Maddalena Boccia

Dr. Maddalena Boccia

Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 August 2015 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMaddalena Boccia
Maddalena Boccia
Laura PiccardiLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi
Liana PalermoLiana Palermo
Liana Palermo
RNRaffaella Nori
Raffaella Nori
Massimiliano PalmieroMassimiliano Palmiero
Massimiliano Palmiero
Many studies have assessed the neural underpinnings of creativity, failing to find a clear anatomical localization. We aimed to provide evidence for a multi-componential neural system for creativity. We applied a general activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to 45 fMRI studies. Three individual ALE analyses were performed to assess creativity in different cognitive domains (Musical, Verbal, and Visuo-spatial). The general ALE revealed that creativity relies on clusters of activations in the bilateral occipital, parietal, frontal, and temporal lobes. The individual ALE revealed different maximal activation in different domains. Musical creativity yields activations in the bilateral medial frontal gyrus, in the left cingulate gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule and in the right postcentral and fusiform gyri. Verbal creativity yields activations mainly located in the left hemisphere, in the prefrontal cortex, middle and superior temporal gyri, inferior parietal lobule, postcentral and supramarginal gyri, middle occipital gyrus, and insula. The right inferior frontal gyrus and the lingual gyrus were also activated. Visuo-spatial creativity activates the right middle and inferior frontal gyri, the bilateral thalamus and the left precentral gyrus. This evidence suggests that creativity relies on multi-componential neural networks and that different creativity domains depend on different brain regions.

1 February 2014 in Neuropsychology Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaddalena Boccia
Maddalena Boccia
FNFederico Nemmi
Federico Nemmi
Cecilia GuarigliaCecilia Guariglia
Cecilia Guariglia
In the past 20 years, many studies in the cognitive neurosciences have analyzed human ability to navigate in recently learned and familiar environments by investigating the cognitive processes involved in successful navigation. In this study, we reviewed the main experimental paradigms and made a cognitive-oriented meta-analysis of fMRI studies of human navigation to underline the importance of the experimental designs and cognitive tasks used to assess navigational skills. We performed a general activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of 66 fMRI experiments to identify the neural substrates underpinning general aspects of human navigation. Four individual ALE analyses were performed to identify the neural substrates of different experimental paradigms (i.e., familiar vs. recently learned environments) and different navigational strategies (allocentric vs. egocentric). Results of the general ALE analysis highlighted a wide network of areas with clusters in the occipital, parietal, frontal and temporal lobes, especially in the parahippocampal cortex. Familiar environments seem to be processed by an extended temporal-frontal network, whereas recently learned environments require activation in the parahippocampal cortex and the parietal and occipital lobes. Allocentric strategy is subtended by the same areas as egocentric strategy, but the latter elicits greater activation in the right precuneus, middle occipital lobe and angular gyrus. Our results suggest that different neural correlates are involved in recalling a well-learned or recently acquired environment and that different networks of areas subtend egocentric and allocentric strategies.

26 April 2015 in Brain Imaging and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMaddalena Boccia
Maddalena Boccia
SDSimonetta D'Amico
Simonetta D'Amico
FBFilippo Bianchini
Filippo Bianchini
AMAssunta Marano
Assunta Marano
AGAnna Maria Giannini
Anna Maria Giannini
Laura PiccardiLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi

4 June 2015 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaddalena Boccia
Maddalena Boccia
Laura PiccardiLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi
Paola GuarigliaPaola Guariglia
Paola Guariglia
Over the past decade mind and body practices, such as yoga and meditation, have raised interest in different scientific fields; in particular, the physiological mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects observed in meditators have been investigated. Neuroimaging studies have studied the effects of meditation on brain structure and function and findings have helped clarify the biological underpinnings of the positive effects of meditation practice and the possible integration of this technique in standard therapy. The large amount of data collected thus far allows drawing some conclusions about the neural effects of meditation practice. In the present study we used activation likelihood estimation (ALE) analysis to make a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data on the effects of meditation on brain structure and function. Results indicate that meditation leads to activation in brain areas involved in processing self-relevant information, self-regulation, focused problem-solving, adaptive behavior, and interoception. Results also show that meditation practice induces functional and structural brain modifications in expert meditators, especially in areas involved in self-referential processes such as self-awareness and self-regulation. These results demonstrate that a biological substrate underlies the positive pervasive effect of meditation practice and suggest that meditation techniques could be adopted in clinical populations and to prevent disease.

1 January 2016 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMaddalena Boccia
Maddalena Boccia
SBS. Barbetti
S. Barbetti
LPL. Piccardi
L. Piccardi
Cecilia GuarigliaCecilia Guariglia
Cecilia Guariglia
FFF. Ferlazzo
F. Ferlazzo
DZD.W. Zaidel
D.W. Zaidel

9 July 2016 in American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCStefano Colangeli
Stefano Colangeli
MBMaddalena Boccia
Maddalena Boccia
PVPaola Verde
Paola Verde
PGPaola Guariglia
Paola Guariglia
FBFilippo Bianchini
Filippo Bianchini
LPLaura Piccardi
Laura Piccardi
Cognitive reserve (CR) has been defined as the ability to optimize or maximize performance through differential recruitment of brain networks. In the present study, we aimed at providing evidence for a consistent brain network underpinning CR in healthy and pathological aging. To pursue this aim, we performed a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 17 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies on CR proxies in healthy aging, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We found that different brain areas were associated with CR proxies in healthy and pathological aging. A wide network of areas, including medial and lateral frontal areas, that is, anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as well as precuneus, was associated with proxies of CR in healthy elderly patients. The CR proxies in patients with AD and amnesic-MCI were associated with activation in the anterior cingulate cortex. These results were discussed hypothesizing the existence of possible compensatory mechanisms in healthy and pathological aging.