Background: The overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) accounts for 15–20% of all breast cancer phenotypes. Even after the completion of the standard combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab, relapse events occur in approximately 15% of cases. The neoadjuvant approach has multiple benefits that include the potential to downgrade staging and convert previously unresectable tumors to operable tumors. In addition, achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) following preoperative systemic treatment is prognostic of enhanced survival outcomes. Thus, optimal evaluation among the suitable strategies is crucial in deciding which patients should be selected for the neoadjuvant approach. Methods: A literature search was conducted in the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane electronic libraries. Conclusion: The evaluation of tumor and LN staging and, hence, stratifying BC recurrence risk are decisive factors in guiding clinicians to optimize treatment decisions between the neoadjuvant versus adjuvant approaches. For each individual case, it is important to consider the most likely postsurgical outcome, since, if the patient does not obtain pCR following neoadjuvant treatment, they are eligible for adjuvant T-DM1 in the case of residual disease. This review of HER2-positive female BC outlines suitable neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic treatment strategies for guiding clinical decision making around the selection of an appropriate therapy.

Background: In metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, osimertinib is the cornerstone treatment able to prolong overall survival (OS). Evidence around osimertinib being effective in leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is scarce. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic NSCLC-EGFR mutation treated with osimertinib at Sunnybrook Hospital. Results: We identified a total of 56 patients. Of these, 45 (79.4%) were never smokers, 53 (94.6%) had adenocarcinoma histology, and 26 (46.42%) had either the EGFR exon 21-L858R mutation or exon 19 deletion. The estimated median OS was 51 months (43.5–58.5). All eight patients with LM died during the study period. From the time of NSCLC diagnosis, the OS of patients without LM was 53 months (95% CI 47.2–58.7), and with LM was 21 months (95% CI 3.0–39), p = 0.001. However, the median OS from LM diagnosis was 2 months (95% CI, 1.0–26). Conclusions: In our population of patients with metastatic NSCLC-EGFR mutation who received osimertinib, there was a significant reduction in life expectancy in the group with LM. Patients who had advanced stage at diagnosis and were more likely to develop LM exhibited poorer survival compared to those who had early-stage cancer at diagnosis and developed metastases later on.