The brain‐derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) is one of many genes thought to influence synaptic plasticity in the adult brain and shows a common single nucleotide polymorphism (BDNF Val66Met) in the normal population that is associated with differences in hippocampal volume and episodic memory. It is also thought to influence possible synaptic changes in motor cortex following a simple motor learning task. Here we extend these studies by using new non‐invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) techniques that directly test the excitability and plasticity of neuronal circuits in human motor cortex in subjects at rest. We investigated whether the susceptibility to TMS probes of plasticity is significantly influenced by the BDNF polymorphism. Val66Met carriers were matched with Val66Val individuals and tested on the following protocols: continuous and intermittent theta burst TMS; median nerve paired associative stimulation; and homeostatic plasticity in the TDCS/1 Hz rTMS model. The response of Met allele carriers differed significantly in all protocols compared with the response of Val66Val individuals. We suggest that this is due to the effect of BNDF on the susceptibility of synapses to undergo LTP/LTD. The circuits tested here are implicated in the pathophysiology of movement disorders such as dystonia and are being assessed as potential new targets in the treatment of stroke. Thus the polymorphism may be one factor that influences the natural response of the brain to injury and disease.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is emerging as a non-invasive therapeutic strategy in the battle against Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s disease patients primarily show alterations of the default mode network for which the precuneus is a key node. Here, we hypothesized that targeting the precuneus with TMS represents a promising strategy to slow down cognitive and functional decline in Alzheimer’s disease patients.We performed a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, phase 2, 24-week trial to determine the safety and efficacy of precuneus stimulation in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Fifty Alzheimer’s disease patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive precuneus or sham rTMS (mean age 73.7 years; 52% female). The trial included a 24-week treatment, with a 2-week intensive course in which rTMS (or sham) was applied daily five times per week, followed by a 22-week maintenance phase in which stimulation was applied once weekly. The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale–Sum of Boxes was selected as the primary outcome measure, in which post-treatment scores were compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included score changes in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale, Mini-Mental State Examination and Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living scale. Moreover, single-pulse TMS in combination with EEG was used to assess neurophysiological changes in precuneus cortical excitability and oscillatory activity.Our findings show that patients that received precuneus repetitive magnetic stimulation presented a stable performance of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale–Sum of Boxes score, whereas patients treated with sham showed a worsening of their score. Compared with the sham stimulation, patients in the precuneus stimulation group also showed also significantly better performances for the secondary outcome measures, including the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale, Mini-Mental State Examination and Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living scale. Neurophysiological results showed that precuneus cortical excitability remained unchanged after 24 weeks in the precuneus stimulation group, whereas it was significantly reduced in the sham group. Finally, we found an enhancement of local gamma oscillations in the group treated with precuneus stimulation but not in patients treated with sham.We conclude that 24 weeks of precuneus rTMS may slow down cognitive and functional decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Repetitive TMS targeting the default mode network could represent a novel therapeutic approach in Alzheimer’s disease patients.

Gait and balance impairment owing to limb deficit after stroke is one of the main determinants associated with poorer functional recovery.¹ Because gait is a critical determinant of independent living, improvement of walking function is one of the major goals of stroke rehabilitation.² Balance dysfunctions have substantial impact on functional independence and overall recovery.³ However, rehabilitation of gait in patients with stroke still lacks of advanced well-defined rehabilitation protocols. The contralesional cerebellum is strongly implicated in functional reorganization of the motor network after stroke when recovery takes place.^4,5 In animal models of stroke, the stimulation of cerebellar-cortical networks was found to improve functional recovery.^6,7 Notably, functional magnetic resonance imaging studies showed that activity in contralesional cerebellum positively correlates with gait recovery in patients with stroke.⁸ Patients often have to relearn simple motor strategies, a mechanism that is supposed to be actively controlled by the cerebellum.⁹ These types of cerebellar-mediated motor learning can be potentiated by simultaneous application of noninvasive brain stimulation methods,¹⁰ especially for gait and balance functions.¹¹ In particular, the neural activity of the cerebellum can be strongly activated by means of cerebellar intermittent θ-burst stimulation (CRB-iTBS),¹² a novel form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that mimics protocols inducing long-term potentiation in animal models.^13-16 On the basis of this background, we hypothesized that CRB-iTBS coupled with physiotherapy (PT) could improve gait and balance recovery in patients with stroke by enhancing motor relearning and promoting favorable cortical reorganization.

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive decline and dementia. Recent advances indicate that AD pathogenesis appears more complex than its mere neuropathology. Changes in synaptic plasticity, neuronal disarray and cell death are pathways commonly recognized as pathogenic mechanisms of AD. It is thought that the altered metabolism of certain membrane proteins may lead to the production of amyloid (Aβ) oligomers that are characterized by an highly toxic effect on neurotransmission pathways, such as those mediated by Acetylcholine. The interaction of Aβ oligomers with these neurotansmitters systems would in turn induce cell dysfunction, neurotransmitters signaling imbalance and finally lead to the appearance of neurological signs. In this perspective, it is still debated how and if these mechanisms may also engage the dopaminergic system in AD. Recent experimental work revealed that the dopaminergic system may well be involved in the occurrence of cognitive decline, often being predictive of rapidly progressive forms of AD. However a clear idea on the role of the dopamine system in AD is still missing. Here we review the more recent evidences supporting the notion that the dopaminergic dysfunction has a pathogenic role in cognitive decline symptoms of AD.