Since only uni-direction motion is produced by traditional abrasive flow machining (AFM), so the polishing effects of the inner hole is not easy to achieve uniform roughness of the whole surface after polishing. Therefore, in this study, a rotating device with a DC servo motor was set up in the AFM to increase the tangential forces on the machining surface, and therefore, improve the uniform surface roughness and polishing efficiency. The rotating device was designed by a group of transmission gear set and a DC servo motor to create a rotational finishing path for the abrasive medium. The rotational motion of an abrasive can create different tangential forces on the working surface, inducing a more complex polishing path than that of traditional AFM. In addition to rotational speed, a servo motor can also change rotation directions in one working process, causing an abrasive medium to create many irregular finishing paths in the AFM. The experimental results showed that the surface roughness of the workpiece was significantly decreased with an increase in the rotational speed. Additionally, the results also showed that the surface roughness (SR) of the inner hole decreased from 0.61 μm Ra to 0.082 μm Ra after 20 machining cycles, the surface roughness improvement rate reached 87% at 15 rpm rotational speed, by applying a 1.5:1 silicone gel/abrasive concentration ratio and #60 abrasive mesh in the experiments. This study created excellent polishing efficiency by using a servo rotational device with AFM to produce good surface quality.

Magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) is a fast, high efficiency and high-precision polishing method on the surface machining of the metals. Furthermore, MAF also can be utilized to polish the stainless tubes in industrial applications; however, stainless tubes are often a non-magnetic material that makes it difficult for the magnetic field line to penetrate into the stainless tubes, thus reducing the magnetic forces in the inner tubes polishing. That is why stainless tubes are not easy to finish using traditional MAF. Therefore, magnetic finishing with gel abrasive (MFGA) applies gels mixed with steel grit and abrasives that were developed to improve the polishing efficiency and surface uniformity of the steel elements. In this study, a guar gum or silicone gel mixed with steel grit and silicon carbides are used as the magnetic abrasive gel to polish the stainless inner tubes. A DC motor was used to control the rotation speed of the chuck and an AC induction motor connected with an eccentric cam to produce the reciprocating motion of the workpiece were utilized to finish the inner surface of stainless tubes in the polishing process. The parameters of abrasive concentration, abrasive particle sizes, rotation speeds of motor and electric currents were used to investigate the surface roughness and the removal of materials from the stainless tubes. The experimental results showed that since guar gum had better fluidity than the silicone gel did, guar gum created excellent polishing efficiency in MFGA. Furthermore, the surface roughness of the stainless tube decreased from 0.646 μm Ra to below 0.056 μm Ra after processing for 30 min with the parameters of current 3A, gel abrasive with guar gum, rotational speed 1300 rpm and vibration frequency 4 Hz.

The micro lens array (MLA) has played an important role in optical systems for the past few years, and the precision of pressing dies has dominated the quality of MLAs in glass molding. Few studies have covered the transcription effects on surface roughness of pressing dies for this technology. Therefore, this research utilized pressing dies to produce a sine-wave lens array on glass molding, to transform the Gauss-distributed spotlight into a uniform straight one and then characterize the transcription effects of these lenses. Pressing dies with a sine-wave shape were firstly cut by wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM), and then ultrasonic polishing using diamond abrasives was applied to finish the sine-wave surface with an original roughness of 0.2 μm Ra. Next, the sine-wave lens arrays were pressed by glass molding at the appropriate pressure and temperature, before evaluating the transcription effects of transforming the Gauss-distributed spotlight into a uniform straight one. The result showed that the sine-wave lens array stuck easily to the pressing die and then ruptured during glass molding due to the poor surface roughness of pressing tool. However, the diamond abrasive with appropriate sizes could establish good surface roughness on pressing dies via ultrasonic polishing, and the pressing die with a low surface roughness of 0.08 μm Ra was able to successfully perform MLA in the glass molding. However, only pressing dies with a surface roughness smaller than 0.023 μm Ra could produce precision glass lenses to transform the Gauss-distributed spotlight into a uniform straight one.

3D printing technology can easily and quickly produce small batch models and full-size parts, which has obvious and important benefits in shortening development time. Since metals exhibit excellent mechanical strength and high wear resistance, metal additive manufacturing (MAM) is a popular technology for making metal parts. However, metal powders and 3D-printing machines are costly, which increases the difficulty of achieving mass production through MAM. In this study, the 3D wax printing and investment casting (WPIC) approach was developed to manufacture high-quality metal optical lenses with high efficiency and low cost. The manufactured lenses had a diameter of 38.1 mm, two radii of curvature (15 and 90 mm), and a cooling channel. These lenses were manufactured through 3D printing by using wax patterns produced through investment casting. The manufacturing efficiency and machining accuracy of the lenses produced using the proposed method were compared with those of lenses produced through MAM and investment casting. The results indicated that the total costs of manufacturing an optical lens through MAM and investment casting were nine and eight times greater, respectively than that of manufacturing an optical lens through WPIC. In addition, the surface roughness of metal lenses manufactured through WPIC was 45% lower than that of lenses manufactured through MAM. Finally, the time required to manufacture 50 metal lenses was only 15 days when WPIC was used; the corresponding time was 25 days and 6 months when MAM and investment casting were used, respectively. According to the above-mentioned results, the WPIC process has excellent advantages in product manufacturing cost and developing schedule over MAM and traditional methods of investment casting.