The pathogenesis of chronic wounds (CW) involves a multifaceted interplay of biochemical, immunological, hematological, and microbiological interactions. Biofilm development is a significant virulence trait which enhances microbial survival and pathogenicity and has various implications on the development and management of CW. Biofilms induce a prolonged suboptimal inflammation in the wound microenvironment, associated with delayed healing. The composition of wound fluid (WF) adds more complexity to the subject, with proven pro-inflammatory properties and an intricate crosstalk among cytokines, chemokines, microRNAs, proteases, growth factors, and ECM components. One approach to achieve information on the mechanisms of disease progression and therapeutic response is the use of multiple high-throughput ‘OMIC’ modalities (genomic, proteomic, lipidomic, metabolomic assays), facilitating the discovery of potential biomarkers for wound healing, which may represent a breakthrough in this field and a major help in addressing delayed wound healing. In this review article, we aim to summarize the current progress achieved in host–microbiome crosstalk in the spectrum of CW healing and highlight future innovative strategies to boost the host immune response against infections, focusing on the interaction between pathogens and their hosts (for instance, by harnessing microorganisms like probiotics), which may serve as the prospective advancement of vaccines and treatments against infections.

Ultrasonography is a well-tolerated procedure that aids in the targeted esthetic therapies of special cutaneous regions, as well as in the prevention (vascular mapping, identification of previous filler, and others) and management of potential complications (vascular occlusion, external vascular compression, product misplacement or migration, inflammatory reactions, and others). It has lately been promoted as the first-line imaging tool to address injectables. In this article, we aim to review the evolving role of ultrasonography in cosmetic filler procedures, from the fundamental ultrasound characterization of cosmetic fillers to the ultrasound-enhanced detection and management of cosmetic filler complications, including ultrasound’s role in hyaluronidase-guided injections for cosmetic filler dissolution. Furthermore, the paper explores the integral role played by ultrasound in enhancing the precision, efficacy, and safety of additional minimally invasive aesthetic techniques such as mesotherapy, radiofrequency, cryolipolysis, and polydioxanone procedures.

Tattooing is the procedure of implanting permanent pigment granules and additives into the dermal layer of the skin, serving various purposes such as decoration, medical identification, or accidental markings. There has been a significant rise in the popularity of decorative tattooing as a form of body art among both teenagers and young adults. Thus, the incidence of tattoos is increasing, with expanding applications such as permanent makeup, scar camouflage, nipple–areola, lips, and eyebrows tattooing, and utilization in oncological radiotherapy such as colon marking. However, there have been reported a broad range of adverse reactions linked to tattooing, encompassing allergic reactions, superficial and deep cutaneous infections, autoimmune disorders induced by the Koebner phenomenon, cutaneous tumors, and others. These reactions exhibit different onset times for symptoms, ranging from immediate manifestations after tattoo application to symptoms emerging several years later. Given the limited information on a tattoo’s side effects, this review aims to elucidate the clinical spectrum of cutaneous complications of tattoos in different patients. The analysis will investigate both allergic and nonallergic clinical presentations of tattoo-related side effects, microscopic findings from skin biopsies, and therapeutic outcomes. This exploration is essential to improve our understanding of tattoo-related cutaneous complications and associated differential diagnoses and highlight the significance of patient awareness regarding potential risks before getting a tattoo.

Background/Objectives: Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) is a glycoprotein commonly overexpressed in epithelial ovarian cancer and widely recognized as a tumor marker. However, elevated CA125 levels are also observed in various non-malignant conditions, including diseases affecting mucosal surfaces, pleural or peritoneal effusions, cirrhosis (with or without ascites), endometriosis, uterine fibroids, adenomyosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and pregnancy. This review aims to explore the role of CA125 in non-malignant serous effusions, highlighting its diagnostic and prognostic potential beyond the realm of oncology. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases and clinical trial registries. Eligible studies included full-text original research articles, reviews, and case reports published in English over the past 10 years. Inclusion criteria were limited to studies involving human subjects and focused on the role of CA125 in non-malignant serous effusions. Results: CA125 is produced by coelomic epithelial cells lining the ovary, pleura, pericardium, and peritoneum. Its serum concentration is not significantly influenced by age, body weight, or renal function, even in the advanced stages of the disease. In peritoneal conditions, CA125 is synthesized by mesothelial cells and serves as a potential marker of peritoneal involvement. The prevailing pathophysiological mechanism suggests that mechanical stretching of mesothelial cells due to ascitic pressure stimulates CA125 release. Similarly, in heart failure, mesothelial cells of the pericardium produce CA125, which correlates with congestion severity, supports risk stratification, and may inform diuretic therapy. Conclusions: While a threshold of 35 U/mL is established for malignancy, no standardized cutoff exists for CA125 in non-malignant conditions. The utility of CA125 measurement in peritoneal, pleural, or pericardial effusions—and cardiovascular diseases such as acute heart failure—for purposes of differential diagnosis, treatment guidance, or prognostication warrants further investigation through prospective clinical trials.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disorder, constituting approximately 2% of all clinical cases of angioedema, with a global prevalence estimated between 1 in 50,000 and 1 in 150,000 individuals. The condition affects individuals of all genders and ethnic backgrounds without significant variation. HAE is classified into three types. Type I HAE, which accounts for 85% of cases, is characterized by a deficiency of the C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) gene. Type II HAE, making up 15% of cases, involves a dysfunctional C1-INH. Type III HAE, which represents about 5% to 10% of cases, is often estrogen-dependent and although several mutations have been identified, it typically involves normal C1-INH activity. Despite the differences in C1-INH functionality, all three types of HAE manifest with similar clinical symptoms. HAE leads to recurrent episodes of non-pruritic angioedema, which occurs in the absence of urticaria. Breakthroughs in understanding HAE pathophysiology have revolutionized treatment, leading to the development of highly targeted therapies for both acute management and long-term prevention. Meanwhile, cutting-edge advancements in omics technologies are unlocking new possibilities for biomarker discovery, paving the way for more precise diagnoses and personalized treatment strategies that could significantly enhance patient outcomes. This review will delve into the intricate pathophysiology, diverse clinical presentations, and diagnostic challenges of HAE while exploring emerging biomarkers and innovative approaches to therapeutic management and prevention strategies. Additionally, it will underscore the vital importance of screening family members of affected individuals, even when symptoms are not present.

Dermatofibroma (DF) or fibrous histiocytoma is one of the most frequent benign cutaneous soft-tissue lesions, characterized by a post-inflammatory tissue reaction associated with fibrosis of the dermis. Clinically DFs have a polymorphous clinical aspect from the solitary, firm, single nodules to multiple papules with a relatively smooth surface. However, multiple atypical clinicopathological variants of DFs have been reported and, therefore, clinical recognition may become challenging, leading to a more burdensome identification and sometimes to misdiagnosis. Dermoscopy is considered an important tool in DFs diagnosis, as it improves diagnostic accuracy for clinically amelanotic nodules. Although typical dermoscopic patterns are most frequently seen in clinical practice, there have also been some atypical variants described, mimicking some underlying recurrent and sometimes harmful skin afflictions. Usually, no treatment is required, although an appropriate work-up may be necessary in specific cases, such as in the presence of atypical variants or a history of recent changes. This narrative review’s aim is to summarize current evidence regarding clinical presentation, positive and differential diagnosis of atypical dermatofibromas and also to raise awareness about the importance of specific characteristics of atypical variants to better differentiate them from malignant conditions.