In-hospital complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), and ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be overestimated by analyses of administrative data. We determined the incidences of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and stroke around AF, AFL, and VT ablations in four German tertiary centres between 2005 and 2020. All cases were coded by the G-DRG- and OPS-systems. Uniform code search terms were applied defining both the types of ablations for AF, AFL, and VT and the occurrence of major adverse events including femoral vascular complications, iatrogenic tamponade, stroke, and in-hospital death. Importantly, all complications were individually reviewed based on patient-level source records. Overall, 43 031 ablations were analysed (30 361 AF; 9364 AFL; 3306 VT). The number of ablations/year more than doubled from 2005 (n = 1569) to 2020 (n = 3317) with 3 times and 2.5 times more AF and VT ablations in 2020 (n = 2404 and n = 301, respectively) as compared to 2005 (n = 817 and n = 120, respectively), but a rather stable number of AFL ablations (n = 554 vs. n = 612). Major peri-procedural complications occurred in 594 (1.4%) patients. Complication rates were 1.1% (n = 325) for AF, 1.0% (n = 95) for AFL, and 5.3% (n = 175) for VT. With an increase in complex AF/VT procedures, the overall complication rate significantly increased (0.76% in 2005 vs. 1.81% in 2020; P = 0.004); but remained low over time. Following patient-adjudication, all in-hospital cardiac tamponades (0.7%) and strokes (0.2%) were related to ablation. Major femoral vascular complications requiring surgical intervention occurred in 0.4% of all patients. The in-hospital mortality rate adjudicated to be ablation-related was lower than the coded mortality rate: AF: 0.03% vs. 0.04%; AFL: 0.04% vs. 0.14%; VT: 0.42% vs. 1.48%. Major adverse events are low and comparable after catheter ablation for AFL and AF (∼1.0%), whereas they are five times higher for VT ablations. In the presence of an increase in complex ablation procedures, a moderate but significant increase in overall complications from 2005–20 was observed. Individual case analysis demonstrated a lower than coded ablation-related in-hospital mortality. This highlights the importance of individual case adjudication when analysing administrative data.

The implantation of cardiac devices significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Arrhythmias as well as therapy delivered by the device may impact quality of life of patients concerned considerably. Therefore we aimed at conducting a systematic search and meta-analysis of trials examining the impact of the implantation of cardiac devices, namely implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), pacemakers and left-ventricular assist devices (LVAD) on quality of life. After pre-registering the trial with the PROSPERO database, we searched Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane databases for relevant publications. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers using standardized protocols. A total of 37 trials met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 31 trials were cohort trials while 6 trials used a randomized controlled design. We found large pre-post effect sizes for positive associations between quality of life and all types of devices. The effect sizes for LVAD, pacemaker and ICD patients were g = 1.64, g = 1.32 and g = 0.64, respectively. There was a lack of trials examining the effect of implantation on quality of life relative to control conditions. Trials assessing quality of life in patients with cardiac devices are still scarce. Yet, the existing data suggest beneficial effects of cardiac devices on quality of life. We recommend that clinical trials on cardiac devices routinely assess quality of life or other parameters of psychological well-being as a decisive study endpoint. Furthermore, improvements in psychological well-being should influence decisions about implantations of cardiac devices and be part of patient education and may impact shared decision-making.

Experimental studies and clinical reports suggest antiarrhythmic properties of mexiletine in different arrhythmias. We aimed at investigating mexiletine in experimental models of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as in long-QT- (LQTS) and short-QT-syndrome (SQTS). In 15 isolated rabbit hearts, erythromycin (300 µM) was infused for simulation of long-QT-2-syndrome. In further 13 hearts, veratridine was administered to simulate long-QT-3-syndrome. Both drugs induced a significant QT-prolongation (erythromycin: +87 ms, P < 0.01; veratridine: +19 ms, P < 0.05) and increased dispersion of repolarization (erythromycin: +55 ms, P < 0.01; veratridine +31 ms, P < 0.01). Additional infusion of mexiletine (25 µM) resulted in a significant reduction of dispersion (erythromycin: −43 ms, P < 0.01; veratridine: −26 ms, P < 0.05). Reproducible induction of torsade de pointes was observed in 13 of 15 erythromycin-treated hearts (192 episodes) and 6 of 13 veratridine-treated hearts (36 episodes). Additional infusion of mexiletine significantly reduced ventricular tachycardia (VT) incidence. With mexiletine, only 3 of 15 erythromycin-treated hearts (27 episodes) and 1 of 13 veratridine-treated hearts (2 episodes) presented polymorphic VT. In additional 9 hearts, the I_K-ATP-channel-opener pinacidil was employed to simulate SQTS and significantly abbreviated ventricular repolarization (QT-interval: −18 ms, P < 0.05) and enhanced induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Mexiletine reversed the effects of pinacidil, increase refractory period (+127 ms, P < 0.01) and significantly suppressed induction of VF. In further 13 hearts AF was induced by combined treatment with acetylcholine/isoproterenol. Mexiletine also increased atrial refractory period (+80 ms, P < 0.01) and thereby effectively suppressed atrial fibrillation. Acute infusion of mexiletine significantly reduced the occurrence of polymorphic VT in the presence of pharmacologically simulated LQTS. Furthermore, mexiletine demonstrated potent antiarrhythmic properties in a model of SQTS and in AF.

The incidence of in-hospital post-interventional complications and mortality after ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) vary among the type of procedure and most likely the experience of the centre. As ablation therapy of SVT is progressively being established as first-line therapy, further assessment of post-procedural complication rates is crucial for health care quality. We aimed at determining the incidence of in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications from SVT ablations in German high-volume electrophysiological centres between 2005 and 2020. All cases were registered by the German Diagnosis Related Groups—and the German Operation and Procedure Classification (OPS) system. A uniform search for SVT ablations from 2005 to 2020 with the same OPS codes defining the type of ablation/arrhythmia as well as the presence of a vascular complication, cardiac tamponade, and/or in-hospital death was performed. An overall of 47 610 ablations with 10 037 SVT ablations were registered from 2005 to 2020 among three high-volume centres. An overall complication rate of 0.5% (n = 38) was found [median age, 64; ±15 years; female n = 26 (68%)]. All-cause mortality was 0.02% (n = 2) and both patients had major prior co-morbidities precipitating a lethal outcome irrespective of the ablation procedure. Vascular complications occurred in 10 patients (0.1%), and cardiac tamponade was detected in 26 cases (0.3%). The present case-based analysis shows an overall low incidence of in-hospital complications after SVT ablation highlighting the overall very good safety profile of SVT ablations in high-volume centres. Further prospective analysis is still warranted to guarantee continuous quality control and optimal patient care.