Ornella Spagnolello

Dr. Ornella Spagnolello

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 October 2021 in Journal of Medical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gabriele d'EttorreGabriele d'Ettorre
Gabriele d'Ettorre
ECElio Gentilini Cacciola
Elio Gentilini Cacciola
Letizia SantinelliLetizia Santinelli
Letizia Santinelli
GGGabriella De Girolamo
Gabriella De Girolamo
OSOrnella Spagnolello
Ornella Spagnolello
Giancarlo CeccarelliGiancarlo Ceccarelli
Giancarlo Ceccarelli
Despite the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic not yet being under control, post‐Covid‐19 syndrome is already a challenging topic: long‐term multiorgan sequelae, although increasingly described, have not yet been systematized. As post‐Covid‐19 syndrome can significantly impact both the working capacity and the relationship life of surviving patients, we performed a systematic review of the evidence published over the last year and currently available in medical literature search databases (MEDLINE/Pubmed) and searching clinical trial registries, to evaluate the available evidence among workers. From 31 publications that initially matched inclusion criteria, 13 studies have been considered suitable for relevance and age of subjects. A wide range of patients (16%–87%) have post‐Covid syndrome; pneumological and neuropsychological symptoms were the most common disorders reported. The most frequent organic sequel found in post‐Covid patients was pulmonary fibrosis. The number of symptoms during acute SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, severity of the disease, and high serum levels of d‐dimer were related to high risk of post‐Covid syndrome. In conclusion, post‐Covid‐19 syndrome can significantly impact the health conditions of surviving patients. Rehabilitation and follow‐up in multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs should be considered for working‐age patients.

19 November 2020 in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OSOrnella Spagnolello
Ornella Spagnolello
SRSilvia Rota
Silvia Rota
OVOliviero Francesco Valoti
Oliviero Francesco Valoti
CCClaudio Cozzini
Claudio Cozzini
PPPietro Parrino
Pietro Parrino
MLMartin Langer
Martin Langer
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic represented an unprecedented challenge for health care facilities, and innovative solutions were urgently required to overcome the high volume of critically ill infectious patients, limit in-hospital outbreaks, and limit the risk of occupational infection for health care workers (HCWs). Bergamo was the hardest-hit Italian province by COVID-19, and the local health care system had to undergo a profound and prompt reorganization. A COVID-19-only field hospital was rapidly set up meeting the standards for severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) treatment centers (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331603). A zones partition, dedicated in-hospital pathways for HCWs, strict infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, and constant staff supervision were key components of our strategy to limit the risk of occupational infection for HCWs. Herein, we present the Bergamo field hospital layout enlightening fundamental IPC measures adopted as a valuable example of a SARI treatment center confronting COVID-19.

10 June 2022 in Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OSOrnella Spagnolello
Ornella Spagnolello
SEShekiba Esmati
Shekiba Esmati
AAAbdul Fahim Amiri
Abdul Fahim Amiri
MSMir Abdul Azim Shahir
Mir Abdul Azim Shahir
SGSofia Gatti
Sofia Gatti
MLMartin Langer
Martin Langer
Background Terrorist attacks with large numbers of civilian victims are not uncommon in war-torn countries, and present a unique challenge for health care facilities with limited resources. However, these events are largely under-reported and little is known about how the mass casualty events (MCE) are handled outside of a military setting. Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of the MCE which ensued the Kabul Airport suicide attack (26th August 2021) at the Kabul EMERGENCY’NGO Hospital (Afghanistan). Results Within six hours 93 causalities presented at our hospital. Out of them, 36 severe injured were admitted. Mean age was 30.8 years (SD 10.1). The most common injury mechanism was shell fragments. The most common injury site was head (63%; 23/36), followed by limbs (55.5%; 20/36) and thoracoabdominal region (30.5%; 11/36). Combined injuries occurred in 38.9% of cases. Patients receiving surgery presented more combined injuries in comparison with patients receiving only medical treatment (47.1% vs 31.6%). Thoraco-abdomen (25.0% vs 15.4%) and/or extremity injury (42.9% vs 28.6%) were more prevalent in the surgical group. Thirty major surgical procedures were carried out on 17 patients in the nine hours following the first arrival. The rate of Intensive Care Unit/High Dependency Unit admission was 36.1% and the 30-day in-hospital mortality was 16.6% (6/36). All deaths were recorded in the first 24 hours and none of them received surgery. Conclusions A large number of wounded patients must be anticipated after suicide bombing attacks. The authors report the challenges faced and key aspects of their management of MCEs. Level of Evidence Retrospective analysis/incident management

6 October 2020 in Emergency Medicine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OSOrnella Spagnolello
Ornella Spagnolello
GCGiancarlo Ceccarelli
Giancarlo Ceccarelli
CBCristian Borrazzo
Cristian Borrazzo
AMAngela Macrì
Angela Macrì
MSMarianna Suppa
Marianna Suppa
GDGabriella D'ETtorre
Gabriella D'ETtorre
Background Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score is a bedside prognostic tool for patients with suspected infection outside the intensive care unit (ICU), which is particularly useful when laboratory analyses are not readily available. However, its performance in potentially septic patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) needs to be examined further, especially in relation to early outcomes affecting acute management. Objective First, to compare the performance of qSOFA and CURB-65 in the prediction of mortality in the emergency department in patients presenting with CAP. Second, to study patients who required critical care support (CCS) and ICU admission. Methods Between January and December 2017, a 1-year retrospective observational study was carried out of adult (≥18 years old) patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) of our hospital (Rome, Italy) with CAP. The accuracy of qSOFA, qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 was compared in predicting mortality in the ED, CCS requirement and ICU admission. The concordance among scores ≥2 was then assessed for 30-day estimated mortality prediction. Results 505 patients with CAP were enrolled. Median age was 71.0 years and mortality rate in the ED was 4.7%. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of qSOFA-65, CURB-65 and qSOFA in predicting mortality rate in the ED were 0.949 (95% CI 0.873 to 0.976), 0.923 (0.867 to 0.980) and 0.909 (0.847 to 0.971), respectively. The likelihood ratio of a patient having a qSOFA score ≥2 points was higher than for qSOFA-65 or CURB-65 (11 vs 7 vs 6.7). The AUCs of qSOFA, qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 in predicting CCS requirement were 0.862 (95% CI 0.802 to 0.923), 0.824 (0.758 to 0.890) and 0.821 (0.754 to 0.888), respectively. The AUCs of qSOFA-65, qSOFA and CURB-65 in predicting ICU admission were 0.593 (95% CI 0.511 to 0.676), 0.585 (0.503 to 0.667) and 0.570 (0.488 to 0.653), respectively. The concordance between qSOFA-65 and CURB-65 in 30-day estimated mortality prediction was 93%. Conclusion qSOFA is a valuable score for predicting mortality in the ED and for the prompt identification of patients with CAP requiring CCS. qSOFA-65 may further improve the performance of this useful score, showing also good concordance with CURB-65 in 30-day estimated mortality prediction.

26 February 2021 in Current HIV Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OSOrnella Spagnolello
Ornella Spagnolello
BGBernadette Gallagher
Bernadette Gallagher
NLNazir Lone
Nazir Lone
Giancarlo CeccarelliGiancarlo Ceccarelli
Giancarlo Ceccarelli
Gabriella d'EttorreGabriella d'Ettorre
Gabriella d'Ettorre
MRMatthew Reed
Matthew Reed
Background: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection continues to expand worldwide, and a significant proportion of infection is still undiagnosed. Recent studies have addressed the impact and feasibility of ‘opt-out’ HIV screening in Emergency Departments (EDs) in urban settings at high HIV prevalence, whereas little is known about the yield of implementing ‘targeted’ HIV testing, especially in low-prevalence areas. Objective: The present study undertakes a scoping review of research carried out on the implementation of targeted HIV screening of adult in EDs to determine the impact, feasibility and acceptability of HIV testing in different HIV prevalence settings. Design: Online databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE) were used to identify papers published between 2000 to 2020. A three-concept search was employed with HIV (HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus infection, HIV infections), targeted testing (Target, screening or testing) and emergency medicine (Emergency Service, emergency ward, A&E, accident and emergency or Emergency Department) (28th February 2020). Only full-text articles written in English, French, Spanish or Italian and using impact and/or feasibility and/or acceptability of the program as primary or secondary outcomes were analysed. Results: The search provided 416 articles. Of these, 12 met inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Most of the included studies were carried out in the United States (n=8; 67%) and in areas of high HIV prevalence (n=11; 92%). Three (20%) were randomized control studies. While the rate of newly diagnosed HIV cases varied widely (0.03-2.2%), likely due to methodological heterogeneity between studies, the linkage of new HIV diagnosis was often high (80-100%) and median CD4+ cell count was always greater than 200 cells per microliter. Targeted HIV screening was found to be cost-effective (out of 2 studies) and well accepted by participants (out 2 studies). Conclusions: Targeted HIV screening at the ED can be impactful, feasible and well accepted, but often requires extra funding and staff. Most previous work has focused on areas of high disease prevalence.

1 December 2019 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OSOrnella Spagnolello
Ornella Spagnolello
MMManuela De Michele
Manuela De Michele
SLSvetlana Lorenzano
Svetlana Lorenzano
EIEmanuele Cerulli Irelli
Emanuele Cerulli Irelli
FNFederico Naitana
Federico Naitana
DTDanilo Toni
Danilo Toni
Background and Purpose—: Prognostic value of copeptin in acute ischemic stroke has been widely reported. This study aimed to evaluate copeptin temporal profile according to revascularization strategies and the development of brain edema and hemorrhagic transformation. Methods—: Plasma copeptin and brain edema and hemorrhagic transformation assessed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated upon admission ( T0 ), at 24 hours ( T1 ), and between the third and fifth day of hospitalization ( T2 ) in 34 acute ischemic stroke patients. Results—: Median copeptin concentration was 50.71 pmol/L at T0 , 18.31 pmol/L at T1 , and 10.92 pmol/L at T2 . Copeptin at T1 was higher in patients with medium/severe brain edema at T2 (32.25 versus 13.67 pmol/L; P =0.038) and hemorrhagic transformation at T1 (93.10 versus 13.67 pmol/L; P <0.003) and T2 (85.70 versus 14.45 pmol/L; P =0.024). Copeptin level drop (CopΔ T1−T0 ) was significantly steeper in patients receiving revascularization, particularly in those undergoing combined therapy (−129.34 versus −5.43 pmol/L; P =0.038). Δ T1−T0 also correlated with Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ( P <0.001). Conclusions—: Copeptin resulted associated with brain edema and hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke, and its drop at 24 hours may mirror effective brain vessel recanalization.