Tan San Qing

Tan San Qing


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 September 2022 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPing wangping wang
Ping wangping wang
TQTan San Qing
Tan San Qing
GZGui Zhang
Gui Zhang
WSWang Shuang
Wang Shuang
XWXin Wu
Xin Wu
With the Lutou Forest Farm as the research area, the Lasso algorithm was used for characteristic selection, and the optimal combination of variables was input into the support vector regression (SVR) model. The most suitable SVR model was selected to estimate the aboveground biomass of the forest through the comparison of the kernel function and optimal parameters, and the spatial distribution map of the aboveground biomass in the study area was drawn. The significance analysis of special variables showed good correlations between forest aboveground biomass and each vegetation index. There was a more significant correlation with some remote sensing bands, a less significant correlation with some texture features, and a strong correlation with DEM in the terrain features. When the parameters C is 2 and g is 0.01, the SVR model has the highest precision, which can illustrate 73% of the forest aboveground biomass, with the validation set R2 being 0.62. The statistical analysis of the results shows that the total aboveground biomass of the Lutou Forest Farm is 4.82×105 t. The combination of Lasso with the SVR model can improve the estimation accuracy of forest aboveground biomass, and the model has a strong generalization ability.

27 August 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XWXin Wu
Xin Wu
GZGui Zhang
Gui Zhang
ZYZhigao Yang
Zhigao Yang
TQTan San Qing
Tan San Qing
YYYongke Yang
Yongke Yang
ZPZiheng Pang
Ziheng Pang
Affected by global warming and increased extreme weather, Hunan Province saw a phased and concentrated outbreak of forest fires in 2022, causing significant damage and impact. Predicting the occurrence of forest fires can enhance the ability to make early predictions and strengthen early warning and responses. Currently, fire prevention and extinguishing in China’s forests and grasslands face severe challenges due to the overlapping of natural and social factors. Existing forest fire occurrence prediction models mostly take into account vegetation, topographic, meteorological and human activity factors; however, the occurrence of forest fires is closely related to the forest fuel moisture content. In this study, the traditional driving factors of forest fire such as satellite hotspots, vegetation, meteorology, topography and human activities from 2004 to 2021 were introduced along with forest fuel factors (vegetation canopy water content and evapotranspiration from the top of the vegetation canopy), and a database of factors for predicting forest fire occurrence was constructed. And a forest fire occurrence prediction model was built using machine learning methods such as the Random Forest model (RF), the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree model (GBDT) and the Adaptive Augmentation Model (AdaBoost). The accuracy of the models was verified using Area Under Curve (AUC) and four other metrics. The RF model with an AUC value of 0.981 was more accurate than all other models in predicting the probability of forest fire occurrence, followed by the GBDT (AUC = 0.978) and AdaBoost (AUC = 0.891) models. The RF model, which has the best accuracy, was selected to predict the monthly forest fire probability in Changsha in 2022 and combined with the Inverse Distance Weight Interpolation method to plot the monthly forest fire probability in Changsha. We found that the monthly spatial and temporal distribution of forest fire probability in Changsha varied significantly, with March, April, May, September, October, November and December being the months with higher forest fire probability. The highest probability of forest fires occurred in the central and northern regions. In this study, the core drivers affecting the occurrence of forest fires in Changsha City were found to be vegetation canopy evapotranspiration and vegetation canopy water content. The RF model was identified as a more suitable forest fire occurrence probability prediction model for Changsha City. Meanwhile, this study found that vegetation characteristics and combustible factors have more influence on forest fire occurrence in Changsha City than meteorological factors, and surface temperature has less influence on forest fire occurrence in Changsha City.

27 November 2022 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZPZiheng Pang
Ziheng Pang
GZGui Zhang
Gui Zhang
TQTan San Qing
Tan San Qing
ZYZhigao Yang
Zhigao Yang
XWXin Wu
Xin Wu
The accurate and effective estimation of forest carbon density is an essential basis for effectively responding to climate change and achieving the goal of carbon neutrality. Aiming at the problem of the significant differences in the forest carbon model parameters of different tree species, this study used the tree forest in Yueyang City, Hunan Province, China, as the study object and used the random forest classification algorithm through the Google Earth Engine platform to classify the dominant tree species within the forested range of the study area based on the image elements. The overall accuracy in the forest/non-forest classification (primary classification) was 93.79% with a Kappa of 0.9145. The overall accuracy in the dominant species classification (secondary classification) was 87.30% with a Kappa of 0.7747. Based on the classification, a multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) were constructed for different dominant tree species by combining some Forest Resource Inventory data and remote sensing data. The results showed that the RF model had a significantly higher coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.4054–0.7602) than the MLR (R2 = 0.0900–0.4070) and SVM (R2 = 0.1650–0.4450) as well as a substantially lower RMSE and MAE; its spatial distribution of forest carbon density ranged from 3.06 to 62.80 t·hm−2. Compared with the spatial distribution of the forest carbon density (4.64 to 31.96 t·hm−2) without the classification of dominant species, the method eliminated the problems of severe overfitting and significant underestimation of peak values when estimating under unclassified conditions. The method provides a reference for the remote sensing inversion of forest carbon density on a large scale.