Preliminary studies have reported that motor control is negatively impacted following an infection of COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on maintaining balance in highly skilled athletes. As part of a larger investigation that was initiated in 2019, twelve professional handball players were recruited to participate in a study that was designed to measure static balance performance. Following the initial pre-test, six participants (body height 184.8 ± 4.7 cm; body weight 85.5 ± 3.3 kg; age 21.3 ± 1.2 years) were infected with COVID-19. The remaining six participants (body height 188.7 ± 2.6 cm; body weight 92.3 ± 3.7 kg; age 26.3 ± 3.3 years) never tested positive for COVID-19 and were presumably not infected with the virus. The experimental design required all the participants to complete an initial balance assessment (pre-test) and a later balance assessment (post-test). To fully analyze our data, we conducted a 2 (condition: COVID, no-COVID) X 2 (test: pre-test, post-test) ANOVA with repeated measures on the second factor. Our analysis revealed that the skilled athletes who contracted COVID-19 had a significant decrease in balance performance from the pre-test that occurred prior to being infected with COVID-19 relative to the post-test that occurred following the COVID-19 infection. Additionally, the skilled athletes who were not infected with COVID-19 did not demonstrate the same deterioration in balance performance in the same period. This study highlights the impact COVID-19 has on static balance performance in a group of highly skilled handball players. Longitudinal studies are needed to fully understand the lasting impacts COVID-19 has on motor behavior.

Background We investigated to determine the effectiveness of verbal feedback in learning the round-off back somersault on the balance beam with stable landing. Methods: The research material consisted of female gymnasts (n = 16). They were randomly assigned to one of two groups: FKE group (n = 8) with feedback on key elements, or FAE group (n = 8) with 100% feedback on all errors made in the phase structure of the task. Results: Based on research, it was established that key elements could be identified in the preparatory, main and final phases. Mixed ANOVA showed that significant differences (p < 0.05) were noted due to the teaching method used (Group x Time factor) when performing the gymnastic routine of round-off back somersault with stable landing on the balance beam. Based on the Welch t test for independent data it was revealed that the group with feedback on the key elements obtained significantly higher mean scores from judges at the end of the experiment. Conclusions: The findings of the present study point to a possibility of offering coaches teaching methods that increase the effectiveness of learning complex motor skills and indicate a possibility of applying such solutions in groups of female gymnasts both in training and during competitions.

Background: This study aimed to examine the influence of three different instructions on preschoolers during simple motor task learning. Methods: Fifty-eight children were randomly assigned to one of three practice groups: kinesthetic instruction, verbal instruction, or visual demonstration. The participants performed a novel gymnastics task that involved five upper limb movements in a specific order. Participants were instructed (through kinesthetic, verbal, or visual instructions) to perform the indicated positions. All three groups followed the same experimental design and performed three 5-trial blocks during six practice sessions. The practice sessions occurred twice a week for three weeks. Regardless of the group, all participants completed a total of 90 trials. For each trial, a gymnastics judge assessed the performance.Results: The kinesthetic group score was significantly greater than the verbal group score but not significantly different compared to the visual group score in the post-test. The visual and verbal instructions were similarly effective in the retention test. Conclusion: One of the most important findings from the present study was that the most effective instructions for learning simple motor tasks in preschoolers were not verbal or visual instructions, unlike kinesthetic instructions. It was also proven that the verbal and visual instructions did not reveal differences. The findings provide relevant information to the child development literature and suggest that differences in learners need not result in differences in learning fundamental motor skills.