Donald C. Weber

Dr. Donald C. Weber

USDA Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Insect Biocontrol & Behavior Laboratory, Bldg. 007 Room 324, BARC-West Beltsville, MD 20705, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2014 in Journal of Economic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Donald C. WeberDonald C. Weber
Donald C. Weber
TLTracy C. Leskey
Tracy C. Leskey
GWGuillermo Cabrera Walsh
Guillermo Cabrera Walsh
AKAshot Khrimian
Ashot Khrimian
The reported male-produced aggregation pheromone of the brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), identified as

16 March 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMegan V. Herlihy
Megan V. Herlihy
Elijah TalamasElijah Talamas
Elijah Talamas
Donald C. WeberDonald C. Weber
Donald C. Weber
Egg parasitoids of the exotic invasive brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål), were investigated using lab-reared fresh (live) and frozen (killed) lab-reared sentinel egg masses deployed for 72h on foliage in three habitats—woods, orchard, and soybean field—in Maryland, USA, in summer 2014. Four native hymenopteran species, Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Scelionidae), Trissolcus euschisti (Ashmead) and Tr. brochymenae Ashmead (Scelionidae), and Anastatus reduvii (Howard) (Eupelmidae), developed and emerged from H. halys eggs. One exotic parasitoid, Trissolcus japonicus (Ashmead), emerged, providing the first known occurrence of this species in North America. Native parasitoids emerged from frozen eggs significantly more often than from fresh eggs (89.3% of egg masses and 98.1% of individual eggs), whereas the exotic Tr. japonicus did not show a similar difference, strongly suggesting adaptation to H. halys as a host by Tr. japonicus but not by the native species. Parasitoids were habitat-specific: all three Trissolcus species were significantly more likely to occur in the woods habitat, whereas Te. podisi was found exclusively in the soybean field. Further investigations are required to elucidate evolving host-parasitoid relationships, habitat specificity, and non-target effects of Tr. japonicus over the expanded range of H. halys in North America.

15 May 2017 in Journal of Pest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Donald C. WeberDonald C. Weber
Donald C. Weber
William MorrisonWilliam Morrison
William Morrison
AKAshot Khrimian
Ashot Khrimian
KRKevin B. Rice
Kevin B. Rice
TLTracy C. Leskey
Tracy C. Leskey
BBBrett R. Blaauw
Brett R. Blaauw

1 June 2009 in Journal of Insect Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Donald C. WeberDonald C. Weber
Donald C. Weber
JLJonathan G. Lundgren
Jonathan G. Lundgren
Using quantitative PCR that amplified a prey-specific mtDNA 214 bp amplicon from the COI mitochondrial gene of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotar

13 September 2024 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KWKris Wyckhuys
Kris Wyckhuys
BGBaogen Gu
Baogen Gu
IFIbtissem Ben Fekih
Ibtissem Ben Fekih
RFRobert Finger
Robert Finger
MKMark Kenis
Mark Kenis
BHBuyung A.R. Hadi
Buyung A.R. Hadi
Human society is anchored in the global agroecosystem. For millennia, this system has provided humans with copious supplies of nutrient-rich food. Yet, through chemical intensification and simplification, vast shares of present-day farmland derive insufficient benefits from biodiversity and prove highly vulnerable to biotic stressors. Here, we argue that on-farm action centered on biological control can effectively defuse pest risk by bolstering foundational ecosystem services. By harnessing plant, animal and microbial biodiversity, biological control offers safe, efficacious and economically-sound plant health solutions and coevolved options for invasive species mitigation. In recent years, its scientific foundation has been fortified and solutions have been refined for myriad ecologically brittle systems. Yet, for biological control to be mainstreamed, it needs to be rebooted, intertwined with (on- and off-farm) agroecological tactics and refurbished - from research, policy and regulation, public-private partnerships up to modes of implementation. Misaligned incentives (for chemical pesticides) and adoption barriers further need to be removed, while its scientific underpinnings should become more interdisciplinary, policy-relevant, solution-oriented and linked with market demand. Thus, biological control could ensure human wellbeing in a nature-friendly manner and retain farmland ecological functioning under global change.

8 July 2020 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Guillermo Cabrera WalshGuillermo Cabrera Walsh
Guillermo Cabrera Walsh
CÁCrébio J. Ávila
Crébio J. Ávila
NCNora Cabrera
Nora Cabrera
Dori Edson NavaDori Edson Nava
Dori Edson Nava
Alexandre PintoAlexandre Pinto
Alexandre Pinto
Donald C. WeberDonald C. Weber
Donald C. Weber
The genus Diabrotica has over 400 described species, the majority of them neotropical. However, only three species of neotropical Diabrotica are considered agricultural pests: D. speciosa, D. balteata, and D. viridula. D. speciosa and D. balteata are polyphagous both as adults and during the larval stage. D. viridula are stenophagous during the larval stage, feeding essentially on maize roots, and polyphagous as adults. The larvae of the three species are pests on maize, but D. speciosa larvae also feed on potatoes and peanuts, while D. balteata larvae feed on beans and peanuts. None of these species express a winter/dry season egg diapause, displaying instead several continuous, latitude-mediated generations per year. This hinders the use of crop rotation as a management tool, although early planting can help in the temperate regions of the distribution of D. speciosa. The parasitoids of adults, Celatoria bosqi and Centistes gasseni, do not exert much control on Diabrotica populations, or show potential for inundative biocontrol plans. Management options are limited to insecticide applications and Bt genetically modified (GM) maize. Other techniques that show promise are products using Beauveria bassiana and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, semiochemical attractants for monitoring purposes or as toxic baits, and plant resistance.