The World Health Organization classified Covid-19 as a pandemic during the first months of 2020 as lockdown measures were implemented globally to mitigate the increasing incidence of Covid-19-related morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of national lockdown measures on proximal femur fracture epidemiology. Our hypothesis was that due to the prolonged period of stay-at-home orders, we would observe a decrease in the incidence of proximal femur fractures during the years 2020–21. A retrospective case–control study of 2784 hip fractures admitted to the emergency department at one hospital between January 1, 2010, and March 31, 2021, was conducted. Cases were stratified weekly, and an analysis was conducted comparing cases occurring during government-imposed lockdown periods of 2020–21 to corresponding periods during 2010–2019. Furthermore, the trend of cases throughout the year of 2020 was observed. Of all proximal femur fracture cases included, 2522 occurred between 2010–2019 and 261 during the Covid-19 period. There was no significant difference in age (81.95 vs. 82.09; P = 0.78) or gender (P = 0.12). There was a total decrease of 21.64% in proximal femur fracture per week during the entirety of the Covid-19 pandemic period compared to the previous years (3.64 ± 1.99 vs. 4.76 ± 0.83; P = 0.001). During all three lockdown periods, there was a significant decrease in proximal femur fracture cases per week (3.55 ± 2.60 vs. 4.87 ± 0.95; P = 0.04), and the most pronounced decrease occurred during the third lockdown period (2.89 ± 1.96 vs. 5.23 ± 1.18; P = 0.01). We observed a total decrease in the number of proximal femur fractures occurring during the Covid-19 era compared to previous years and specifically a decrease of cases occurring during the government-imposed lockdown periods. The decrease in cases was more pronounced during the second and third lockdown periods.
Distal radius fractures are among the most prevalent long-bone fractures in the body. Fracture healing assessment is based on clinical evaluation and radiological examinations. A lack of consensus exists regarding the radiographic criteria for fracture union. Our work examined the commonly used criteria for the assessment of fracture healing. Thirty-two patients, conservatively treated for distal radius fracture, participated in a prospective study. Enrolled patients followed protocol for 26 weeks. Four orthopedic surgeons with similar ranks were asked to evaluate three parameters of radiographic measurements for each set of radiographs, including callus formation, the presence of a fracture line, and bridging of fracture sites or sites of fracture edges in 70 radiographs. Ten patients were eligible for the study. The degree of agreement among surgeons was “good” (Cronbach’s alpha): callus formation—0.8, bridging of fracture sites—0.775, blurring of fracture line gap—0.795. A timeline based on the specific week and grading system was made. Radiographic detection of callus formation was seen after the second film, between 6 and 9 weeks, and an agreement among surgeons was achieved for more than half of the patients for the blurring of the fracture gap. The radiographic healing progression of the distal radius can be detected after 6 and 9 weeks in all three parameters with good agreement between different surgeons. A timeline graph such as the one that was made in this model can be used for the follow-up of patients’ fracture healing or early detection of non-union.
Objectives: Operative fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures has become increasingly the more acceptable choice of care in recent years, based on evidence supporting its effectiveness. However, this practice presents challenges due to the complex S-shaped morphology of the clavicle and its subcutaneous location. Despite the introduction of anatomically pre-contoured plates, achieving optimal implant-to-bone fit remains difficult, prompting the development of newer plate generations. The aim of this study was to compare the hardware removal rates of second-generation 2.7 mm thinner plates (SGPs) with those of first-generation 3.5 mm plates (FGPs). Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted at a level one trauma center. A total of 187 patients received FGPs, and 67 received SGPs, both positioned on the superior bone surface. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained surgeons, and patients were followed for at least one year. Data were extracted from medical records and the PACS system. Results: The patients’ demographics (age: 32.86 vs. 33.14 years; gender: 16.85% vs. 14.92% female) and fracture type (AO/OTA) were similar between the two groups. The rate of implant removal (20.1% vs. 20.9%) did not differ significantly between groups. Complications included nonunion (1.6% vs. 1.7%, statistically not significant) and infection (three cases in the FGP group, none in the SGP group). Conclusions: Despite the high success rate of clavicle fixation procedures, the superior clavicular plate removal rate remains significant, regardless of the implant design.
Background/Objectives: Proximal femur fractures are common in the older population and are related to bone quality. Our work evaluates bone parameters from pelvic anteroposterior (AP) radiographs in patients with trochanteric and sub-capital fractures to determine if there are predictive morphology parameters for each fracture type. Methods: Data from 237 medical records were extracted from patients who arrived at our hospital with trochanteric and sub-capital femoral fractures. Descriptive data and radiological evaluation of the calcar-to-canal ratio (CCR), cortical thickness index (CTI), and Dorr classification were measured by two observers and statistically evaluated. Results: A total of 202 patients were found to be eligible for the study. The mean patient age was 81.41 ± 7.27 years old. The mean age of the trochanteric group was significantly higher than that of the sub-capital group (p = 0.005). There were no statistically significant differences in gender and comorbidities. The CCR showed significance, but the CTI and Dorr classification did not show a significant difference (p = 0.001, p = 0.78, and p = 0.98). A high degree of reliability was shown for all measurements. The ICC for CTI and CCR was p = 0.791 and p = 0.770 (p < 0.001), and Cronbach’s alpha was 0.815 and 0.796, respectively. Logistic regression was found to be significant in predicting 60.4% of correct forecasts with an odds ratio of 0.011 and 95% confidence interval (p = 0.001). For CTI, the correct forecasting rate was 48%, with an odds ratio of 0.615 (p = 0.78). Conclusions: We found that, out of the measured parameters, the CCR stood out as important, showing that higher CCR levels are linked to an increased likelihood of trochanteric fractures.