Background: Approximately 75% of breast cancer (BC) is associated with luminal differentiation expressing endocrine receptors (ER). For ER+ HER2− tumors, adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone treatment. Although relapse events steadily continue, the ET benefits translate to dramatically lengthen life expectancy with bearable side-effects. This review of ER+ HER2− female BC outlines suitable adjuvant treatment strategies to help guide clinical decision making around appropriate therapy. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Libraries, using ER+ HER−, ET BC keywords. Results: In low-risk patients: five years of ET is the standard option. While Tamoxifen remains the preferred selection for premenopausal women, AI is the choice for postmenopausal patients. In the high-risk category: ET plus/minus OFS with two years of Abemaciclib is recommended. Although extended ET for a total of ten years is an alternative, the optimal AI duration is undetermined; nevertheless an additional two to three years beyond the initial five years may be sufficient. In this postmenopausal group, bisphosphonate is endorsed. Conclusions: Classifying the risk category assists in deciding the treatment route and its optimal duration. Tailoring the breadth of ET hinges on a wide array of factors to be appraised for each individualized case, including weighing its benefits and harms.

Background/Objectives: This study describes the sequelae, side effects, and toxicities experienced by Canadian breast cancer survivors at a breast cancer survivorship clinic at a tertiary academic cancer centre and identifies potential risk factors which may be associated with increased side effect burden. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of adult patients treated at the Sunnybrook Breast Cancer Survivorship Clinic from 6 July 2022, to 30 September 2023 (n = 435). Results: Most patients (72.6%) reported at least one side effect impacting their quality of life, and a smaller majority (55.4%) reported two or more side effects. The most common symptoms experienced were anxiety (29.4%), chronic pain (23.9%), hot flashes (21.4%), and fear of recurrence (19.8%). Older age was strongly correlated with a lower likelihood of experiencing greater side effect burden (p < 0.01). Patients who underwent chemotherapy were significantly more likely to experience higher side effect burden than patients who did not. Current smokers were more likely than nonsmokers or past smokers to have a higher burden, for both physical (p < 0.01) and psychological side effects (p < 0.01). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that younger age was strongly associated with greater side effect burden, higher likelihood of psychological and physical symptoms, and greater likelihood of requiring close follow-up. Conclusions: The results highlight the need for survivorship resources tailored to survivors under the age of 55 and the importance of referring smokers to smoking cessation programs. Additional research is required to explore the significant reluctance among patients regarding discharge. Future studies should examine the acute needs of younger breast cancer survivors and investigate the impact of smoking and treatment modalities on the side effect burden.

Pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes are associated with poor clinical outcomes but also offer an opportunity for more individualized therapeutic pathways. Given increasing knowledge, improvements in germline genetic testing efficiency, and the availability of novel systemic targeted treatment options, the importance of appropriately identifying patients for genetic testing has never been greater. A pan-Canadian expert working group (EWG) consisting of 10 healthcare professionals was convened to review recent international guidelines for germline genetic testing in breast cancer and develop Canadian recommendations. The group identified four clinical questions to address which patients should undergo testing, what approaches should be used, how patients should be counselled, and what steps are needed for implementation. In response to these questions, the EWG agreed upon 12 recommendations that emphasized broader incorporation of germline genetic testing and more standardized, streamlined testing and counselling approaches. The group also offered multiple suggestions to support effective and equitable implementation across Canada. These recommendations provide guidance for healthcare professionals and represent a call to action for the Canadian government and other organizations to support genetic testing pathways, drug access, and ultimately improved outcomes for patients with breast cancer and their families.

Pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes are associated with poor clinical outcomes but also offer an opportunity for more individualized therapeutic pathways. Given increasing knowledge, improvements in germline genetic testing efficiency, and the availability of novel systemic targeted treatment options, the importance of appropriately identifying patients for testing has never been greater. A pan-Canadian expert working group (EWG) consisting of 10 healthcare professionals (HCPs) was convened to review recent international guidelines for germline genetic testing in breast cancer and develop Canadian recommendations. The group identified four clinical questions to address which patients should undergo testing, what approaches should be used, how patients should be counselled, and what steps are needed for implementation. In response to these questions, the EWG agreed upon 12 recommendations that emphasized broader incorporation of germline genetic testing and more standardized, streamlined testing and counselling approaches. The group also offered multiple suggestions to support effective and equitable implementation across Canada. These recommendations provide guidance for HCPs and represent a call to action for the Canadian government and other organizations to support genetic testing pathways, drug access, and ultimately improved outcomes for patients with breast cancer and their families.

Background: In metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, osimertinib is the cornerstone treatment able to prolong overall survival (OS). Evidence around osimertinib being effective in leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is scarce. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic NSCLC-EGFR mutation treated with osimertinib at Sunnybrook Hospital. Results: We identified a total of 56 patients. Of these, 45 (79.4%) were never smokers, 53 (94.6%) had adenocarcinoma histology, and 26 (46.42%) had either the EGFR exon 21-L858R mutation or exon 19 deletion. The estimated median OS was 51 months (43.5–58.5). All eight patients with LM died during the study period. From the time of NSCLC diagnosis, the OS of patients without LM was 53 months (95% CI 47.2–58.7), and with LM was 21 months (95% CI 3.0–39), p = 0.001. However, the median OS from LM diagnosis was 2 months (95% CI, 1.0–26). Conclusions: In our population of patients with metastatic NSCLC-EGFR mutation who received osimertinib, there was a significant reduction in life expectancy in the group with LM. Patients who had advanced stage at diagnosis and were more likely to develop LM exhibited poorer survival compared to those who had early-stage cancer at diagnosis and developed metastases later on.