Adriano Mancini

Dr. Adriano Mancini

Università Politecnica delle Marche, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione - DII, via brecce bianche, 12, 60131 Ancona, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2018
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
MPMarina Paolanti
Marina Paolanti
LRLuca Romeo
Luca Romeo
AFAndrea Felicetti
Andrea Felicetti
AMAdriano Mancini
Adriano Mancini
EFEmanuele Frontoni
Emanuele Frontoni
Jelena LoncarskiJelena Loncarski
Jelena Loncarski
Condition monitoring together with predictive maintenance of electric motors and other equipment used by the industry avoids severe economic losses resulting from unexpected motor failures and greatly improves the system reliability. This paper describes a Machine Learning architecture for Predictive Maintenance, based on Random Forest approach. The system was tested on a real industry example, by developing the data collection and data system analysis, applying the Machine Learning approach and comparing it to the simulation tool analysis. Data has been collected by various sensors, machine PLCs and communication protocols and made available to Data Analysis Tool on the Azure Cloud architecture. Preliminary results show a proper behavior of the approach on predicting different machine states with high accuracy.

21 October 2009 in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACA. Cesetti
A. Cesetti
Emanuele FrontoniEmanuele Frontoni
Emanuele Frontoni
AMAdriano Mancini
Adriano Mancini
PZPrimo Zingaretti
Primo Zingaretti
SLSauro Longhi
Sauro Longhi

10 August 2012 in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAlessandro Benini
Alessandro Benini
AMAdriano Mancini
Adriano Mancini
SLSauro Longhi
Sauro Longhi

1 January 2010 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KKKourosh Khoshelham
Kourosh Khoshelham
CNCarla Nardinocchi
Carla Nardinocchi
Emanuele FrontoniEmanuele Frontoni
Emanuele Frontoni
AMAdriano Mancini
Adriano Mancini
PZPrimo Zingaretti
Primo Zingaretti
Automated approaches to building detection in multi-source aerial data are important in many applications, including map updating, city modeling, urban growth analysis and monitoring of informal settlements. This paper presents a comparative analysis of different methods for automated building detection in aerial images and laser data at different spatial resolutions. Five methods are tested in two study areas using features extracted at both pixel level and object level, but with the strong prerequisite of using the same training set for all methods. The evaluation of the methods is based on error measures obtained by superimposing the results on a manually generated reference map of each area. The results in both study areas show a better performance of the Dempster-Shafer and the AdaBoost methods, although these two methods also yield a number of unclassified pixels. The method of thresholding a normalized DSM performs well in terms of the detection rate and reliability in the less vegetated Mannheim study area, but also yields a high rate of false positive errors. The Bayesian methods perform better in the Memmingen study area where buildings have more or less the same heights

1 October 2016 in Pattern Recognition Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMirco Sturari
Mirco Sturari
DLDaniele Liciotti
Daniele Liciotti
Roberto PierdiccaRoberto Pierdicca
Roberto Pierdicca
Emanuele FrontoniEmanuele Frontoni
Emanuele Frontoni
AMAdriano Mancini
Adriano Mancini
PZPrimo Zingaretti
Primo Zingaretti

13 April 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAlessandro Galdelli
Alessandro Galdelli
AMAdriano Mancini
Adriano Mancini
CFCarmen Ferrà
Carmen Ferrà
Anna Nora TassettiAnna Nora Tassetti
Anna Nora Tassetti
Maritime traffic and fishing activities have accelerated considerably over the last decade, with a consequent impact on the environment and marine resources. Meanwhile, a growing number of ship-reporting technologies and remote-sensing systems are generating an overwhelming amount of spatio-temporal and geographically distributed data related to large-scale vessels and their movements. Individual technologies have distinct limitations but, when combined, can provide a better view of what is happening at sea, lead to effectively monitor fishing activities, and help tackle the investigations of suspicious behaviors in close proximity of managed areas. The paper integrates non-cooperative Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Sentinel-1 images and cooperative Automatic Identification System (AIS) data, by proposing two types of associations: (i) point-to-point and (ii) point-to-line. They allow the fusion of ship positions and highlight “suspicious” AIS data gaps in close proximity of managed areas that can be further investigated only once the vessel—and the gear it adopts—is known. This is addressed by a machine-learning approach based on the Fast Fourier Transform that classifies single sea trips. The approach is tested on a case study in the central Adriatic Sea, automatically reporting AIS-SAR associations and seeking ships that are not broadcasting their positions (intentionally or not). Results allow the discrimination of collaborative and non-collaborative ships, playing a key role in detecting potential suspect behaviors especially in close proximity of managed areas.