Jordanna Santos Monteiro

Dr. Jordanna Santos Monteiro

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 March 2021 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJordanna Santos Monteiro
Jordanna Santos Monteiro
PFPriscila Farage
Priscila Farage
Renata Puppin ZandonadiRenata Puppin Zandonadi
Renata Puppin Zandonadi
RBRaquel Braz Assunção Botelho
Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho
Livia de Lacerda de Lacerda de OliveiraLivia de Lacerda de Lacerda de Oliveira
Livia de Lacerda de Lacerda de Oliveira
Wilma Maria Coelho AraujoWilma Maria Coelho Araujo
Wilma Maria Coelho Araujo
This study aimed to perform a systematic review on gluten-free bread formulations using specific volumes as a quality indicator. In this systematic review, we identified 259 studies that met inclusion criteria. From these studies, 43 met the requirements of having gluten-free bread with a specific volume greater than or equal to 3.5 cm3/g. Other parameters such as the texture profile, color (crumb and crust), and sensory analysis examined in these studies were presented. The formulations that best compensated the lack of the gluten-network were based on the combination of rice flour, rice flour with low amylose content, maize flour, rice starch, corn starch, potato starch, starch with proteins and added with transglutaminase (TGase), and hydrocolloids like hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC). Of the 43 studies, three did not present risk of bias, and the only parameter evaluated in common in the studies was the specific volume. However, it is necessary to jointly analyze other parameters that contribute to the quality, such as texture profile, external and internal characteristics, acceptability, and useful life of the bread, especially since it is a product obtained through raw materials and unconventional ingredients.

30 March 2018 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PHPatrícia Hinnig
Patrícia Hinnig
JMJordanna Santos Monteiro
Jordanna Santos Monteiro
MAMaria Alice Assis
Maria Alice Assis
RLRenata Bertazzi Levy
Renata Bertazzi Levy
MPMarco Peres Peres
Marco Peres Peres
GCGraziela De Luca Canto
Graziela De Luca Canto
The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the associations among education, income and dietary pattern (DP) in children and adolescents from high, medium and low human development countries (HHDC, MHDC and LHDC, respectively). Observational studies that evaluated the association between family income or education with the DP are obtained through electronic database searches. Forty articles are selected for review. In HHDC, education is inversely associated with “unhealthy” DP and positively associated with “healthy” DP. In cross-sectional studies from HHDC, higher income is negatively associated with “unhealthy” DP. In MHDC, there is no association between the socioeconomic variables (SE) and the DPs, although, in some studies, the unhealthy diet is positively associated with SE. Only one study conducted in LHDC showed an inverse association between income/education with “unhealthy” DP and there is no association between the SE and “healthy” DP. In conclusion, children and adolescents living in HHDC with high parental education tend to have a healthier diet. In MHDC, although an unhealthy diet is found among the high-income and educated population, the associations are not clear. Additional research is needed to clarify the associations between income and education with “unhealthy” and “healthy” DPs in MHDC and LHDC.

22 December 2018 in Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAna Luisa Falcomer
Ana Luisa Falcomer
LALetícia Santos Araújo
Letícia Santos Araújo
PFPriscila Farage
Priscila Farage
JMJordanna Santos Monteiro
Jordanna Santos Monteiro
Eduardo Yoshio NakanoEduardo Yoshio Nakano
Eduardo Yoshio Nakano
Renata Puppin ZandonadiRenata Puppin Zandonadi
Renata Puppin Zandonadi
Gluten-related disorders (GRD) affects approximately 10% of the general population. The only treatment for GRD is still so far is the lifelong complete exclusion of gluten from the daily diet. The correct information about the presence/absence of gluten in food is very important to this group. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of gluten contamination in gluten-free industrial and non-industrial products. In this systematic review, 24 cross-sectional studies were analyzed. The authors developed specific search strategies for Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. The authors evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies using criteria from Meta-analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (MASTARI). We performed the statistical meta-analysis by metafor package of R program. 95.83% (n = 23) of the studies presented positive results for contamination (over 20 ppm). In industrial food products, studies showed a contamination prevalence of 13.2% (95% CI: 10.8%–15.7%). In non-industrial food products, studies showed a contamination prevalence of 41.5% (95% CI: 16.6%–66.4%). Despite the non-industrial products presented higher contamination prevalence than the industrial products, the difference was not significant (p = 0.072). The findings indicate cross-contamination in industrialized and non-industrialized products. As expected, industrial products labeled as gluten-free showed a lower percentage of gluten-contamination than non-industrialized. Despite that, any contaminated sample found in this group present greater relevance than non-labeled foods. It indicates that foods labeled as “gluten-free” should not be considered safe for patients with GRD since information on the label regarding the presence/absence of gluten is unreliable. Therefore, any gluten-contamination in products labeled as gluten-free is a serious problem to whom present GRD. Further studies are needed to estimate gluten cross-contamination in food service meals and industry better.

10 August 2022 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJordanna Santos Monteiro
Jordanna Santos Monteiro
Eduardo Yoshio NakanoEduardo Yoshio Nakano
Eduardo Yoshio Nakano
Renata Puppin ZandonadiRenata Puppin Zandonadi
Renata Puppin Zandonadi
RBRaquel Braz Assunção Botelho
Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho
Wilma Maria Coelho AraujoWilma Maria Coelho Araujo
Wilma Maria Coelho Araujo
Food guides are official documents that guide consumers’ food choices. They inform the qualitative classification of food groups and messages on how to adopt a healthy diet. The classifications and nomenclatures adopted in these documents vary according to cultural, nutritional, and scientific criteria. This study aimed to evaluate the understanding of Brazilian consumers regarding food classification according to the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population (FGBP) concepts. An instrument was constructed to assess consumer understanding. It was named “Understanding of the Level of Processing of Food” (ULPF) and validated according to the concepts of constructs presented by psychometrics such as the Delphi methodology. The instrument was composed of 36 items approved by experts (concordance > 80% and with good internal consistency). A total of 2333 Brazilians from all regions participated in the study. The results suggest that food classification according to the level of processing was difficult for participants to understand. About 85% of them did not understand or did not know the definitions and classification of food and preparations according to food and science technology (FST) and the FGBP. More than 50% of the participants believed that it was easier to classify food according to food groups.

18 October 2023 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJordanna Santos Monteiro
Jordanna Santos Monteiro
RBRaquel Braz Assunção Botelho
Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho
Renata Puppin ZandonadiRenata Puppin Zandonadi
Renata Puppin Zandonadi
Wilma Maria Coelho AraujoWilma Maria Coelho Araujo
Wilma Maria Coelho Araujo
The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed the dietary guidelines presented as the Food-based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG). The FBDG classify foods according to their origin, nature, nutrient source, food group, and processing level. Food science and technology (FST) ranks food according to its origin, perishability, nutrient source, processing, food group, and formulation. This paper aimed to compare the convergence points for food classification according to the FBDG and FST. This study was carried out in two phases. The first step was identifying the Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG). For each of the FBDG, food items were grouped as fruits, vegetables, cereals, sugars, fat and oils, legumes, foods from animals, dairy products, and others. The second step aimed to identify and describe the different food classification systems. The search was performed on PubMed®, Science Direct, and Web of Science and websites of international organizations such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Codex Alimentarius. Our results show that the points of convergence between the classifications were the classification in terms of origin (animal and vegetable), nutrient sources, and food groups. However, inconsistencies were observed for the distribution of food items in each group in the 98 surveyed FBDG. As for nature, there was a convergence for in natura, minimally processed, and processed foods. However, the criteria adopted for minimally processed and processed foods described in the FBDG differ from those considered by the FST. FST also does not recognize the classification of foods concerning the level of processing.

1 February 2018 in Revista de Nutrição
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GAGéssica Mercia de Almeida
Géssica Mercia de Almeida
KOKlébya Hellen Dantas de Oliveira
Klébya Hellen Dantas de Oliveira
JMJordanna Santos Monteiro
Jordanna Santos Monteiro
MMMaria Angélica Tavares de Medeiros
Maria Angélica Tavares de Medeiros
ERElisabetta Recine
Elisabetta Recine
The present systematic review aimed to synthesize the findings of studies in the literature on the educational training of nutritionists in Public Health. The study was conducted by searching international databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Lilacs, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science), as well as in the gray literature. The steps of systematic search followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporing Itens for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Eligibility criteria included studies on the Public Health training in Nutrition Undergraduate courses, whose subjects were students, educators, and professionals who practice in the field of Nutrition. A total of 633 articles were identified, of which, 66 were eligible for reading and analysis of the full text and 12 were included in the systematic review. Of these, five of these 12 articles used quantitative methods, 3 used mixed methods, and 4 used exclusively qualitative methods. There was high heterogeneity among the studies, such as different samples, subjects, and evaluation methods. The studies included were carried out from 2008 to 2017 in 28 different countries, including Brazil, Canada, Vietnam, and some European countries. In most of these articles, Public Health was one of the main areas in the formal education of nutritionists, with predominant traditional teaching approach, with a biological focus and a fragmented curricular structure. The included studies were evaluated with low risk of bias. In spite of the limitations identified in the professional training of nutritionists, there was a clear emphasis on the importance of the relationship between theory and practice, teaching-research-extension approaches, and practical activities or internships in Public Health, which can promote the development of skills and competencies that can exert an impact on their professional performance.