Background/Objectives: Adenomyosis is a debilitating gynecologic condition that affects both multiparous older women and nulliparous younger women, inducing a variety of symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, and infertility. Thermal ablation techniques are new procedures that have been proposed for the treatment of adenomyosis. They include high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Because thermal ablation techniques are minimally invasive or noninvasive, fertility is not impaired while symptoms improve. In addition, hospital stays and financial costs are generally reduced, increasing the interest in these alternative management options. Methods: In this narrative review, we conducted a thorough literature search of PubMed/Medline from the database inception to September 2022. In our search, we focused on noninvasive treatment methods such as HIFU ablation, RFA ablation, and PMWA as well as adenomyosis-specific terms and noninvasive techniques (ultrasonography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging). The queries were a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. The search was limited to the English language. Abstracts were screened according to their content, and relevant articles were selected. Results: Overall, the results showed that the above-mentioned ablation techniques are effective and safe in providing adenomyosis treatment. Lesion size and uterus volume are reduced, leading to considerable symptom alleviation with all three methods. Positive results concerning safety and fertility preservation have been described as well. Conclusions: Nonetheless, more research is required in this field to compare the efficacy and safety of different ablation techniques with traditional therapies. Such research will help improve these procedures and their associated decision-making processes.

Our aim was to assess the opinion of a panel of experts and obtain a consensus on the management of endometrial cancer in France and French Switzerland. A Delphi survey was carried out among a panel of French and French-speaking Swiss experts. The first questionnaire included 65 questions divided into eight categories: characterization of experts, histo-molecular characteristics and radiological data of endometrial cancer, and management of low-risk, intermediate-risk, intermediate–high-risk, high-risk, and metastatic cancers. The experts were asked to reply on a 9-point scale, both on the validity and the clarity of each question. After the answers were analyzed, a second questionnaire was sent to the same experts. The study took place between December 2021 and March 2022. Further, 58 (57.4%) of the 101 experts responded in the first round, and 39 recommendations were obtained (60%). Six questions were voted redundant and 20 discordant. These questions were reformulated, and, at the end of the second round, 17 recommendations were validated (85%). In total, the study presents an analysis of 56 questions and related responses. Expert advice helps to clarify non-consensual issues, standardize the management of endometrial cancer, and optimize clinical practices.

Background: Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and, in particular, bowel endometriosis stand out for their complexity. While surgery for bowel endometriosis has proven to be effective, there is a lack of standardization concerning the technique used and the reported outcomes. Objectives: The objective is to perform a review aiming to summarize the state of the art of bowel endometriosis and to point out the gaps to be addressed by future research. We also propose a novel classification of surgical procedures to fill these gaps and improve management. Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed from inception to October 2025. Results: The following three major procedures for the excision of bowel endometriosis have been proposed: the nodule shaving, the discoid excision, and the segmental intestinal resection. One further technique, NOSE (natural orifice specimen extraction), can be applied for the removal of the specimen in cases of discoid or segmental resection. To reduce surgical morbidity, current data support the choice of most conservative surgical options, namely nodule dissection and discoid resection, as well as the use of nerve-sparing techniques in case of segmental resection. Nonetheless, there is little evidence concerning the indication and the most appropriate technique to be used, including their relative risks and benefits in terms of pain control, urinary and gastrointestinal function, risk of future relapse, and fertility outcomes. Conclusions: Significant barriers in comparing surgical outcomes due to unclear definitions, lack of standardization, and incomplete reporting are some of the most relevant issues frequently encountered. To fill these gaps, we propose a new classification system for bowel surgery that describes the dimension and the number of the lesions, as well as the type of surgical technique used, supplemented by the information if vaginal opening was necessary for complete lesion resection. This proposition aims to open a discussion on this topic and boost focused research to evaluate the utility of a new classification in clinical practice.

Endometriosis is a debilitating disease that affects millions worldwide

Enhancing clinical practice: the Endoscore app for automated surgical data capture and endometriosis scoring - Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn