Endodontic disease with formation of periapical lesions (PALs) is one of the most common causes of chronic odontogenic sinusitis (ODS). It requires close collaboration between otolaryngologists and dentists, but the best sequence of management is still unknown. The aim of the present study is to clarify how radiological characteristics of teeth with PALs and previous root-canal treatment (RCT) influence the clinical evolution of the disease and to define the predictive value of its radiological and endoscopic features in determining the need for further surgical intervention. A total of 68 symptomatic patients with ODS with PALs were included in the study. The evaluation was performed by an otolaryngologist and a dentist based on a medical interview, nasal endoscopy, cold pulp testing and tomography images. Patients were prospectively followed for at least 12 months, during which nasal steroids, saline irrigations and RCT were administered. The criteria of disease improvement were: decrease of symptoms, healed sinonasal mucosa in endoscopy and radiological resolution of periapical radiolucency and sinus inflammation. Results showed that 9 (13%) patients improved after conservative treatment and 59 (87%) required further surgical intervention. Patients who improved after medical treatment and RCT were younger (p = 0.043) and had a greater distance from the top of the periapical lesion to the maxillary sinus’ floor (p = 0.003). When expansion of PALs and bone destruction toward the maxillary sinus was observed on radiological imaging (p = 0.041), and when more than one tooth root was affected (p = 0.004), patients were more likely to require surgical intervention. In conclusion, the more roots that are affected and the closer the top of the PAL is to the maxillary sinus’ floor, the greater the possibility of medical treatment and RCT failure. When the bone destruction extends into the maxillary sinus, patients eventually require both tooth extraction and FESS in order to resolve ODS completely.

Introduction: Usually the symptoms presented in odontogenic sinusitis do not differ from chronic sinusitis of other origin. However, odontogenic sinusitis is considered as an independent disease which requires specific diagnostic approach and treatment. Aim: The aim of the study is to define the main symptoms of odontogenic rhinosinusitis with periapical lesions and its impact on the quality of life. Material and methods: The SNOT-22 and OHIP-14 questionnaires were distributed among 26 symptomatic patients suffering from odontogenic sinusitis with periapical lesions in the teeth that remain in close contact with the maxillary sinus floor. Data was collected by means of an interview and standard examination performed by an otolaryngologist and a maxillofacial surgeon. The symptoms were also objectified using nasal endoscopy and radiological studies. The acquired data was statistically analyzed. Results: The total OHIP-14 score was 14.7 +/- 11.3, whereas the total SNOT-22 score was 44.6 +/- 18.8. Women scored significantly higher in the total SNOT-22 score as well as domains concerning nasal symptoms, quality of sleep, and emotional symptoms. The answers given in similar items were comparable between both questionnaires. Conclusions: Properly diagnosed odontogenic sinusitis (OS) with periapical lesions (PAL) will improve the quality of healthcare and spare the patients inadequate procedures. Standard examination should include a unified and validated questionnaire concerning both sinonasal and oral symptoms. Painful aching in the mouth and discomfort during eating might help to identify the OS with PAL during a medical interview and help both ENT (ear-nose-throat) specialists and dentists to establish proper patient-oriented diagnosis and treatment.

Objectives: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is common but frequently overlooked condition that differs from rhinogenic sinusitis (CRS) and should be suspected in each case of unilateral sinusitis. Clinical symptoms such as foul smell, congestion, rhinorrhea, and unilateral maxillary sinus opacification with overt dental pathology on radiological scans are more suggestive of ODS than CRS, but the distinctive microbiological flora are another clinical factor in diagnosis. The aim of this study was to compare the microbiological load of ODS and CRS and their clinical presentation for better disease recognition and its predisposing factors. Methods: Adult patients scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery were included in the study. Clinical data and radiological images were analyzed. The otolaryngologist assessed nasal endoscopy for mucopurulence or edema in middle meatus or sinuses, whereas dental specialist confirmed or ruled out the dental cause. Microbiological samples were collected after endoscopic maxillary antrostomy. After irrigation with 0,9% saline, the aspirated rinse was collected into sterile sets and sent for culturing. Results: The study group consisted of 84 patients, 55 with CRS and 29 with ODS. Streptococcus spp prevailed in the CRS group, whereas Staphylococcus spp prevailed in the ODS group. Statistically significant differences between the groups were found in type of discharge, degree of edema, and presence of polyps. However, no statistical correlations were noted for presence of bacteria in the culture and endoscopic or radiological findings. Conclusions: ODS and CRS share some common features: ODS more often presents with purulent discharge, localized maxillary involvement, and the presence of oral pathogens, and Staphylococcus spp in microbial profile.

Maxillary sinus abnormalities, including retention cysts and mucosal thickening, are often incidental findings and may be present in up to 35.6%, depending on imaging modality and population characteristics. To date, few studies have explored the appearance of maxillary sinus retention cysts using MRI. Aim: This study provides the first large-scale MRI-based assessment of these lesions, with the aim of evaluating the prevalence and characteristics of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected incidentally on head MRI scans, particularly focusing on retention cysts and mucosal changes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 3092 head MRI scans obtained between 2023 and 2024 was conducted to assess the prevalence and characteristics of maxillary sinus abnormalities. The mean patient age was 54.5 ± 18.6 years (median 56; range 18–99 years), with 1,825 women (59%). Statistical power exceeded 83% to detect differences of at least 10% in the prevalence of cysts between age groups (α = 0.05). A simplified MRI-based sinus assessment scale was used to categorize findings. Results: Out of 3092 scans, 1995 (64.5%) showed normal sinuses, 817 (26.4%) had mucosal thickening < 5 mm, 116 (3.8%) presented with retention cysts without other pathology, 100 (3.2%) exhibited moderate changes, and 64 (2.1%) had severe changes. Cysts were significantly more frequent in men (7.5%) than in women (4.4%) (p < 0.001). Additionally, maxillary sinus involvement differed significantly between sexes, with a higher prevalence in men. Conclusions: Incidental maxillary sinus findings are common and often benign. A comprehensive diagnostic approach is essential, especially for unilateral lesions near tooth roots. Conservative management remains appropriate for asymptomatic patients, but ongoing monitoring and patient education are key to preventing complications.

Objective: Normative values of Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17) allow the monitoring of surgery outcomes. The objective of our study was to determine the reference norms of these disease-specific questionnaires in the age group that most often seeks rhinoplasty. Methods: The normative values of the ROE and FROI-17 questionnaires were calculated for 570 (459 women and 111 men) young adults at the mean age of 19.3 ± 1.3 years, range 18–25 years. Each participant underwent an ENT examination. All those who obtained a positive result were asked to complete two questionnaires: ROE and FROI-17. Results: The mean total ROE score was 13.4 ± 2.3, with a median of 13 and a range from 7 to 24. The mean overall FROI-17 score was 9.1 ± 13.3, with a median of 4 and a range from 4 to 72. For nasal symptoms, the mean was 4.0 ± 6.0, with a median of 1 and a range from 0 to 29. We observed a statistically significant difference between men and women only for the normative values of nasal symptoms (mean 4.0 ± 5.9 and median 2 (0–27) vs. mean 3.7 ± 6.5 and median 0 (0–29)). Additionally, there was a statistically significant correlation between the normative values of the ROE and FROI-17 scores (ρs = −0.413 for all participants, ρs = −0.314 for women, and ρs = −0.437 for men). Conclusions: The established normative values for the ROE and FROI-17 questionnaires among young, healthy individuals without nasal abnormalities can assist in the initial assessment of individuals seeking rhinoplasty. Deviations from these normative values in the ROE and FROI-17 questionnaires results may serve as indicators of potential concerns, such as body dysmorphic disorder (BDD).