Maxne Bonham

Dr. Maxne Bonham

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2010 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAlison J. McAfee
Alison J. McAfee
Emeir McSorleyEmeir McSorley
Emeir McSorley
GCGeraldine J Cuskelly
Geraldine J Cuskelly
BMBruce W. Moss
Bruce W. Moss
JWJulie M.W. Wallace
Julie M.W. Wallace
AFAnna M. Fearon
Anna M. Fearon

1 December 2008 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKevin Cashman
Kevin Cashman
THTom R Hill
Tom R Hill
ALAlice Lucey
Alice Lucey
NTNicola Taylor
Nicola Taylor
KSKelly M Seamans
Kelly M Seamans
MKMairead Kiely
Mairead Kiely
Background: Knowledge gaps have contributed to considerable variation among international dietary recommendations for vitamin D.

1 September 2008 in NeuroToxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSean Strain
Sean Strain
PDPhilip W. Davidson
Philip W. Davidson
MBMaxne Bonham
Maxne Bonham
Emeir McSorleyEmeir McSorley
Emeir McSorley
ASAbbie Stokes-Riner
Abbie Stokes-Riner
TCThomas W. Clarkson
Thomas W. Clarkson

1 September 2008 in NeuroToxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPhilip W. Davidson
Philip W. Davidson
JSJ.J. Strain
J.J. Strain
GMGary J. Myers
Gary J. Myers
STSally W. Thurston
Sally W. Thurston
MBMaxne Bonham
Maxne Bonham
TCThomas W. Clarkson
Thomas W. Clarkson

1 May 2009 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KCKevin D Cashman
Kevin D Cashman
JWJulie Mw Wallace
Julie Mw Wallace
GHGeraldine Horigan
Geraldine Horigan
THTom R Hill
Tom R Hill
MBMaria S Barnes
Maria S Barnes
MKMairead Kiely
Mairead Kiely
Background: Older adults may be more prone to developing vitamin D deficiency than younger adults. Dietary requirements for vitamin D in older adults are based on limited evidence.

15 June 2016 in Chronobiology International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMaxne Bonham
Maxne Bonham
EBEmily K. Bonnell
Emily K. Bonnell
CHCatherine E. Huggins
Catherine E. Huggins
Shift work is an established risk factor for a number of chronic conditions associated with excess energy intake including obesity, cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. This systematic review investigated whether the 24 h energy intake of shift workers differs to that of fixed day workers. Included articles compared energy intake of shift workers (shift included midnight) with fixed day workers. There were 10 367 day workers and 4726 shift workers from 12 studies included in the qualitative analysis and meta-analyses. The standardised mean difference (95% CI) in energy intake between shift and day workers was −0.04 (−0.11, 0.03); I2 = 54%. Qualitative results on macronutrient intakes were conflicting. Reported energy intakes were not different between day workers and shift workers, suggesting that other factors such as circadian misalignment, meal timing, food choice and diurnal variation of energy metabolism at night may be responsible for the increased rates of obesity observed in shift workers. Guidance on health and well-being is required for this at-risk population group.