shengda ye

Dr. shengda ye

Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 September 2022 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYshengda ye
shengda ye
BYBin Yang
Bin Yang
TZtingbao zhang
tingbao zhang
WWWei Wei
Wei Wei
ZLZhi-Qiang Li
Zhi-Qiang Li
XLXiang Li
Xiang Li
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM), which has a poor prognosis, accounts for 31% of all cancers in the brain and central nervous system. There is a paucity of research on prognostic indicators associated with the tumor immune microenvironment in GBM patients. Accurate tools for risk assessment of GBM patients are urgently needed. Methods: In this study, we used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differentially expressed gene (DEG) methods to screen out GBM-related genes among immune-related genes (IRGs). Then, we used survival analysis and Cox regression analysis to identify prognostic genes among the GBM-related genes to further establish a risk signature, which was validated using methods including ROC analysis, stratification analysis, protein expression level validation (HPA), gene expression level validation based on public cohorts, and RT-qPCR. In order to provide clinicians with a useful tool to predict survival, a nomogram based on an assessment of IRGs and clinicopathological features was constructed and further validated using DCA, time-dependent ROC curve, etc. Results: Three immune-related genes were found: PPP4C (p < 0.001, HR = 0.514), C5AR1 (p < 0.001, HR = 1.215), and IL-10 (p < 0.001, HR = 1.047). An immune-related prognostic signature (IPS) was built to calculate risk scores for GBM patients; patients classified into different risk groups had significant differences in survival (p = 0.006). Then, we constructed a nomogram based on an assessment of the IRG-based signature, which was validated as a potential prediction tool for GBM survival rates, showing greater accuracy than the nomogram without the IPS when predicting 1-year (0.35 < Pt < 0.50), 3-year (0.65 < Pt < 0.80), and 5-year (0.65 < Pt < 0.80) survival. Conclusions: In conclusion, we integrated bioinformatics and experimental approaches to construct an IPS and a nomogram based on IPS for predicting GBM prognosis. The signature showed strong potential for prognostic prediction and could help in developing more precise diagnostic approaches and treatments for GBM.

19 June 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYuan Wang
Yuan Wang
SYshengda ye
shengda ye
DWDu Wu
Du Wu
ZXZiyue Xu
Ziyue Xu
WWWei Wei
Wei Wei
MLMing Luo
Ming Luo
Background: Low-grade gliomas (LGGs), which are the second most common intracranial tumor, are diagnosed in seven out of one million people, tending to develop in younger people. Tumor stem cells and immune cells are important in the development of tumorigenesis. However, research on prognostic factors linked to the immune microenvironment and stem cells in LGG patients is limited. We critically need accurate related tools for assessing the risk of LGG patients. Methods: In this study, we aimed to identify immune-related genes (IRGs) in LGG based on the mRNAsi score. We employed differentially expressed gene (DEG) methods and weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA). The risk signature was then further established using a lasso Cox regression analysis and a multivariate Cox analysis. Next, we used immunohistochemical sections (HPA) and a survival analysis to identify the hub genes. A nomogram was built to assess the prognosis of patients based on their clinical information and risk scores and was validated using a DCA curve, among other methods. Results: Four hub genes were obtained: C3AR1 (HR = 0.98, p < 0.001), MSR1 (HR = 1.02, p < 0.001), SLC11A1 (HR = 1.01, p < 0.01), and IL-10 (HR = 1.01, p < 0.001). For LGG patients, we created an immune-related prognostic signature (IPS) based on mRNAsi for estimating risk scores; different risk groups showed significantly different survival rates (p = 3.3 × 10−16). Then, via an evaluation of the IRG-related signature, we created a nomogram for predicting LGG survival probability. Conclusion: The outcome suggests that, when predicting the prognosis of LGG patients, our nomogram was more effective than the IPS. In this study, four immune-related predictive biomarkers for LGG were identified and proven to be IRGs. Therefore, the development of efficient immunotherapy techniques can be facilitated by the creation of the IPS.