Marcelo Almeida

Dr. Marcelo Almeida

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 November 2023 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gaurav RawalGaurav Rawal
Gaurav Rawal
MAMarcelo Almeida
Marcelo Almeida
PGPhil Gauger
Phil Gauger
JZJeff J Zimmermann
Jeff J Zimmermann
FYFangshu Ye
Fangshu Ye
JZJianqiang Zhang
Jianqiang Zhang
The recently emerged PRRSV 1-4-4 L1C variant (L1C.5) was in vivo and in vitro characterized in this study in comparison with three other contemporary 1-4-4 isolates (L1C.1, L1A, and L1H) and one 1-7-4 L1A isolate. Seventy-two 3-week-old PRRSV-naive pigs were divided into six groups with twelve pigs/group. Forty-eight pigs (eight/group) were for inoculation, and 24 pigs (four/group) served as contact pigs. Pigs in pen A of each room were inoculated with the corresponding virus or negative media. At two days post inoculation (DPI), contact pigs were added to pen B adjacent to pen A in each room. Pigs were necropsied at 10 and 28 DPI. Compared to other virus-inoculated groups, the L1C.5-inoculated pigs exhibited more severe anorexia and lethargy, higher mortality, a higher fraction of pigs with fever (>40 °C), higher average temperature at several DPIs, and higher viremia levels at 2 DPI. A higher percentage of the contact pigs in the L1C.5 group became viremic at two days post contact, implying the higher transmissibility of this virus strain. It was also found that some PRRSV isolates caused brain infection in inoculation pigs and/or contact pigs. The complete genome sequences and growth characteristics in ZMAC cells of five PRRSV-2 isolates were further compared. Collectively, this study confirms that the PRRSV 1-4-4 L1C variant (L1C.5) is highly virulent with potential higher transmissibility, but the genetic determinants of virulence remain to be elucidated.
1

10 March 2021 in Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GTGiovani Trevisan
Giovani Trevisan
KSKent J. Schwartz
Kent J. Schwartz
EBEric Burrough
Eric Burrough
BABailey Arruda
Bailey Arruda
RDRachel J. Derscheid
Rachel J. Derscheid
DLDaniel C. L. Linhares
Daniel C. L. Linhares
Accurate and timely results of diagnostic investigations and laboratory testing guide clinical interventions for the continuous improvement of animal health and welfare. Infectious diseases can severely limit the health, welfare, and productivity of populations of animals. Livestock veterinarians submit thousands of samples daily to veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs) for disease diagnosis, pathogen monitoring, and surveillance. Individual diagnostic laboratory reports are immediately useful; however, aggregated historical laboratory data are increasingly valued by clinicians and decision-makers to identify changes in the health status of various animal populations over time and geographical space. The value of this historical information is enhanced by visualization of trends of agent detection, disease diagnosis, or both, which helps focus time and resources on the most significant pathogens and fosters more effective communication between livestock producers, veterinarians, and VDL professionals. Advances in data visualization tools allow quick, efficient, and often real-time scanning and analysis of databases to inform, guide, and modify animal health intervention algorithms. Value is derived at the farm, production system, or regional level. Visualization tools allow client-specific analyses, benchmarking, formulation of research questions, and monitoring the effects of disease management and precision farming practices. We present here the approach taken to visualize trends of disease occurrence using porcine disease diagnostic code data for the period 2010 to 2019. Our semi-automatic standardized creation of a visualization platform allowed the transformation of diagnostic report data into aggregated information to visualize and monitor disease diagnosis.

1 August 2021 in Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMarcelo Almeida
Marcelo Almeida
MZM. Zhang
M. Zhang
JZJeff J Zimmermann
Jeff J Zimmermann
DHDerald Holtkamp
Derald Holtkamp
DLD.C.L. Linhares
D.C.L. Linhares

10 December 2024 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGuilherme Cezar
Guilherme Cezar
EMEdison Magalhaes
Edison Magalhaes
KRKinath Rupasinghe
Kinath Rupasinghe
SCSrijita Chandra
Srijita Chandra
GSGustavo Silva
Gustavo Silva
GTGiovani Trevisan
Giovani Trevisan
Porcine circoviruses (PCVs), including porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) and porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3), have been associated with clinical syndromes in swine, resulting in significant economic losses. To better understand the epidemiology and clinical relevance of PCV2 and PCV3, this study analyzed a dataset comprising diagnostic data from six veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs) in the United States of America. The data comprised of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results, sample type, and age group for PCV2 and PCV3 submissions from 2002–2023. Findings indicated a decrease in the percentage of PCV2-positive submissions after introducing a commercial PCV2 vaccine in 2006 and a resurgence in positivity after 2018, particularly in breeding herds, associated with an increased number of submissions using processing fluid samples. After its first report in the U.S. in 2016, PCV3 detection had an upward trend in the percentage of positive cases, peaking in spring 2023. PCV3 detection was more frequent in adult/sow farms, while PCV2 was more frequently detected in the wean-to-market category. An additional analysis used results from tissue diagnostic data from 2019–2023 from one VDL to associate PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values with the probability of confirming a PCV2 or PCV3 disease diagnosis confirmation. An interpretative PCR Ct cutoff for PCV2 and PCV3 diagnoses was assessed based on the logistic regression model associating Ct values with the presence of tissue lesions. The analysis considered only cases tested for PCV2 and PCV3 by PCR with tissue evaluations by diagnosticians. An interpretative Ct cutoff of 22.4 for PCV2 was associated with a high probability of confirming a diagnosis of PCV2 clinical disease through histopathology. For PCV3, the interpretative cutoff with the highest performance was 26.7. These findings contribute to the ongoing efforts to monitor and understand the clinical relevance of PCV2 and PCV3 PCR results, identifying potential disease challenges.

1 July 2025 in Veterinary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRodrigo C. Paiva
Rodrigo C. Paiva
EBEric R. Burrough
Eric R. Burrough
NMNubia Macedo
Nubia Macedo
ASAna Paula S. P. Silva
Ana Paula S. P. Silva
MLMaud de Lagarde
Maud de Lagarde
MAMarcelo Almeida
Marcelo Almeida
Post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) due to Escherichia coli in pigs is a significant enteric disease in the U.S. Contemporary data about the main virulence factors, colony morphology, and distribution of virotypes of isolates associated with post-weaning colibacillosis (PWC) is essential information for swine veterinarians, producers, and stakeholders. This study reports the rate of PWC/PWD, frequency of detection of fimbrial types, pathotypes, toxins, virotypes, morphological characteristics, and temporal analysis of the most prevalent virotype of enterotoxigenic E. coli recovered from cases of PWD in pigs in the United States. There was a significant increase in PWC cases submitted to the diagnostic laboratory in 2013, 2014, and 2021, respectively. A greater frequency of detection of F18 fimbrial adhesin (69.87%) was observed compared to F4 (26.19%), F5 (0.25%), F41 (0.13%), AIDA (0.10%), and multiple adhesins (3.46%), respectively. Hybrid ETEC:STEC pathotype was greater than ETEC and STEC, and STb toxin was present in 93.33% of the detected isolates. The most frequently observed virotype was F18:LT:STa:STb:Stx2e (27.71%). Smooth:mucoid colony morphology was associated with a greater likelihood of PWC (0.758, 0.968, and 0.993) compared to smooth, intermediate, and rough, respectively. The frequency of the F18:LT:STa:STb:Stx2e virotype increased across all U.S. states from 2016 to 2023, greatest in the northwest and east of Iowa and northeast Indiana in 2022 and Iowa in 2023. The virulence factors and morphology of enterotoxigenic E. coli associated with PWC across different states in the U.S. from 2010 to 2023 were diverse; nevertheless, the virotype F18:LT:STa:STb:Stx2e predominated and increased in frequency during this time period.

9 August 2018 in Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMarcelo Almeida
Marcelo Almeida
JZJeff J Zimmermann
Jeff J Zimmermann
CWC. Wang
C. Wang
DLDaniel CL Linhares
Daniel CL Linhares
Various porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) regional elimination projects have been implemented in the U.S., but none have yet succeeded. In part, this reflects the need for efficient methods to monitor over time the progress of PRRSV status of participating herds. This study assessed the feasibility of monitoring PRRSV using oral fluids collected at the abattoir. A total of 36 pig lots were included in the study. On-farm oral fluid (n = 10) and serum (n = 10) collected within two days of shipment to the abattoir were used to establish the reference PRRSV status of the population. Oral fluids (n = 3 per lot) were successfully collected from 32 lots (89%) at the lairage. Three veterinary diagnostic laboratories (VDLs) tested the sera (VDL1 and VDL3: n = 316, VDL2: n = 315) and oral fluids (VDL1 and VDL3: n = 319, VDL2: n = 320) for PRRSV antibodies (ELISA) and RNA (rRT-PCR). Environmental samples (n = 64, 32 before and 32 after pigs were placed in lairage) were tested for PRRSV RNA at one VDL. All oral fluids (farm and abattoir) tested positive for PRRSV antibody at all VDLs. PRRSV positivity frequency on serum ranged from 92.4% to 94.6% among VDLs, with an overall agreement of 97.6%. RNA was detected on 1.3% to 1.9%, 8.1% to 17.7%, and 8.3% to 17.7% of sera, on-farm and abattoir oral fluids, respectively. Between-VDLs rRT-PCR agreement on sera and oral fluids (farm and abattoir) ranged from 97.8% to 99.0%, and 79.0% to 81.2%, respectively. Between-locations agreement of oral fluids varied from 31.3% to 50% depending on the VDL. This study reported the application of swine oral fluids collected at the abattoir for monitoring PRRSV, and describes the between-VDL agreement for PRRS testing of serum and oral fluid field samples.