(1) Background: Functional abdominal bloating and distension (FAB/FAD) are common disorders of the gut–brain interaction. Their physiopathology is complex and not completely clarified, although gut microbiota imbalances play a central role. The treatment of FAB/FAD still represents a clinical challenge for both patients and healthcare providers. Gut microbiota modulation strategies might play a crucial role in their management. The aim of this narrative review was to update the current evidence on FAB/FAD, with a focus on gut microbiota. (2) Methods: In October 2023, a review was conducted through the Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases. Selected literature included all available English-edited studies (randomized controlled trials and cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies). (3) Results: Twelve studies were selected, most of which investigated the relationship between IBS and microbiota, with bloating being one of its symptoms. The studies suggest that restoring a balanced microbiome appears to be the most promising solution for better management of FAB/FAD. Targeted approaches, such as the use of probiotics, prebiotics, antibiotics such as rifaximin or dietary modifications, may hold the key to alleviating symptoms. Other therapeutic options, such as diet, neuromodulators, and brain–gut behavioral therapies (i.e., cognitive-behavioral therapy) have shown promising outcomes, but strong data are still lacking. (4) Conclusions: Targeted approaches that focus on the gut microbiota, such as the use of probiotics, prebiotics, and antibiotics, are essential in managing FAB/FAD. Understanding the complex relationship between gut microbiota and FAB/FAD is crucial for developing effective treatments. Further studies are needed to explore the specific roles of different microbial populations in patients with FAB/FAD to enhance therapeutic strategies.

Background: The vaccination status of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) should be investigated before starting any treatment, and patients should eventually be vaccinated against vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). Patients with IBD may have suboptimal vaccination rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the vaccination coverage, attitude towards vaccinations, and determinants among an Italian cohort of patients with IBD. Methods: AMICI, the Italian IBD patients’ association, sent an anonymous web-based questionnaire in February 2021. Previous vaccination status and patients’ attitudes towards vaccinations were recorded. We examined the factors influencing their attitudes using crude and adjusted odds ratios (adjORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among the 4039 patients invited, 1252 patients (including 729 women, median age 47.7 [37–58]) completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 25.3%. Respondents declared being vaccinated against tetanus (74.1%), flu (67.7%; last season), MMR (43.3%), HBV (37.1%), pneumococcus (29.1%), meningitis (20%), HAV (16%), VZV (15.3%), and HPV (7.6%). Complete vaccination history was not remembered by 20.7% of the patients. One thousand one hundred and twelve (88.8%) expressed a positive attitude towards vaccination, 91 (7.3%) were indifferent, and 49 (3.9%) reported being opposed to vaccinations. The belief of a possible return of VPDs with a decline in vaccination coverage rates was the factor most strongly related to a positive attitude towards vaccinations (adjOR 5.67, 95% CI 3.45–9.30, p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: A low vaccination rate against some VPDs was found among a national cohort of patients with IBD, despite a generally positive attitude towards vaccinations.

(1) Background: The identification of vaccination status and attitudes towards vaccines among celiac disease (CD) patients is of great importance, but it has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate coverage against vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), attitudes towards vaccinations, and its determinants among CD patients. (2) Methods: An anonymous web-based validated questionnaire was sent to a mailing list of CD adult patients. Patients were asked to self-report their previous vaccinations and attitudes towards vaccinations, which were defined as positive, negative, and partially positive/negative. The influencing factors towards vaccinations were investigated, and crude and adjusted odds ratios (AdjORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. (3) Results: The questionnaire was sent to 412 patients, with a response rate of 31.6% (130 patients, 105 women, median age 40 years, interquartile range 36–51). Patients self-reported vaccination against the following diseases: 73.8% tetanus, 42.3% flu, 20% measles, mumps and rubella, 19.2% meningitis, and 16.2% pneumococcus. Thirty-two people (24.6%) did not remember all of their previous vaccinations. In total, 104 (80%) respondents had a positive attitude towards vaccines, 25 (19.2%) a partially positive/negative one, and 1 a negative one. The determinants significantly influencing the positive attitude were being a graduate (AdjORs 7.49) and a belief in the possible return of VPDs with declining vaccination coverage rates (AdjORs 7.42), while the use of complementary and alternative medicines (AdjORs 0.11) and past negative experience (AdjORs 0.16) were associated with a negative attitude. (4) Conclusions: Despite four out of five CD patients showing a strong positive attitude towards vaccinations, one out of five had a partially negative one. Only a minority (16–20%) reported being vaccinated against some VPDs potentially harmful to their CD because of hyposplenism, such as meningitis and pneumococcus. The low vaccination rate against some VPDs, in spite of the 80% of CD patients stating a positive attitude towards vaccination, may be explained in part by patients’ vaccine hesitancy and in part by a possible role of physicians in under-prescribing vaccinations to these patients. These results may be a starting point for developing specific vaccination campaigns to increase vaccination rates against VPDs in CD patients.

Esophageal fibrotic remodeling is a major complication of chronic inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and represents one of the main determinants of symptoms in adult patients with EoE, with a remarkable impact on patients’ quality of life and the healthcare system. Esophageal fibrotic remodeling is diagnosed through upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, radiological studies, and a functional luminal imaging probe. However, diagnostic underestimation of esophageal strictures and suboptimal adherence to EoE guidelines still represent limitations of current clinical practice. Combined with medical therapy and/or elimination diets, endoscopic dilation remains the cornerstone treatment for esophageal strictures and rings, offering a safe and effective option for managing obstructive symptoms. Different modalities are available for esophageal endoscopic dilation of EoE, including mechanical and balloon dilators. Mechanical dilators provide tactile feedback during the procedure and exert longitudinal and radial forces. In contrast, balloon dilators apply a purely radial force and enable direct visualization of the esophageal mucosa during the procedure. Both mechanical and balloon dilators are safe and effective, with no single modality demonstrating clear superiority. Consequently, the choice of dilation technique is guided by stricture characteristics, the expertise of the endoscopist, and considerations related to the financial and environmental sustainability of the devices. This review aims to summarize the most relevant evidence on the endoscopic evaluation and dilation of fibrostenotic complications in EoE, also providing practical guidance for clinicians to optimize the endoscopic management of these patients.

Background: The vaccination status of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) should be investigated before starting any treatment, and patients eventually vaccinated against vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs). Vaccination rates in patients with IBD are known to be suboptimal. The aim of this study was to investigate the vaccination coverage, attitude towards vaccinations and its possible determinants among a national cohort of IBD patients. Methods: An anonymous web-based questionnaire was sent by the Italian IBD patients’ association (AMICI) in February 2021. Previous vaccination status and patients’ attitude towards vaccinations were rec-orded. The factors influencing their attitudes were examined using crude and adjusted odds ratios (AdjORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 4039 patients invited, 1252 patients (including 729 women, median age 47.7 [37–58]) completed the questionnaire, a response rate of 25.3%. Patients declared being vaccinated against: 74.1% tetanus, 67.7% flu (last season), 43.3% MMR, 37.1% HBV, 29.1% pneumococcus, 20% meningitis, 16% HAV, 15.3% VZV, 7.6% HPV. Two hundred and fifty-nine (20.7%) did not remember every previous vaccination. One thousand one hundred and twelve (88.8%) expressed a positive attitude towards vaccination, 91 (7.3%) were indifferent, 49 (3.9%) reported being opposed to vaccinations. The belief of possible return of VPDs with decline of vaccination coverage rates was the factor most strongly related to a positive at-titude towards vaccinations (AdjOR 5.67, 95% CI 3.45-9.30, p-value <0.001). Conclusions: A low vaccination rate against some VPDs was found among a national cohort of patients with IBD, despite a generally positive attitude towards vaccinations.

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a multifactorial disease characterized by aberrant mucosal immune activation in response to intestinal dysbiosis. Contemporary management strategies aim to target inflammation and microbiome alterations while reducing relapse risk. A multidimensional assessment integrating clinical, inflammatory, immune, and microbial endpoints may better capture therapeutic effects beyond symptom control. Aims: To evaluate whether supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG co-formulated with vitamin D3 (Dicoflor IBD Immuno) as an adjunct to optimized mesalamine (5-ASA) is associated with coordinated changes across clinical and biological domains in mild-to-moderate UC, using a multidimensional assessment framework. Methods: This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial was conducted at Fondazione Ca’ Granda IRCCS Policlinico di Milano between May 2022 and May 2024. Thirty-six patients with mild-to-moderate UC receiving optimized 5-ASA were randomized to LGG+VitD3 (ALD3) or placebo (AP) for 4 weeks. Clinical activity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), fecal calprotectin, peripheral immune cell subsets, and gut microbiota composition were assessed at baseline and week 4. Results: Both 5-ASA-LGG+VitD3 (ALD3)- and 5-ASA-placebo (AP)-treated patients showed significant improvement in clinical activity and HRQoL, without between-group differences. A higher proportion of clinical responders was observed in the ALD3 group, although this was not statistically significant. LGG+VitD3-supplemented patients showed reduced fecal calprotectin levels and increased frequencies of IL-22-producing CD4⁺ T cells. Microbiome analysis revealed enrichment of short-chain fatty acid-producing taxa, including Coprococcus and Fusicatenibacter, in ALD3-treated patients. Conclusions: In patients with mild UC receiving optimized 5-ASA, LGG+VitD3 supplementation does not improve short-term clinical outcomes beyond placebo but is associated with favorable modulation of inflammatory, immune, and microbial parameters, supporting the relevance of multidimensional biological endpoints in adjunctive UC management.