The burden of osteoarthritis (OA) is around 300 million people affected worldwide, with the hip representing a commonly affected joint. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been used with notable success as a definitive treatment to improve pain and function in hip OA patients. The recent advent of new technologies, such as 3D printing, has pushed the application of these new concepts toward applications for the well-known THA. Currently, the evidence on the use of 3D printing to aid complex primary THA cases is still scarce. Methods: An extensive literature review was conducted to retrieve all articles centered on the use of 3D printing in the setting of primary THA. Results: A total of seven studies were included in the present systematic review. Four studies investigated the use of 3D-printed surgical guides to be used during surgery. The remaining three studies investigated the benefit of the use of 3D-printed templates of the pelvis to simulate the surgery. Conclusions: The use of 3D printing could be a promising aid to solve difficult primary total hip arthroplasty cases. However, the general enthusiasm in the field is not supported by high-quality studies, hence preventing us from currently recommending its application in everyday practice.

Background: The pre-operative three-dimensional (3D) assessment of acetabular bone defects may not be evaluated properly with conventional radiographic and computed tomography images. This paper reports mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of complex revision total hip arthroplasty (r-THA) based on a 3D life-sized printed model. Methods: Patients who underwent r-THA for septic or aseptic acetabular loosening with acetabular defects Paprosky types IIc, IIIa, and IIIb between 2019 and 2021 were included. The outcomes of the study were to determine clinical and radiographic assessment outcomes at the time of the last follow-up. Results: 25 patients with mean age of 62.9 ± 10.8 (18–83) years old were included. The mean Harris hip score improved from 34.8 ± 8.1 pre-operative to 81.6 ± 10.4 points (p < 0.001). The mean visual analog scale decreased from 6.7 ± 1.4 points pre-operative to 2.4 ± 1.0 points (p < 0.001). The mean limb length discrepancy improved from −2.0 ± 1.2 cm pre-operative to −0.6 ± 0.6 cm (p < 0.001). The mean vertical position of the center of rotation (COR) changed from 3.5 ± 1.7 cm pre-operative to 2.0 ± 0.7 cm (p < 0.05). The mean horizontal COR changed from 3.9 ± 1.5 cm pre-operative to 3.2 ± 0.5 cm (p < 0.05). The mean acetabular component abduction angle changed from 59.7° ± 29.6° pre-operative to 46° ± 3.9 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: A three-dimensional-printed model provides an effective connection between the pre-operative bone defects’ evaluation and the intraoperative findings, enabling surgeons to select optimal surgical strategies.

An emerging issue for orthopedic surgeons is how to manage patients with active or previous COVID-19 disease, avoiding any major risks for the surgeons and the O.R. personnel. This monocentric prospective observational study aims to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RT-PCR RNA in cancellous bone samples in patients with active or previous COVID-19 disease. We collected data about 30 consecutive patients from our institution from January 2021 to March 2021 with active or previous COVID-19 disease. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the samples was determined using two different PCR-based assays. Eighteen of the thirty patients included in the study had a positive nasopharyngeal swab at the time of surgery. Twelve patients had a negative nasopharyngeal swab with a mean days since negativization of 138 ± 104 days, ranging from 23 to 331 days. Mean days of positivity to the nasal swab were 17 ± 17. Twenty-nine out of thirty (96.7%) samples were negative for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. In one sample, low SARS-CoV-2 load (Cycle threshold (Ct) 36.6.) was detected but not confirmed using an additional confirmatory assay. The conducted study demonstrates the absence of the viral genome within the analyzed cancellous bone. We think that the use of personal protection equipment (PPE) to only protect from aerosol produced during surgery, both in active and recovered patients, is not strictly necessary. We think that the use of PPE should not be employed by surgeons and the O.R. personnel to protect themselves from aerosols produced from the respiratory tract. Moreover, we think that our results could represent a valid basis for further studies related to the possibility of bone donation in patients that suffered and recovered from COVID-19.

"Letter to the editor: ‘The history of the development of the regular straight stem in hip arthroplasty’" published on 01 Feb 2024 by Bioscientifica Ltd.

In complex revision total hip arthroplasties, careful preoperative planning is crucial for the proper reconstruction of hip biomechanics. With conventional 2D radiographic images and computed tomography (CT) the 3D extension of the defect and the remaining bone stock may not be evaluated properly. 3D printed models can aid the surgeon in planning complex acetabular re-construction. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of bony defect assessment in severe acetabular defects surgery with 3D printing planning as compared to conventional 2D ra-diographic planning and CT. Twenty-five patients with severe acetabular defects (Paprosky IIC and III) undergoing revision surgery were enrolled. Each patient had a 3D printed model of their femur and pelvis created based on CT scans. Clinical and radiographic assessments were conducted before and after surgery, with four key bone landmarks measured and compared between X-ray, CT, 3D models, and surgical reports. The findings revealed discrepancies in defect assessment between different imaging methods. X-rays and CT scans sometimes incorrectly identified affected areas, while the 3D models showed more accurate results. This study suggests that 3D printed models can significantly improve the preoperative evaluation of complex hip arthroplasty revisions, enabling surgeons to better select optimal surgical strategies.

Background: Emerging parameters, such as the spino-pelvic unit and the combined sagittal index (CSI), are gaining importance in evaluating and optimizing implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our institution adopts the “femur first” technique to achieve the desired combined anteversion (CA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of the ‘femur first’ technique and spinopelvic characteristics in achieving the CSI_standing ‘safe zone’ in primary THA. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing primary THA were included in the present retrospective study. All patients underwent radiographic assessments in the standing position with the EOS 2D/3D radiography system. Results: Forty patients (40 hips) were enrolled. Of these, 34 patients fell inside the CSI_standing “safe zone” (205–245°). When considering the restricted CSI_standing “safe zone” for patients at high risk for adverse spinopelvic characteristics (215–245°), only 16 patients fell inside the range. We demonstrated a positive linear correlation between CSI_standing and CA (p < 0.0001). Pelvic tilt (PT) showed a positive correlation both in standing and relaxed sitting positions, (p < 0.001). Sacral slope (SS) showed a significant positive correlation in the relaxed sitting (p = 0.003) position but not in the standing position (p = 0.34). The correlation analysis between CSI_{relaxed-sitting} and ΔSS showed a positive correlation (p = 0.003). Conclusions: The “femur first” technique is able to achieve the CSI “safe zone” in most patients; however, it seems insufficient in those with adverse spinopelvic characteristics, who are at higher risk of dislocation. Moreover, the CA, the position of the pelvis in space (PT), and its mobility (ΔSS) greatly influence the CSI “safe zone” in patients undergoing primary THA.