Davide Crivelli

Dr. Davide Crivelli


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Composites Part B: Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJohn McCrory
John McCrory
Safaa Kh Al-jumailiSafaa Kh Al-jumaili
Safaa Kh Al-jumaili
DCDavide Crivelli
Davide Crivelli
MPMatthew Pearson
Matthew Pearson
Mark EatonMark Eaton
Mark Eaton
RPRhys Pullin
Rhys Pullin
Classifying the type of damage occurring within a structure using a structural health monitoring system can allow the end user to assess what kind of repairs, if any, that a component requires. This paper investigates the use of acoustic emission (AE) to locate and classify the type of damage occurring in a composite, carbon fibre panel during buckling. The damage was first located using a bespoke location algorithm developed at Cardiff University, called delta-T mapping. Signals identified as coming from the regions of damage were then analysed using three AE classification techniques; Artificial Neural Network (ANN) analysis, Unsupervised Waveform Clustering (UWC) and corrected Measured Amplitude Ratio (MAR). A comparison of results yielded by these techniques shows a strong agreement regarding the nature of the damage present in the panel, with the signals assigned to two different damage mechanisms, believed to be delamination and matrix cracking. Ultrasonic C-scan images and a digital image correlation (DIC) analysis of the buckled panel were used as validation. MAR’s ability to reveal the orientation of recorded signals greatly assisted the identification of the delamination region, however, ANN and UWC have the ability to group signals into several different classes, which would prove useful in instances where several damage mechanisms were generated. Combining each technique’s individual merits in a multi-technique analysis dramatically improved the reliability of the AE investigation and it is thought that this cross-correlation between techniques will also be the key to developing a reliable SHM system

1 June 2015 in Composites Part B: Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDavide Crivelli
Davide Crivelli
MGMARIO GUAGLIANO
MARIO GUAGLIANO
Mark EatonMark Eaton
Mark Eaton
MPMatthew Pearson
Matthew Pearson
SASafaa Al-Jumaili
Safaa Al-Jumaili
RPRhys Pullin
Rhys Pullin


1 October 2020 in International Journal of Fatigue
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michele CarboniMichele Carboni
Michele Carboni
DCDavide Crivelli
Davide Crivelli

1 October 2018 in Composites Part B: Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Safaa Kh Al-jumailiSafaa Kh Al-jumaili
Safaa Kh Al-jumaili
MEMark J. Eaton
Mark J. Eaton
KHKaren M. Holford
Karen M. Holford
MPMatthew R. Pearson
Matthew R. Pearson
DCDavide Crivelli
Davide Crivelli
Rhys PullinRhys Pullin
Rhys Pullin

24 October 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Usama KadriUsama Kadri
Usama Kadri
DCDavide Crivelli
Davide Crivelli
WPWade Parsons
Wade Parsons
BCBruce Colbourne
Bruce Colbourne
ARAmanda Ryan
Amanda Ryan
Analysis of data, recorded on March 8th 2014 at the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation’s hydroacoustic stations off Cape Leeuwin Western Australia, and at Diego Garcia, reveal unique pressure signatures that could be associated with objects impacting at the sea surface, such as falling meteorites, or the missing Malaysian Aeroplane MH370. To examine the recorded signatures, we carried out experiments with spheres impacting at the surface of a water tank, where we observed almost identical pressure signature structures. While the pressure structure is unique to impacting objects, the evolution of the radiated acoustic waves carries information on the source. Employing acoustic–gravity wave theory we present an analytical inverse method to retrieve the impact time and location. The solution was validated using field observations of recent earthquakes, where we were able to calculate the eruption time and location to a satisfactory degree of accuracy. Moreover, numerical validations confirm an error below 0.02% for events at relatively large distances of over 1000 km. The method can be developed to calculate other essential properties such as impact duration and geometry. Besides impacting objects and earthquakes, the method could help in identifying the location of underwater explosions and landslides.