Deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy requires extensive patient-specific planning prior to implantation to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Collective analysis of patient's brain images is promising in order to provide more systematic planning assistance. In this paper the design of a normalization pipeline using a group specific multi-modality iterative template creation process is presented. The focus was to compare the performance of a selection of freely available registration tools and select the best combination. The workflow was applied on 19 DBS patients with T1 and WAIR modality images available. Non-linear registrations were computed with ANTS, FNIRT and DRAMMS, using several settings from the literature. Registration accuracy was measured using single-expert labels of thalamic and subthalamic structures and their agreement across the group. The best performance was provided by ANTS using the High Variance settings published elsewhere. Neither FNIRT nor DRAMMS reached the level of performance of ANTS. The resulting normalized definition of anatomical structures were used to propose an atlas of the diencephalon region defining 58 structures using data from 19 patients.

The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies primarily on the localization of the implanted electrode. Its final position can be chosen based on the results of intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) and stimulation tests. The optimal position often differs from the final one selected for chronic stimulation with the DBS electrode. The aim of the study was to investigate, using finite element method (FEM) modeling and simulations, whether lead design, electrical setup, and operating modes induce differences in electric field (EF) distribution and in consequence, the clinical outcome. Finite element models of a MER system and a chronic DBS lead were developed. Simulations of the EF were performed for homogenous and patient-specific brain models to evaluate the influence of grounding (guide tube vs. stimulator case), parallel MER leads, and non-active DBS contacts. Results showed that the EF is deformed depending on the distance between the guide tube and stimulating contact. Several parallel MER leads and the presence of the non-active DBS contacts influence the EF distribution. The DBS EF volume can cover the intraoperatively produced EF, but can also extend to other anatomical areas. In conclusion, EF deformations between stimulation tests and DBS should be taken into consideration as they can alter the clinical outcome.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for movement disorders such as essential tremor (ET). Positioning of the DBS lead in the patient’s brain is crucial for effective treatment. Extensive evaluations of improvement and adverse effects of stimulation at different positions for various current amplitudes are performed intraoperatively. However, to choose the optimal position of the lead, the information has to be “mentally” visualized and analyzed. This paper introduces a new technique called “stimulation maps,” which summarizes and visualizes the high amount of relevant data with the aim to assist in identifying the optimal DBS lead position. It combines three methods: outlines of the relevant anatomical structures, quantitative symptom evaluation, and patient-specific electric field simulations. Through this combination, each voxel in the stimulation region is assigned one value of symptom improvement, resulting in the division of stimulation region into areas with different improvement levels. This technique was applied retrospectively to five ET patients in the University Hospital in Clermont-Ferrand, France. Apart from identifying the optimal implant position, the resultant nine maps show that the highest improvement region is frequently in the posterior subthalamic area. The results demonstrate the utility of the stimulation maps in identifying the optimal implant position.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). The mechanism of action of DBS is still incompletely understood. Retrospective group analysis of intra-operative data recorded from ET patients implanted in the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim) is rare. Intra-operative stimulation tests generate rich data and their use in group analysis has not yet been explored. Objective. To implement, evaluate, and apply a group analysis workflow to generate probabilistic stimulation maps (PSMs) using intra-operative stimulation data from ET patients implanted in Vim. Approach. A group-specific anatomical template was constructed based on the magnetic resonance imaging scans of 6 ET patients and 13 PD patients. Intra-operative test data (total: n = 1821) from the 6 ET patients was analyzed: patient-specific electric field simulations together with tremor assessments obtained by a wrist-based acceleration sensor were transferred to this template. Occurrence and weighted mean maps were generated. Voxels associated with symptomatic response were identified through a linear mixed model approach to form a PSM. Improvements predicted by the PSM were compared to those clinically assessed. Finally, the PSM clusters were compared to those obtained in a multicenter study using data from chronic stimulation effects in ET. Main results. Regions responsible for improvement identified on the PSM were in the posterior sub-thalamic area (PSA) and at the border between the Vim and ventro-oral nucleus of the thalamus (VO). The comparison with literature revealed a center-to-center distance of less than 5 mm and an overlap score (Dice) of 0.4 between the significant clusters. Our workflow and intra-operative test data from 6 ET-Vim patients identified effective stimulation areas in PSA and around Vim and VO, affirming existing medical literature. Significance. This study supports the potential of probabilistic analysis of intra-operative stimulation test data to reveal DBS’s action mechanisms and to assist surgical planning.

This paper presents a tracking system using magnetometers, possibly integrable in a deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode. DBS is a treatment for movement disorders where the position of the implant is of prime importance. Positioning challenges during the surgery could be addressed thanks to a magnetic tracking. The system proposed in this paper, complementary to existing procedures, has been designed to bridge preoperative clinical imaging with DBS surgery, allowing the surgeon to increase his/her control on the implantation trajectory. Here the magnetic source required for tracking consists of three coils, and is experimentally mapped. This mapping has been performed with an in-house three-dimensional magnetic camera. The system demonstrates how magnetometers integrated directly at the tip of a DBS electrode, might improve treatment by monitoring the position during and after the surgery. The three-dimensional operation without line of sight has been demonstrated using a reference obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a simplified brain model. We observed experimentally a mean absolute error of 1.35 mm and an Euclidean error of 3.07 mm. Several areas of improvement to target errors below 1 mm are also discussed.

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for movement and neuropsychiatric disorders. Identifying brain regions (Probabilistic Sweet Spots, PSS) linked with the greatest symptom improvement is crucial for refining pre-operative targeting and post-operative programming. Probabilistic stimulation mapping is a powerful data-driven tool to delineate these regions. However, the chosen statistical methods can influence the identified PSS. A comprehensive evaluation of their impact is lacking in DBS research. The present study compares the PSS generated with four voxel-wise statistical approaches - t-test, Wilcoxon test, Linear Mixed Model, and Bayesian t-test - with the aim of assessing their influence on computed results on the same dataset. Intra-operative stimulation test data of 23 Essential Tremor (ET) patients was used to run patient-specific electric field simulations and to generate PSS in a group-specific anatomical template space. The PSS for the different statistical tests were first compared in terms of size and topography. Then, their correlation with clinical improvement was calculated in a leave-one-out cross-validation scheme and PSS consistency across datasets with different compositions was assessed. Our findings emphasize the impact of statistical test selection on both the anatomical location and volume of the extracted PSS, highlighting the importance of careful methodological choices in future DBS mapping studies. The Bayesian t-test and a voxel-wise application of nonparametric permutation testing, introduced for the first time in DBS research, showed promising results in identifying PSS representative of improvement and exhibited robustness to variations in the dataset.