Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, including a known exon 19 deletion (19 del) and exon 21 L858R point mutation (L858R mutation), are strong predictors of the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment in lung adenocarcinoma. However, whether patients carrying EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations exhibit different responsiveness to EGFR-TKIs and what are the potential mechanism for this difference remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations and explore the genetic heterogeneity of tumors with the two mutation subtypes. Of 1127 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR 19 del or L858R mutations, 532 received EGFR-TKI treatment and were included in this study. EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations were detected by using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC). T790M mutation, which is a common resistant mutation on exon 20 of EGFR, was detected by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to explore the genetic heterogeneity of tumors with EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations. Of the 532 patients, 319 (60.0%) had EGFR 19 del, and 213 (40.0%) had L858R mutations. The patients with EGFR 19 del presented a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) for EGFR-TKI treatment (55.2% vs. 43.7%, P = 0.017) and had a longer progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment (14.4 vs. 11.4 months, P = 0.034) compared with those with L858R mutations. However, no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the two groups of patients. T790M mutation status was analyzed in 88 patients before EGFR-TKI treatment and 134 after EGFR-TKI treatment, and there was no significant difference in the co-existence of T790M mutation with EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations before EGFR-TKI treatment (5.6% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.554) or after treatment (24.4% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.176). In addition, 24 patients with EGFR 19 del and 19 with L858R mutations were analyzed by NGS, and no significant difference in the presence of multiple somatic mutations was observed between the two genotypes. Patients with EGFR 19 del exhibit longer PFS and higher ORR compared with those with L858R mutations. Whether the heterogeneity of tumors with EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations contribute to a therapeutic response difference needs further investigation.

Immunotherapy brought long-term benefits for partial patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). The predictor of anti-PD-L1 therapy was controversial and limited in LUSC. We aimed to explore novel biomarker for LUSC immunotherapy and the potential mechanism. Five hundred and twenty-five Chinese patients (Geneplus cohort) with LUSC underwent targeted sequencing and were involved to explore the genomic profiling. TP53 and LRP1B were the most frequently recurrent genes and correlated to higher tumor mutational burden (TMB). We observed that LUSC patients with TP53 and LRP1B co-wild (co-wild type) were associated with better survival of anti-PD-L1 therapy compared with TP53 mutant or LRP1B mutant (mutant type) in POPAR/OAK cohort. Copy-number variation (CNV) and whole genome doubling (WGD) data from TCGA LUSC cohort were obtained to assess the CNV events. There were fewer CNV alterations and lower chromosome instability in patients with TP53/LRP1B co-wild compared with those with TP53/LRP1B mutant. RNA expression data from the TCGA LUSC cohort were collected to explore the differences in RNA expression and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) between mutant and co-wild groups. The TP53/LRP1B co-wild type had a significantly increased proportion of multiple tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), including activated CD8 T cell, activated dendritic cell (DC), and effector memory CD8 T cell. Immune-related gene sets including checkpoint, chemokine, immunostimulatory, MHC and receptors were enriched in the co-wild type. In conclusion, TP53/LRP1B co-wild LUSC conferred an elevated response rate in anti-PD-L1 therapy and improved survival, which was associated with a chromosome-stable phenotype and an activated immune microenvironment.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the highly aggressive malignancies characterized by rapid growth and early metastasis, but treatment options are limited. For SCLC, carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with etoposide chemotherapy has been considered the only standard of care, but the standard first‐line treatment only results in 10‐month survival. The majority of patients relapse within a few weeks to months after treatment, despite the relatively sensitive response to chemotherapy. Over the past decade, immunotherapy has made significant progress in the treatment of SCLC patients. However, there have been limited improvements in survival rates for SCLC patients with the current immune checkpoint inhibitors PD‐1/PD‐L1 and CTLA‐4. In the face of high recurrence rates, small beneficiary populations, and low survival benefits, the exploration of new targets for key molecules and signals in SCLC and the development of drugs with novel mechanisms may provide fresh hope for immunotherapy in SCLC. Therefore, the aim of this review was to explore four new targets, DLL3, TIGIT, LAG‐3, and GD2, which may play a role in the immunotherapy of SCLC to find useful clues and strategies to improve the outcome for SCLC patients.

Purpose: The mechanism of chemo‐resistance in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unclear. This study aims to explore the resistance‐related genomic profiles of residual tumors after neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in SCLC through the whole‐exome sequencing (WES).Experimental design: A total of 416 limited diseases (LD) SCLC patients underwent surgery were retrospectively analyzed, of which 40 patients received NAC. Then we selected 29 patients undergoing NAC (n = 19) and chemotherapy naïve (CTN, n = 10) to perform WES sequence with formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples including tumor and paired para‐tumor.Results: In total, single nucleotide variation and mutation rate were similar between NAC and CTN groups. The mutation signatures were significantly discrepant between NAC and CTN groups, as well as among patients with partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease. There were more copy number variation deletions in NAC group compared with CTN group. The inactivation of TP53 and RB1 were the most significantly events in both NAC and CTN groups. RB1 nonsense mutations were recurrent in NAC group (9/19 vs. 0/9, 47.4% vs. 0%) with favorable survival, while the frame‐shift deletions were frequent in CTN group (3/9 vs. 3/19, 33.3% vs.15.8%). Integrated function enrichment revealed that the frequently mutant genes were involved in cell cycle, metabolic reprogramming, and oncogenic signaling pathways in NAC group, such as BTG2 pathway, glycolysis in senescence and P53 pathway. A total of 27 genes presented frequently mutant in NAC group and might played a positive role in drug resistance. Multiple genes including BRINP3, MYH6, ST18, and PCHD15, which were associated with prognosis, occurred mutant frequently in PR and SD groups.Conclusion: Residual tumors after neo‐adjuvant therapy exhibited different mutation signature spectrum. Multiple genes including RB1 nonsense mutations, BRINP3, MYH6, ST18, and PCHD15 were with frequent mutation in residual tumors, which might participate chemo‐resistance and influenced the prognosis in patients with limited disease SCLC.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitors in the treatment of extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC), we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real‐world studies (RWS).Methods: By scanning PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and other relevant clinical information public databases, nine RCTs and eight RWSs involving 5205 patients were included in the study. We directly compared the differences between chemotherapy and PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, and determined the optimal treatment strategy through network meta‐analysis (NMA).Results: Compared to chemotherapy, the addition of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors significantly improves the overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) in SCLC patients. Regarding safety, both RCTs and RWSs indicated no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events between chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy. NMA showed serplulimab plus chemotherapy (Serp_Chemo) appears to provide the best OS, PFS, and ORR benefit, while nivolumab plus chemotherapy shows higher toxicity than other regimens. In subgroup analysis, for elderly patients (age ≥65) and non‐elderly (age upper limit of normal (ULN), there is no apparent OS benefit from immune therapy.Conclusions: In ES‐SCLC treatment, adding PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors to standard chemotherapy improves OS, PFS, and ORR, with Serp_Chemo shows the most promise. Atez_Chemo and Serp_Chemo provided better survival for elderly and non‐elderly patients, respectively.