Algorithms for locomotion mode recognition (LMR) based on surface electromyography and mechanical sensors have recently been developed and could be used for the neural control of powered prosthetic legs. However, the variations in input signals, caused by physical changes at the sensor interface and human physiological changes, may threaten the reliability of these algorithms. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of applying adaptive pattern classifiers for LMR. Three adaptive classifiers, i.e., entropy-based adaptation (EBA), LearnIng From Testing data (LIFT), and Transductive Support Vector Machine (TSVM), were compared and offline evaluated using data collected from two able-bodied subjects and one transfemoral amputee. The offline analysis indicated that the adaptive classifier could effectively maintain or restore the performance of the LMR algorithm when gradual signal variations occurred. EBA and LIFT were recommended because of their better performance and higher computational efficiency. Finally, the EBA was implemented for real-time human-in-the-loop prosthesis control. The online evaluation showed that the applied EBA effectively adapted to changes in input signals across sessions and yielded more reliable prosthesis control over time, compared with the LMR without adaptation. The developed novel adaptive strategy may further enhance the reliability of neurally-controlled prosthetic legs.

The tuning of robotic prosthesis control is essential to provide personalized assistance to individual prosthesis users. Emerging automatic tuning algorithms have shown promise to ease the device personalization procedure. However, very few automatic tuning algorithms consider the user preference as the tuning goal, which may limit the adoptability of the robotic prosthesis. In this study, we propose and evaluate a novel prosthesis control tuning framework for a robotic knee prosthesis, which could enable user preferred robot behavior in the device tuning process. The framework consists of 1) a User-Controlled Interface that allows the user to select their preferred knee kinematics in gait and 2) a reinforcement learning-based algorithm for tuning high-dimension prosthesis control parameters to meet the desired knee kinematics. We evaluated the performance of the framework along with usability of the developed user interface. In addition, we used the developed framework to investigate whether amputee users can exhibit a preference between different profiles during walking and whether they can differentiate between their preferred profile and other profiles when blinded. The results showed effectiveness of our developed framework in tuning 12 robotic knee prosthesis control parameters while meeting the user-selected knee kinematics. A blinded comparative study showed that users can accurately and consistently identify their preferred prosthetic control knee profile. Further, we preliminarily examined gait biomechanics of the prosthesis users when walking with different prosthesis control and did not find clear difference between walking with preferred prosthesis control and when walking with normative gait control parameters. This study may inform future translation of this novel prosthesis tuning framework for home or clinical use.

Using wearable robotics to modulate step width in normal walking for enhanced mediolateral balance has not been demonstrated in the field. We designed a bilateral hip exoskeleton with admittance control to power hip abduction and adduction to modulate step width. Objective: As the first step to show its potential, the objective of this study was to investigate how human's step width reacted to hip exoskeleton's admittance control parameter changes during walking. Methods: Ten non-disabled individuals walked on a treadmill at a self-selected speed, while wearing our bilateral robotic hip exoskeleton. We used two equilibrium positions to define the direction of assistance. We studied the influence of multiple stiffness values in the admittance control on the participants’ step width, step length, and electromyographic (EMG) activity of the gluteus medius. Results: Step width were significantly modulated by the change of stiffness in exoskeleton control, while step length did not show significant changes. When the stiffness changed from zero to our studied stiffness values, the participants’ step width started to modulate immediately. Within 4 consecutive heel strikes right after a stiffness change, the step width showed a significant change. Interestingly, EMG activity of the gluteus medius did not change significantly regardless the applied stiffness and powered direction. Conclusion: Tuning of stiffness in admittance control of a hip exoskeleton, acting in mediolateral direction, can be a viable way for controlling step width in normal walking. Unvaried gluteus medius activity indicates that the increase in step width were mainly caused by the assistive torque applied by the exoskeleton. Significance: Our study results pave a new way for future design and control of wearable robotics in enhancing mediolateral walking balance for various rehabilitation applications.

Although advanced wearable robots can assist human wearers, their internal faults (i.e., sensors or control errors) also pose a challenge. To ensure safe wearer-robot interactions, how internal errors by the prosthesis limb affect the stability of the user-prosthesis system, and how users react and compensate for the instability elicited by internal errors are imperative. The goals of this study were to 1) systematically investigate the biomechanics of a wearer-robot system reacting to internal errors induced by a powered knee prosthesis (PKP), and 2) quantify the error tolerable bound that does not affect the user’s gait stability. Eight non-disabled participants and two unilateral transfemoral amputees walked on a pathway wearing a PKP, as the controller randomly switched the control parameters to disturbance parameters to mimic the errors caused by locomotion mode misrecognition. The size of prosthesis control errors was systematically varied to determine the error tolerable bound that disrupted gait stability. The effect of the error was quantified based on the 1) mechanical change described by the angular impulse applied by the PKP, and 2) overall gait instability quantified using human perception, angular momentum, and compensatory stepping. The results showed that the error tolerable bound is dependent on the gait phase and the direction of torque change. Two balance recovery strategies were also observed to allow participants to successful respond to the induced errors. The outcomes of this study may assist the future design of an auto-tuning algorithm, volitionally-controlled powered prosthetic legs, and training of gait stability.

The capability to monitor gait stability during everyday life could provide key information to guide clinical intervention to patients with lower limb disabilities. Whole body angular momentum (L_body) is a convenient stability indicator for wearable motion capture systems. However, L_body is costly to estimate, because it requires monitoring all major body segment using expensive sensor elements. In this study, we developed a simplified rigid body model by merging connected body segments to reduce the number of body segments, which need to be monitored. We demonstrated that the L_body could be estimated by a seven-segment model accurately for both people with and without lower extremity amputation.