Objectives: The aim of this report is to assess the safety of endovascular treatment for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI). Although balloon angioplasty and stenting seem to be safe procedures, there are currently no data on the treatment of a large group of patients with this vascular pathology. Methods: A total of 564 endovascular procedures (balloon angioplasty or, if this procedure failed, stenting) were performed during 344 interventions in 331 CCSVI patients with associated multiple sclerosis. Results: Balloon angioplasty alone was performed in 192 cases (55.8%), whereas the stenting of at least one vein was required in the remaining 152 cases (44.2%). There were no major complications (severe bleeding, venous thrombosis, stent migration or injury to the nerves) related to the procedure, except for thrombotic occlusion of the stent in two cases (1.2% of stenting procedures) and surgical opening of femoral vein to remove angioplastic balloon in one case (0.3% of procedures). Minor complications included occasional technical problems (2.4% of procedures): difficulty removing the angioplastic balloon or problems with proper placement of stent, and other medical events (2.1% of procedures): local bleeding from the groin, minor gastrointestinal bleeding or cardiac arrhythmia. Conclusions: The procedures appeared to be safe and well tolerated by the patients, regardless of the actual impact of the endovascular treatments for venous pathology on the clinical course of multiple sclerosis, which warrants long-term follow-up.

The CHA2DS2-VASc score is widely used to stratify the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to assess whether the CHA2DS2-VASc score might be useful to identify patients at a high risk of ischemic stroke and death among individuals after acute myocardial infarction and with no history of atrial fibrillation. We analysed consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to our centre between 2003 and 2008. On the basis of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, four groups were distinguished: low-risk (1 point), intermediate-risk (2-3 points), high-risk (4-5 points) and very high-risk (>5 points). Data on long-term follow-up were screened to identify patients who experienced stroke or died during remote observation. Out of 2980 registry participants, 333 were excluded because of atrial fibrillation and/or ongoing therapy with oral anticoagulants. Finally, 2647 individuals were included into the analysis. An ischemic stroke occurred in 71 (2.68%) patients, whereas 439 (16.58%) died during a median follow-up of 41.5 months. The risk of stroke and death increased four-fold in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group (P < 0.001). Every point in the CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with 41% increase in stroke risk and 23% increase in mortality rate (for both P < 0.001). The mortality rate and risk of stroke were strongly associated with the CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Hence, this scoring system could be useful to identify high-risk patients with no history of atrial fibrillation, in whom additional preventive measures might be beneficial to improve the outcome.