Monoclonal antibodies are laboratory-made proteins that mimic the immune system’s ability to fight off harmful microorganisms, including viruses such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medical Agency (EMA) have already authorized monoclonal antibodies of anti-SARS-CoV-2 to treat mild to moderate CoronaVIrus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) in patients at risk of developing severe disease. More recently, monoclonal antibodies anti-SARS-CoV-2 have been authorized for primary and secondary prophylaxis in patients at high risk of severe disease for background comorbidity. Primary or pre-exposure prophylaxis prevents COVID-19 in unexposed people, whereas secondary or postexposure prophylaxis prevent COVID-19 in recently exposed people to individuals with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2. This review focuses briefly on therapeutic indications of currently available monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 pre- and postexposure prophylaxis and on the efficacy of convalescent plasma.

This study characterizes antibody and T-cell immune responses over time until the booster dose of COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) undergoing different disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). We prospectively enrolled 134 PwMS and 99 health care workers (HCWs) having completed the two-dose schedule of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine within the last 2–4 weeks (T0) and followed them 24 weeks after the first dose (T1) and 4–6 weeks after the booster (T2). PwMS presented a significant reduction in the seroconversion rate and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD)-Immunoglobulin (IgG) titers from T0 to T1 (p < 0.0001) and a significant increase from T1 to T2 (p < 0.0001). The booster dose in PwMS showed a good improvement in the serologic response, even greater than HCWs, as it promoted a significant five-fold increase of anti-RBD-IgG titers compared with T0 (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the T-cell response showed a significant 1.5- and 3.8-fold increase in PwMS at T2 compared with T0 (p = 0.013) and T1 (p < 0.0001), respectively, without significant modulation in the number of responders. Regardless of the time elapsed since vaccination, most ocrelizumab- (77.3%) and fingolimod-treated patients (93.3%) showed only a T-cell-specific or humoral-specific response, respectively. The booster dose reinforces humoral- and cell-mediated-specific immune responses and highlights specific DMT-induced immune frailties, suggesting the need for specifically tailored strategies for immune-compromised patients to provide primary prophylaxis, early SARS-CoV-2 detection and the timely management of COVID-19 antiviral treatments.

Chagas disease (CD) is a parasitic infection endemic in Latin America and also affects patients in Western countries due to migration flows. This has a significant impact on health services worldwide due to its high morbidity and mortality burden. This paper aims to share our experience at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Lazzaro Spallanzani”, IRCCS, in Rome, Italy, where to date, a total of 47 patients—mainly Bolivian women—diagnosed with CD have received treatment with benznidazole, with all but one presenting with chronic disease. Most of the patients were recruited through the first extensive screening program held in 2014 at our Institute. About a quarter of our patients showed adverse effects to benznidazole, including a case of severe drug-induced liver injury, but 83% completed a full course of treatment. In addition to the description of our cohort, the paper reports a brief overview of the disease compiled through a review of the existing literature on CD in non-endemic countries. The growing prevalence of CD in Western countries highlights the importance of screening at-risk populations and urges public concern and medical awareness about this neglected tropical disease. There are still many unanswered questions that need to be addressed to develop a personalized approach in treating patients.

Aero-medical evacuation has been considered as a feasible and safe treatment option during COVID pandemic, particularly when the needs of affected patients exceed what local clinics and hospitals are supposed to provide. In this article, we analyzed the clinical course of 17 patients medically evacuated to the “L. Spallanzani” Institute in Rome, Italy from foreign countries, mainly Africa and Eastern Europe, who had COVID-19 pneumonia with, or without, coinfections such as malaria, HIV, tuberculosis and microbiologically confirmed sepsis syndrome. The aero-medical evacuation of patients with infectious diseases has become one of the greatest medical achievements we have reached during this pandemic; in fact, only two patients with life threatening coinfections have died. Although logistically difficult and cost consuming, medical evacuation should be considered as a treatment option more than a single extraordinary measure, especially among complex cases that require specific technical and human resources.

Background: Meningoencephalitis is a complex inflammatory condition of the CNS that can result in significant morbidity and mortality in critically ill adults. Accurate and timely neuromonitoring is essential for guiding management and improving outcomes. This study aimed to descriptively evaluate the prognostic value of early TCCD monitoring, particularly the pulsatility index, and its integration with conventional and perfusion MRI in patients with meningoencephalitis. Methods: We present an observational, retrospective, cohort study involving ten adult patients (median age 56 years, IQR 45.5–68.5; mean 55.9, range 35–76) with neurological syndromes caused by suspected or confirmed infectious meningoencephalitis. Etiologies included bacterial meningitis/meningoencephalitis (50%), viral meningoencephalitis (10%), neurotoxoplasmosis (10%), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (10%), and undetermined origin (20%). Patients underwent TCCD and MRI within 24 h. In five cases, standard MRI sequences were acquired, while in the remaining five, perfusion imaging was performed using Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL). A favorable outcome was defined as survival with neurological recovery (Glasgow Outcome Scale > 5) at ICU discharge. Results: TCCD-derived PI provided valuable information on cerebral hemodynamics. PI values ≤ 1.25 were associated with favorable clinical outcomes and symmetrical MRI findings. Conversely, PI > 1.25 correlated with poor prognosis and often preceded MRI-detectable structural damage. When combined with ASL, PI mirrored the detected perfusion asymmetries and was associated with poor prognosis in fatal cases. Conclusions: Bedside TCCD can offer real-time assessment of cerebrovascular dynamics and, when integrated with conventional and ASL MRI, could enhance the understanding of pathophysiological processes in meningoencephalitis, supporting timely and informed decisions in neurocritical care.

Immunocompromised (IC) patients continue to be at risk of severe COVID-19 despite vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapies. The comparative effectiveness of antiviral agents (AVAs) and monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) as early treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in IC patients is described in this work. This retrospective multicenter cohort study included IC outpatients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 between March 2021 and March 2022 at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Lazzaro Spallanzani” and Santa Maria Goretti University Hospital, Italy. Patients received either AVAs or MoAbs based on national guidelines. The primary outcome was time to negative nasopharyngeal swab (NPS). The secondary outcomes were COVID-19-related hospitalization or death by day 30. Among 1472 IC patients (with a median age of 58 years, 45% male), 688 (46%) were treated with MoAbs, and 783 (54%) were treated with AVAs. The patients treated with MoAbs had a higher duration to negative NPS (17 vs. 11 days, p < 0.05) and a higher risk of sustained SARS-CoV-2 positivity on day 7 (OR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.72–5.23, p < 0.01) and day 30 (OR: 6.0, 95% CI: 3.7–10.5, p < 0.01) than those treated with AVAs. There were no differences in hospitalization or mortality. AVAs were associated with a more rapid viral clearance than MoAbs, suggesting a potential advantage for reducing infectious duration in IC patients. Additional studies are necessary to further optimize the early treatment of COVID-19 in this high-risk population.