This study aimed to quantitatively compare the difference in protein expression in the progression of pulp pathogenesis, as well as to describe the biological functions of proteins identified in pulp tissue. Samples were obtained from six patients treated at the Araçatuba School of Dentistry and were divided into three groups: normal pulp - from teeth extracted for orthodontic indication; inflamed pulp and necrotic pulp - from patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis and chronic apical periodontitis, respectively. After previous proteomic preparation, dental pulp samples were processed for label-free quantitative proteomic analysis in a nanoACQUITY UPLC-Xevo QTof MS system. The difference in expression between the groups was calculated using the Protein Lynx Global Service software using the Monte Carlo algorithm. A total of 465 human proteins were identified in all groups. The most expressed proteins in the inflamed pulp group in relation to the normal pulp group were hemoglobin, peroxiredoxins and immunoglobulins, whereas the less expressed were the tubulins. Expression levels of albumins, immunoglobulins and alpha-2-macroglobulin were higher in the necrotic pulp group than in the inflamed pulp group. As for the qualitative analysis, the most prevalent protein functions in the normal pulp group were metabolic and energetic pathways; in the inflamed pulp group: cellular communication and signal transduction; and regulation and repair of DNA/RNA, while in the necrotic pulp group proteins were associated with the immune response. Thus, proteomic analysis showed quantitative and qualitative differences in protein expression in different types of pulp conditions.

This clinical study compared the effectiveness of two rotary systems: HyFlex CM (Coltene-Whaledent, Altstetten, Switzerland) and ProTaper Next (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) on the removal of cultivable bacteria and endotoxins from primarily infected root canals. This study was designed as a randomized single-blinded, 2-arm, clinical trial. Twenty-four primarily infected root canals were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups: HyFlex CM (n = 12); and ProTaper Next (n = 12). Samples were collected before and after the biomechanical preparation and inoculated in specific flasks. Irrigation was performed using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. A kinetic turbidimetric lysate assay of limulus amoebocytes was used to quantify endotoxins. Microbiological culture technique was used to determine the count of bacterial colony forming units (CFU/mL). Data collected were statistically analyzed using SigmaPlot 12.0 for Windows. The Two-Way ANOVA statistical test was performed and the level of significance was 5%. In the samples before the biomechanical preparation, cultivable bacteria and endotoxins were evidenced in 100% of the cases. The culture analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the bacterial reduction between the two instrumentation systems. Endotoxins were present in 100% of the canals after instrumentation and there was no statistical difference between the two systems in endotoxin reduction. Thus, it was concluded that both instrumentation systems were effective in reducing root canal bacteria and endotoxins with primary endodontic infection and that there was no statistical difference between them. However, no system was able to eliminate 100% of the bacteria and their by-products.

(1) Background: This study evaluates the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on the peri-implant bone healing of implants with a machined surface (MS) and treated surface (TS). (2) Methods: Topographic characterization of the surfaces (scanning electron microscopy [SEM]- energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy [EDX]) was performed before and after implant removal. Twenty rabbits were randomly divided into four groups: MS and TS groups (without PBM therapy) and LMS and LTS groups (with PBM therapy). After implant placement, the stability coefficient (ISQ) was measured. In the periods of 21 and 42 days, the ISQ was measured again, followed by biomechanical analysis. (3) Results: The surfaces of the TS implants showed topographic differences compared with MS implants. The ISQ values of the LMS were statistically significant when compared with those of the MS at 42 days (p < 0.001). The removal torque values of the LMS were statistically significant when compared with those of the MS at 21 days (p = 0.023) and 42 days (p = 0.023). For SEM, in general, the LMS, TS and LTS presented high bone tissue coverage when compared to MS. (4) Conclusions: The PBM therapy modulated the osseointegration process and was evidenced mainly on the machined surface.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) protocols on debris removal and exposure of dentinal tubules in simulated complex root canal cavities. Twenty single-rooted human mandibular premolars with simulated root canal cavities were filled with the debris and randomly divided into ten groups based on the final irrigation protocol: 1—positive control; 2—negative control; 3—conventional irrigation (CI) with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); 4—CI with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) followed by NaOCl; 5—three cycles of PUI for 20 s (NaOCl-NaOCl-NaOCl); 6—three cycles of PUI for 20 s (NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl); 7—one 60 s PUI cycle (NaOCl); 8—one PUI 180 s cycle (NaOCl); 9—two cycles of PUI for 60 s (EDTA-NaOCl); and 10—two cycles of PUI for 60 s (NaOCl-EDTA). The groups were analyzed by SEM. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used at a 5% level. PUI showed a higher reduction of debris, similar to the positive control group (p > 0.05) and higher than the CI and negative control groups (p < 0.05). Regarding the exposure tubules, the CI groups were similar to the negative control group in all cavities (p > 0.05). The PUI groups were similar to the positive control group (p > 0.05). However, only groups 6, 7, and 10 were statistically different from the CI and negative control (p < 0.05). The protocols using PUI, comprising groups with three cycles of 20 s (NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl), two cycles of 60 s (EDTA-NaOCl), or one cycle of 60 s (NaOCl), were more effective at removing debris and increasing the exposure of dentinal tubules.