Background: Several inflammatory response materials could be used for prediction of prognosis of cancer patients. The neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been introduced for prognostic scoring system in various cancers. The objective of this study was to determine whether the NLR or the PLR would predict the clinical outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin/ 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX).Methods: The study population consisted of 174 advanced gastric cancer patients. Patients were treated with 85 mg/m²of oxaliplatin as a 2-h infusion at day 1 plus 20 mg/m²of leucovorin over 10 min, followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m²and 22-h continuous infusion of 600 mg/m²at days 1-2. Treatment was repeated in 2-week intervals. The NLR and PLR were calculated from complete blood counts in laboratory test before and after first cycle of chemotherapy.Results: NLR was a useful prognostic biomarker for predicting inferior overall survival (OS) (p= 0.005), but was not associated with progression free survival (PFS) (p= 0.461). The normalization of NLR after one cycle of chemotherapy was found to be in association with significant improvement in PFS (5.3 months vs. 2.4 months,p< 0.001), and OS (11.9 months vs. 4.6 months,p< 0.001). The normalization of PLR was also associated with longer PFS (5.6 months vs. 3.4 months,p= 0.006), and OS (16.9 months vs. 10.9 months,p= 0.002). In multivariate analysis, changes in NLR were associated with PFS (Hazard ratio (HR): 2.297, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.429-3.693,p= 0.001). The NLR, (HR: 0.245, 95% CI: 0.092-0.633,p= 0.004), PLR (HR: 0.347, 95% CI: 0.142-0.847,p= 0.020), changes in NLR (HR: 2.468, 95% CI: 1.567-3.886,p< 0.001), and changes in PLR (HR: 1.473, 95% CI: 1.038-2.090,p= 0.030) were independent prognostic markers for OS.Conclusion: This study demonstrates that NLR, PLR, and changes in NLR or PLR are independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy. These specific factors may also help in identifying the patients, who are more sensitive to FOLFOX regimen.

The objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the adrenal gland. Thirty one patients diagnosed with primary adrenal DLBCL from 14 Korean institutions and treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) were analyzed. Complete remission (CR) and overall response rate after R-CHOP chemotherapy were 54.8% and 87.0%. The 2-year estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 68.3% and 51.1%. In patients achieving CR, significant prolongations of OS (P = 0.029) and PFS (P = 0.005) were observed. Ann Arbor stage had no influence on OS. There was no significant difference in OS between patients with unilateral involvement of adrenal gland and those with bilateral involvement. When staging was modified to include bilateral adrenal involvement as one extranodal site, early stage (I or II) significantly correlated with longer OS (P = 0.021) and PFS (P < 0.001). Contrary to prior reports, our data suggests that outcomes of primary adrenal DLBCL are encouraging using a regimen of R-CHOP, and that achieving CR after R-CHOP is predictive of survival. Likewise, our modified staging system may have prognostic value.

The mechanisms of epidermal growth factor (EGF) affecting EGF receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-related skin toxicities are as yet unknown. We investigated which mechanisms are involved in EGF’s positive effects. Two types of EGFRIs, cetuximab and gefitinib, were used to treat the cells or 3d-cultured human skin tissue with recombinant human EGF (rhEGF). As a result, rhEGF increased EGFR and pEGFR expression. Furthermore, rhEGF induces EGFR signaling by pAKT and pPI3K expression in gefitinib and rhEGF co-treated cells. In addition, rhEGF bound to EGFR after than cetuximab, but cetuximab bound to EGFR more strongly than rhEGF. Moreover, expressions of proliferation and differentiation proteins, both ki-67 and filaggrin, were decreased in EGFRI-treated tissue. However, in rhEGF and EGFRI co-treated tissue, those expressions were increased. Expression of IL-1α, IL-8, and TNF-α was increased by EGFRIs and down-regulated by rhEGF. Furthermore, hBD-2 and hBD-3 protein expressions were inhibited by cetuximab or gefitinib treatment, and those decrements were increased by rhEGF treatment. In patients’ tissue evaluation, compared with controls, patients’ Ki-67 and EGFR expression were decreased (p = 0.015, p = 0.001). Patients’ IL-17 and TNF-α expression intensity was higher than that of the control group (p = 0.038, p = 0.037). After treatment with EGF ointment, average values of Ki-67, EGFR, and Melan-A were changed to normal values. Oppositely, patients’ proportions of IL-17 and TNF-α were decreased to low stain level. In conclusion, treatment of rhEGF improved EGFRI-induced skin eruption via normalizing the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes, reducing inflammatory cytokines by the affected EGFRIs.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the associations between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and clinical outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX).

Background: The response rate and survival improvement for rituximab, a CD20‐targeting monoclonal antibody, have been demonstrated in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapeutic regimens, yet relapses still occur despite treatment completion. Thus, extending the period of remission in MZL patients remains an essential goal. This multicenter, single‐arm, open‐label phase II study evaluated the survival efficacy of 2 years of rituximab‐maintenance therapy in patients with stage III–IV CD20‐positive MZL who had responded to first‐line R–CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone). The objective of this study was to determine whether rituximab maintenance following R–CVP warrants further investigation. Methods: Prior to rituximab‐maintenance therapy, patients received 6–8 cycles of first‐line R–CVP therapy for stage III–IV MZL. Rituximab (375 mg/m ² ), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m ² ), and vincristine (1.4 mg/m ² ; maximum 2 mg) were administered via an intravenous infusion on day 1 of each 3‐week cycle, while oral prednisolone (100 mg) was given on days 1–5 of each 3‐week cycle. The patients who achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) to R–CVP treatment, were prescribed rituximab‐maintenance therapy which was administered intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m ² every 8 weeks for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and treatment safety. Results: 47 patients were enrolled, of whom, 45 (96%) received rituximab‐maintenance treatment. Fifteen (33%) patients had nodal MZL. Following R–CVP first‐line therapy, 20 (44%), 22 (49%), and 3 (7%) patients achieved CR, PR, and SD, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 38.2 months, their observed 3‐year PFS rate was 81%. During the rituximab‐maintenance, 6 PR and 1 SD patients achieved CR following the administration of R–CVP. Elevated LDH and the presence of B symptoms were found to be significant prognostic factors for PFS ( P = 0.003) and demonstrated a 3‐year OS rate of 90%. Rituximab‐maintenance therapy was well tolerated, and the common treatment‐emergent adverse events were sensory neuropathy (18%), myalgia (13%), fatigue (9%), and neutropenia (9%). Conclusion: Rituximab‐maintenance therapy following first‐line R–CVP demonstrated good PFS in patients with stage III–IV MZL, in addition to a favorable toxicity profile. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01213095

Background: With the development of immunology, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely used in various cancer treatments. Although some patients can benefit from ICIs, other patients have no response to ICIs or suffer from hyperprogression. There has been no biomarker for predicting the efficacy of ICIs. Thus, the objective of this study was to find biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of ICIs using peripheral blood. Methods: Adults patients planned to be treated with ICIs were enrolled in this study. Blood sampling was carried out before and after administration of ICIs. Changes of immune cell fraction were analyzed for each patient. Results: Among 182 patients enrolled, immune cell analysis was performed for 90 patients. The objective response rate was 14.4% (n = 13/90). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.1–8.9 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 13.9 months (95% CI: 5.6–22.2 months). Significant benefits in ORR and OS were shown for patients with increased NKp46-/CD56+ NK cells (p = 0.033 and p = 0.013, respectively). The PFS tended to be longer in these patients, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.050). Conclusion: Changes of immune cell fraction before and after administration of ICIs could be a novel biomarker for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy.