genyi wan

Mr. genyi wan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 September 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GWgenyi wan
genyi wan
YWYong Wang
Yong Wang
TWTao Wang
Tao Wang
NZNingning Zhu
Ningning Zhu
RZRuizhuo Zhang
Ruizhuo Zhang
RZRuofei Zhong
Ruofei Zhong
The registration of panoramic images and mobile light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data is quite challenging because different imaging mechanisms and viewing angle differences generate significant geometric and radiation distortions between the two multimodal data sources. To address this problem, we propose a registration method for panoramic images and mobile LiDAR data based on the hybrid geometric structure index feature of phase. We use the initial GPS/IMU to transform the mobile LiDAR data into an intensity map and align the two images to complete registration. Firstly, a novel feature descriptor called a hybrid geometric structure index of phase (HGIFP) is built to capture the structural information of the images. Then, a set of corresponding feature points is obtained from the two images using the constructed feature descriptor combined with a robust false-match elimination algorithm. The average pixel distance of the corresponding feature points is used as the error function. Finally, in order to complete the accurate registration of the mobile LiDAR data and panoramic images and improve computational efficiency, we propose the assumption of local motion invariance of 3D–2D corresponding feature points and minimize the error function through multiple reprojections to achieve the best registration parameters. The experimental results show that the method in this paper can complete the registration of panoramic images and the mobile LiDAR data under a rotation error within 12° and a translation error within 2 m. After registration, the average error of rotation is about 0.15°, and the average error of translation is about 1.27 cm. Moreover, it achieves a registration accuracy of less than 3 pixels in all cases, which outperforms the current five state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating its superior registration performance.

25 November 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GWgenyi wan
genyi wan
RZRuofei Zhong
Ruofei Zhong
CWChaohong Wu
Chaohong Wu
YXYusheng Xu
Yusheng Xu
ZYZhen Ye
Zhen Ye
KYKe Yu
Ke Yu
Multimodal images refer to images obtained by different sensors, and there are serious nonlinear radiation differences (NRDs) between multimodal images for photos of the same object. Traditional multimodal image matching methods cannot achieve satisfactory results in most cases. In order to better solve the NRD in multimodal image matching, as well as the rotation and scale problems, we propose a two-step matching method based on co-occurrence scale space combined with the second-order Gaussian steerable filter (G-CoFTM). We first use the second-order Gaussian steerable filter and co-occurrence filter to construct the image’s scale space to preserve the image’s edge and detail features. Secondly, we use the second-order gradient direction to calculate the images’ principal direction, and describe the images’ feature points through improved GLOH descriptors. Finally, after obtaining the rough matching results, the optimized 3DPC descriptors are used for template matching to complete the fine matching of the images. We validate our proposed G-CoFTM method on eight different types of multimodal datasets and compare it with five state-of-the-art methods: PSO-SIFT, CoFSM, RIFT, HAPCG, and LPSO. Experimental results show that our proposed method has obvious advantages in matching success rate (SR) and the number of correct matches (NCM). On eight different types of datasets, compared with CoFSM, RIFT, HAPCG, and LPSO, the mean SRs of G-CoFSM are 17.5%, 6.187%, 30.462%, and 32.21%, respectively, and the mean NCMs are 5.322, 11.503, 8.607, and 16.429 times those of the above four methods.