Purpose: To present our initial experience with the use of chimney grafts in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with challenging anatomy. Methods: Among 390 EVAR cases performed at our institution between November 2008 and February 2010, 15 patients (all men; mean age 81.8 years) underwent EVAR with synchronous placement of chimney grafts. The chimney technique involved placing covered stents parallel to the main aortic stent-graft to preserve or rescue flow to aortic branch vessels while extending the proximal fixation zone. All patients presented with pararenal aortic aneurysms with short necks (between 0 and 10 mm long) that required either suprarenal clamping to tailor a proximal anastomosis in open repair or suprarenal fixation to anchor an endoprosthesis. Chimney grafts were implanted into 10 left renal and 5 right renal arteries. Results: The immediate technical success was 100%. One early type II endoleak due to retrograde flow from the inferior mesenteric artery was detected and is under surveillance. Mean follow-up was 6.8 months (range 1–13). One chimney graft occluded 45 days postoperatively; the patient underwent open thrombectomy of the left renal artery and iliorenal bypass. The creatinine value at discharge was 1.6 mg/dL, and resting renal scintigraphy showed 36% perfusion for the left kidney and 64% for the right kidney. During follow-up, no patient required hemodialysis; no aneurysm-related deaths were noted. Conclusion: This limited experience demonstrates that the use of abdominal chimney grafts is feasible and safe. Long-term results in larger patient cohorts are needed evaluate the utility of this alternative endovascular technique.

Purpose To investigate the secondary procedures in patients with previous endovascular aortic repair by fenestrated or branched stent-grafts for aneurysms involving the renal and visceral vessels. Methods Between January 2001 and May 2010, 107 consecutive high-risk patients (97 men; mean age 73 years, range 50–86) with aortic aneurysms involving the renal and visceral arteries were treated with endovascular techniques. A custom-made Zenith graft was used in all patients. All secondary graft-related procedures performed in the perioperative period and during follow-up were analyzed. Estimates of survival, freedom from migration/type I endoleak, and freedom from any device-related secondary procedures were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results The 30-day mortality rate was 1.9%. During follow-up (mean 25 months, range 1–94), 34 secondary procedures were performed in 28 (26.2%) patients for 6 (17.6%) limb graft stenoses/thromboses (5.6% of 107 cases), 8 (23.5%) in-stent visceral vessel stenoses/ occlusions (7.5% of 107 cases), 8 (23.5%) migrations/type I endoleaks with/without visceral stent fractures (7.5% of 107 cases), and 12 (35.3%) type III endoleaks (9.3% of 107 cases). The mean interval between the primary and secondary procedures was 12.9 months (range 1?68). In 26 (76.5%) of 34 cases, a secondary endovascular procedure was performed; in the remaining 8 (23.5%) cases, the complication was treated surgically. The secondary procedure was unsuccessful in 9 cases of visceral vessel compromise (failure to cannulation, stent fracture/migration, in-stent stenosis/occlusion). Estimated 3-year survival was 77%, while the 3-year rate for freedom from any device-related secondary procedure was 75.5%. Conclusion The incidence of early and late complications requiring a secondary procedure after treatment with fenestrated or branched devices was not negligible. Endoleak type III represented the most common cause for reintervention during follow-up. Secondary procedures performed for visceral vessel compromise had high rates of treatment failure. Accurate preoperative planning, the advent of new materials/techniques, and strict follow-up could be the key factors to improving the results of fenestrated or branched stent-graft interventions and to reduce the rate of secondary procedures.

The prevalence of endograft infections (EI) after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is below 1%. With the growing number of patients with aortic endografts and the aging population, the number of patients with EI might also increase. The diagnosis is based on an association of clinical symptoms, imaging, and microbial cultures. Angio-computed tomography is currently the gold-standard technique for diagnosis. Low-grade infection sometimes requires nuclear medicine imaging to make a correct diagnosis. There is no good evidence to guide management so far. In the case of active gastrointestinal bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, or extensive perigraft purulence involving adjacent organs, an invasive treatment should always be attempted. In the other cases (the majority), when there is not an immediate danger to the patient's life, a conservative management is started with a proper antimicrobial therapy. Any infectious cavity can be percutaneously drained. Management depends on the patient's condition and a tailored approach should always be offered. In the case of a patient who is young, has a good life expectancy, or in whom there is absence of significant comorbidities, a surgical attempt can be proposed. Surgical techniques favor, in terms of mortality, patency, and reinfection rate, the in situ reconstruction. Choice of technique relies on the center and the operator's experience. Long-term antibiotic therapy is always required in all cases, with close monitoring of the C-reactive protein.