There have been efforts to use building demolition waste as an alternative aggregate in concrete to decrease the use of natural resources for construction. The World Green Building Council estimates that the construction industry is responsible for more than 50% of all material extracted globally and that construction and demolition waste makes up 35% of global landfills. As a result, incorporating recycled aggregate (RA) in concrete production is a prudent course of action to reduce the environmental impact. This study reviews prior research on using recycled aggregate instead of conventional ingredients in concrete. The composition and morphology of different types of RA, the behavior of RA in fresh and hardened states, keyword co-occurrence and evolution analysis, and the various additives used to enhance the inferior properties of RA are discussed. The RA showed different physical properties when compared with natural aggregate. However, the addition of pozzolanic materials and various pretreatment techniques is desirable for improving the inferior properties of RA. While building waste has been utilized as a substitute for fine and coarse aggregate, prior research has demonstrated that a modified mixing approach, an adequate mixing proportion, and the optimum replacement of cementitious materials are necessary. Based on the review, the recommendation is to use RA at a replacement level of up to 30% and the addition of precoated and pozzolanic materials as a treatment to provide concrete with adequate workability, strength, and durability for structural applications.

The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive study about the performance of concrete using mixed coarse recycled aggregate (MCRA) as an alternative for natural aggregate (NA) at replacement levels of 0, 30, 60, and 100%, which can greatly reduce the environmental pollution by incorporating the construction and demolition wastes in the reproduction of concrete. The focus of this study was to use the raw MCRA that was directly obtained from a recycling plant and not further processed. Initially, MCRA was studied to ascertain if its property meets the recommended Indian standards for natural aggregates. Using the slump test, the workability of freshly prepared concrete with a characteristic strength of 30 MPa was assessed. Additionally, the mechanical performance of concrete was assessed on the specimens prepared in the different forms: cubes, cylinders, and beams. Moreover, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with EDAX, XRD, and FTIR were used to study the microstructural behavior of selected optimum and control mixes at 7 and 28 days of curing. The studies revealed that a higher MCRA content improved the workability of concrete and 30% replacement of MCRA improved the compressive strength by 11.01, 6.98, 6.19, and 14.24% at 7, 28, 56, and 90 days respectively. At the same time, the 30% replacement of the MCRA mix showed an improved split tensile and flexural strength by 2.92 and 6.26%, respectively. The microstructural analysis showed that the optimum mixture had a more condensed microstructure. Therefore, 30% replacement of MCRA can be incorporated in the characteristic strength of concrete of 30 MPa. In particular, MCRA incorporation had a positive influence similar to conventional concrete on the physical, mechanical, and microstructural properties, which can increase the utilization of all kinds of directly obtained construction and demolition wastes to increase the circular economy in the construction sector.

The mechanical properties of concrete were optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) and fuzzy logic. The aggregate portion of the concrete was replaced with recycled aggregate to address the environmental problems caused by building demolition wastes. The essential key factors that influenced the suitability of recycled aggregate in concrete applications are the compressive strength (CS), flexural strength (FS), and the split tensile strength (STS). The experiments were designed with nine combinations of two input factors (percentage of coarse and fine recycled aggregates) at different levels 30, 60, and 100%. Furthermore, optimization techniques were used to determine the strong correlations between the variables and the mechanical parameters. Such optimization techniques helped to identify the optimistic maximum strength for replacing 44% coarse and 65% fine recycled aggregate. Using RSM, the maximum strength results were found to be: CS at 7, 28, 56, and 90 days were 23.61, 35.04, 40.02, and 43.63 N/mm2, respectively, FS 3.6 N/mm2 and STS 2.0 N/mm2. The maximum strength parameters were found using fuzzy logic: CS at 7, 28, 56, and 90 days were 23.5, 35.8, 41, and 46.7 N/mm2, respectively, FS 4.13 N/mm2 and STS 1.97 N/mm2. Such optimization can be carried out to lower the material wastage, energy consumption, and expenses for the production.

The purpose of this research is to produce sustainable concrete through the use of recycled aggregates as both fine and coarse aggregates. The use of industrially processed recycled aggregates, as opposed to laboratory-crushed materials, enables this study to generate durability and non-destructive performance data with enhanced relevance for practical construction applications. The ultrasonic pulse velocity values ranged from 4.1 to 4.89 km s ⁻¹ , indicating good to excellent concrete quality, while rebound numbers (33.8–40.4) confirmed adequate surface hardness at 28 days. Although, recycled aggregate concrete exhibited higher water penetration (11.94–48 mm), water absorption (3.5%–8.67%), and chloride permeability (1145–2992 coulombs) than natural aggregate concrete, these properties improved significantly with curing age, resulting in acceptable durability performance that remained below that of natural aggregate concrete. The microstructural and image processing results revealed higher replacement of recycled aggregates producing greater porosity and lower strength, which could negatively impact the durability characteristics of the concrete mixes. Thus, these results emphasize the critical requirements to optimize recycled aggregate content to achieve both environmental and performance efficiency.

This chapter explores how intelligent motion control systems can be utilised to drive sustainable civil engineering through greater efficiency, precision, and safety. Based on a mixed-method study of 650 respondents and an expert interviews, the results show that if motion controlled equipment is implemented on a large scale, it could significantly increase energy efficiency, decrease material waste and emissions, and improve employees' safety. Evidence to substantiate strong relationships between adoption and sustainability outcomes came from ANOVA, regression, and SEM. It also highlights the financial, cultural and technical challenges facing the sustainable development of infrastructures in the Industry 5.0 era and proposes practical solutions and governance strategies, as well as directions for future research