Nikolaos Pandis

Nikolaos Pandis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 August 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSofia Daniolou
Sofia Daniolou
NPNikolaos Pandis
Nikolaos Pandis
HZHans Jörg Znoj
Hans Jörg Znoj
The superiority of early interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) has recently been questioned. This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of early interventions in improving the cognitive ability, language, and adaptive behavior of pre-school children with ASDs through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In total, 33 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis using the random effects model. The total sample consisted of 2581 children (age range: 12–132 months). Early interventions led to positive outcomes for cognitive ability (g = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.58; p = 0.02), daily living skills (g = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.63; p = 0.01), and motor skills (g = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.62; p = 0.001), while no positive outcomes were found for the remaining variables. However, when studies without the blinding of outcome assessment were excluded, positive outcomes of early interventions only remained for daily living skills (g = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.52; p = 0.02) and motor skills (g = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.69; p = 0.007). Although early intervention might not have positive impacts on children with ASDs for several outcomes compared to controls, these results should be interpreted with caution considering the great variability in participant and intervention characteristics.

12 June 2026 in Archives of Oral Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NANikolaos Angelakopoulos
Nikolaos Angelakopoulos
RBRizky Merdietio Boedi
Rizky Merdietio Boedi
AFAdemir Franco
Ademir Franco
Nikolaos GkantidisNikolaos Gkantidis
Nikolaos Gkantidis
SLStefano De Luca
Stefano De Luca
NPNikolaos Pandis
Nikolaos Pandis
Third molars (M3s) are the teeth most frequently affected by agenesis in modern human permanent dentition. Despite extensive research, reported prevalence rates vary considerably across populations and study designs. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated global estimate of the prevalence and patterns of M3 agenesis by incorporating evidence published since the previous comprehensive review by Carter and Worthington (2016). A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Virtual Health Library, SciElo, and Open Access Theses and Dissertations to identify relevant studies reporting radiographically diagnosed M3 agenesis in individuals aged ≥ 11 years. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled prevalence and to examine differences according to sex and jaw. A total of 125 data points comprising 87,282 individuals were included. The pooled global prevalence of M3 agenesis was 23.07% (95% CI: 21.2-25.0%), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I² =97.6%). No significant difference was observed between prevalence estimates from the earlier dataset and newly included studies (2015-2025). Sex stratified analysis indicated slightly lower odds of agenesis in males compared to females (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99). Jaw-specific analysis revealed higher odds of agenesis in the maxilla than in the mandible (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.12-2.18). These outcomes confirm that agenesis of at least one M3 affects approximately one quarter of the global population - a finding that can be relevant and should be considered by professionals in clinical, forensic, and academic contexts.