients. Methods: This is a multi-center retrospective registry. Potential participants were identified through the ICD-10 codes from five hospitals serving the National Guard affiliates in SA. Patients aged ≥ 18 years treated in any National Guard hospital since 2010 for glomerulonephritis, CKD, or received hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or renal transplant were enrolled. Once enrolled in the registry, patients were followed to the last visit date. RedCap was used to create and host the online registry platform. Results: A total of 2,912 patients were included, and more than half were younger than 60 years old. Two-thirds of the patients were overweight (25%) or obese (37%). Glomerulonephritis was diagnosed in 10% of the patients, and dialysis-dependent and kidney transplant patients accounted for 31.4% and 24.4%, respectively. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were detected among 52% and 43% of the participants, respectively. Hemodialysis was the most prevalent dialysis method, with patients spending 3.6 ± 0.4 h per session to receive this treatment. One in every five participants had a kidney biopsy taken (21%). Several barriers and facilitators of the success of this registry were identified. Conclusions: The KIND registry provides much-needed information about CKD in Saudi Arabia and serves as a model for future projects investigating the natural history and progression of the spectrum of renal diseases. Logistic and financial challenges to the sustainability of registries are identified and discussed.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is classically described as a triad of nonimmune hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Atypical HUS (aHUS) is a rare variant of the disease, and it accounts for 5–10% of the cases. It has a poor prognosis, with a mortality rate exceeding 25% and a more than 50% chance of progressing into end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Genetic or acquired dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway is highly implicated in the pathogenesis of aHUS. Multiple triggers for aHUS have been described in the literature, including pregnancy, transplantation, vaccination, and viral infections. Herein, we report a case of a previously healthy 38-year-old male who developed microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and severe kidney impairment one week after receiving the first dose of AstraZeneca SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. A diagnosis of aHUS was made after excluding other causes of thrombotic microangiopathies. Treatment with plasma exchange, prednisone, and rituximab (375 mg/m²) once weekly for four doses resulted in improvement of his hematological parameters. However, he progressed to ESKD.