Leo Posthuma

Prof. Leo Posthuma

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, De Bilt, The Netherlands
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2020 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sebastian BirkSebastian Birk
Sebastian Birk
DCDaniel Stephen Chapman
Daniel Stephen Chapman
LCLaurence Carvalho
Laurence Carvalho
BSBryan M. Spears
Bryan M. Spears
HAHans Estrup Andersen
Hans Estrup Andersen
DHDaniel Hering
Daniel Hering

1 March 2019 in EFSA Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEFSA Scientific Committee
EFSA Scientific Committee
SMSimon More
Simon More
VBVasileios Bampidis
Vasileios Bampidis
DBDiane Benford
Diane Benford
SBSusanne Hougaard Bennekou
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
GRGuido Rychen
Guido Rychen
This Guidance document describes harmonised risk assessment methodologies for combined exposure to multiple chemicals for all relevant areas within EFSA's remit, i.e. human health, animal health and ecological areas. First, a short review of the key terms, scientific basis for combined exposure risk assessment and approaches to assessing (eco)toxicology is given, including existing frameworks for these risk assessments. This background was evaluated, resulting in a harmonised framework for risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals. The framework is based on the risk assessment steps (problem formulation, exposure assessment, hazard identification and characterisation, and risk characterisation including uncertainty analysis), with tiered and stepwise approaches for both whole mixture approaches and component‐based approaches. Specific considerations are given to component‐based approaches including the grouping of chemicals into common assessment groups, the use of dose addition as a default assumption, approaches to integrate evidence of interactions and the refinement of assessment groups. Case studies are annexed in this guidance document to explore the feasibility and spectrum of applications of the proposed methods and approaches for human and animal health and ecological risk assessment. The Scientific Committee considers that this Guidance is fit for purpose for risk assessments of combined exposure to multiple chemicals and should be applied in all relevant areas of EFSA's work. Future work and research are recommended.

1 January 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WBWerner Brack
Werner Brack
VDValeria Dulio
Valeria Dulio
MÅMarlene Ågerstrand
Marlene Ågerstrand
IAIan Allan
Ian Allan
RARolf Altenburger
Rolf Altenburger
BVBranislav Vrana
Branislav Vrana

1 October 2005 in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DZDick de Zwart
Dick de Zwart
LPLeo Posthuma
Leo Posthuma
Methods for the assessment of ecological risks associated with exposure to defined mixtures of toxicants are reviewed and formalized for single-species toxicity. Depending on the modes of action of toxicants in a mixture, these methods apply either the model for concentration additivity (CA) or the model for response additivity (RA). For complex mixtures, the present paper advocates the use of a new, two-step, mixed-model approach as a logical extension of model selection: Mixture toxicity for individual modes of action is evaluated with the CA model, and the toxicities of different modes of action are combined using the RA model. Using comparable mixture toxicity strategies in combination with the concept of species-sensitivity distributions, we develop a method to address and predict the risk for direct effects on the composition of species assemblages and biodiversity. The data needed for modeling can be obtained from existing databases, and lack of data can, in part, be addressed by the use of toxicity patterns in those databases. Both single- and multiple-species methods of mixture risk prediction are useful for risk management, because they allow ranking of polluted sites and affected species as well as identification of the most hazardous contaminants, at least in a comparative way. Validation of the proposed methods is feasible but currently limited because of a lack of appropriate data.

24 January 2019 in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLeo Posthuma
Leo Posthuma
JGJos van Gils
Jos van Gils
MZMichiel C. Zijp
Michiel C. Zijp
DMDik van de Meent
Dik van de Meent
DZDick de Zwart
Dick de Zwart
: The present study considers the collection and use of ecotoxicity data for risk assessment with species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) of chemical pollution in surface water, which are used to quantify the likelihood that critical effect levels are exceeded. This fits the European Water Framework Directive, which suggests using models to assess the likelihood that chemicals affect water quality for management prioritization. We derived SSDs based on chronic and acute ecotoxicity test data for 12 386 compounds. The log-normal SSDs are characterized by the median and the standard deviation of log-transformed ecotoxicity data and by a quality score. A case study illustrates the utility of SSDs for water quality assessment and management prioritization. We quantified the chronic and acute mixture toxic pressure of mixture exposures for >22 000 water bodies in Europe for 1760 chemicals for which we had both exposure and hazard data. The results show the likelihood of mixture exposures exceeding a negligible effect level and increasing species loss. The SSDs in the present study represent a versatile and comprehensive approach to prevent, assess, and manage chemical pollution problems. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:905–917. © 2019 SETAC Abstract Graph illustrating our contribution to an increased ability to provide environmental decision support with species sensitivity distributions. LCA = life cycle assessment.

1 January 2020 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EDElina Drakvik
Elina Drakvik
RARolf Altenburger
Rolf Altenburger
YAYasunobu Aoki
Yasunobu Aoki
TBThomas Backhaus
Thomas Backhaus
TBTina Bahadori
Tina Bahadori
ÅBÅke Bergman
Åke Bergman
The number of anthropogenic chemicals, manufactured, by-products, metabolites and abiotically formed transformation products, counts to hundreds of thousands, at present. Thus, humans and wildlife are exposed to complex mixtures, never one chemical at a time and rarely with only one dominating effect. Hence there is an urgent need to develop strategies on how exposure to multiple hazardous chemicals and the combination of their effects can be assessed. A workshop, "Advancing the Assessment of Chemical Mixtures and their Risks for Human Health and the Environment" was organized in May 2018 together with Joint Research Center in Ispra, EU-funded research projects and Commission Services and relevant EU agencies. This forum for researchers and policy-makers was created to discuss and identify gaps in risk assessment and governance of chemical mixtures as well as to discuss state of the art science and future research needs. Based on the presentations and discussions at this workshop we want to bring forward the following Key Messages.