Petr Capek

Dr. Petr Capek

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 June 2016 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSChristina Schädel
Christina Schädel
MBMartin Bader
Martin Bader
ESEdward A. G. Schuur
Edward A. G. Schuur
CBChristina Biasi
Christina Biasi
RBRosvel Bracho
Rosvel Bracho
KWKimberly P. Wickland
Kimberly P. Wickland

1 August 2014 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BWBirgit Wild
Birgit Wild
JSJörg Schnecker
Jörg Schnecker
RARicardo J. Eloy Alves
Ricardo J. Eloy Alves
PBPavel Barsukov
Pavel Barsukov
JBJiří Bárta
Jiří Bárta
ARAndreas Richter
Andreas Richter
Rising temperatures in the Arctic can affect soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition directly and indirectly, by increasing plant primary production and thus the allocation of plant-derived organic compounds into the soil. Such compounds, for example root exudates or decaying fine roots, are easily available for microorganisms, and can alter the decomposition of older SOM (“priming effect”). We here report on a SOM priming experiment in the active layer of a permafrost soil from the central Siberian Arctic, comparing responses of organic topsoil, mineral subsoil, and cryoturbated subsoil material (i.e., poorly decomposed topsoil material subducted into the subsoil by freeze–thaw processes) to additions of 13C-labeled glucose, cellulose, a mixture of amino acids, and protein (added at levels corresponding to approximately 1% of soil organic carbon). SOM decomposition in the topsoil was barely affected by higher availability of organic compounds, whereas SOM decomposition in both subsoil horizons responded strongly. In the mineral subsoil, SOM decomposition increased by a factor of two to three after any substrate addition (glucose, cellulose, amino acids, protein), suggesting that the microbial decomposer community was limited in energy to break down more complex components of SOM. In the cryoturbated horizon, SOM decomposition increased by a factor of two after addition of amino acids or protein, but was not significantly affected by glucose or cellulose, indicating nitrogen rather than energy limitation. Since the stimulation of SOM decomposition in cryoturbated material was not connected to microbial growth or to a change in microbial community composition, the additional nitrogen was likely invested in the production of extracellular enzymes required for SOM decomposition. Our findings provide a first mechanistic understanding of priming in permafrost soils and suggest that an increase in the availability of organic carbon or nitrogen, e.g., by increased plant productivity, can change the decomposition of SOM stored in deeper layers of permafrost soils, with possible repercussions on the global climate.

30 July 2017 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMStefano Manzoni
Stefano Manzoni
Petr CapekPetr Capek
Petr Capek
MMMaria Mooshammer
Maria Mooshammer
BLBjörn D Lindahl
Björn D Lindahl
ARAndreas Richter
Andreas Richter
HŠHana Šantrůčková
Hana Šantrůčková
Most heterotrophic organisms feed on substrates that are poor in nutrients compared to their demand, leading to elemental imbalances that may constrain their growth and function. Flexible carbon (C)‐use efficiency (CUE, C used for growth over C taken up) can represent a strategy to reduce elemental imbalances. Here, we argue that metabolic regulation has evolved to maximise the organism growth rate along gradients of nutrient availability and translated this assumption into an optimality model that links CUE to substrate and organism stoichiometry. The optimal CUE is predicted to decrease with increasing substrate C‐to‐nutrient ratio, and increase with nutrient amendment. These predictions are generally confirmed by empirical evidence from a new database of c. 2200 CUE estimates, lending support to the hypothesis that CUE is optimised across levels of organisation (microorganisms and animals), in aquatic and terrestrial systems, and when considering nitrogen or phosphorus as limiting nutrients.

9 October 2018 in Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMStefano Manzoni
Stefano Manzoni
Petr CapekPetr Capek
Petr Capek
PPPhilipp Porada
Philipp Porada
MTMartin Thurner
Martin Thurner
MWMattias Winterdahl
Mattias Winterdahl
DWDanielle Way
Danielle Way
The cycling of carbon (C) between the Earth surface and the atmosphere is controlled by biological and abiotic processes that regulate C storage in biogeochemical compartments and release to the atmosphere. This partitioning is quantified using various forms of C-use efficiency (CUE) – the ratio of C remaining in a system to C entering that system. Biological CUE is the fraction of C taken up allocated to biosynthesis. In soils and sediments, C storage depends also on abiotic processes, so the term C-storage efficiency (CSE) can be used. Here we first review and reconcile CUE and CSE definitions proposed for autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms and communities, food webs, whole ecosystems and watersheds, and soils and sediments using a common mathematical framework. Second, we identify general CUE patterns; for example, the actual CUE increases with improving growth conditions, and apparent CUE decreases with increasing turnover. We then synthesize > 5000 CUE estimates showing that CUE decreases with increasing biological and ecological organization – from unicellular to multicellular organisms and from individuals to ecosystems. We conclude that CUE is an emergent property of coupled biological–abiotic systems, and it should be regarded as a flexible and scale-dependent index of the capacity of a given system to effectively retain C.

18 May 2018 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NGNorman Gentsch
Norman Gentsch
BWBirgit Wild
Birgit Wild
RMRobert Mikutta
Robert Mikutta
Petr CapekPetr Capek
Petr Capek
KDKatka Diáková
Katka Diáková
GGGeorg Guggenberger
Georg Guggenberger

10 September 2018 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Petr CapekPetr Capek
Petr Capek
SMStefano Manzoni
Stefano Manzoni
EKEva Kaštovská
Eva Kaštovská
BWBirgit Wild
Birgit Wild
KDKateřina Diáková
Kateřina Diáková
HŠHana Šantrůčková
Hana Šantrůčková