Smart Rings (SRs) are user-friendly devices capable of measuring various health parameters, making them suitable for remote continuous monitoring in diverse clinical settings. Since the available evidence on the accuracy of SRs recording health data is highly heterogeneous, this systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searched for articles evaluating the efficacy of SRs for sleep, respiratory, and cardiovascular monitoring across the PubMed, SCOPUS, and ProQuest databases. Meta-analyses were conducted for health outcomes evaluated in at least three studies with a comparable study population and design, and the same comparison device. Nineteen articles were included: eleven analyses focused on sleep quality, eight on cardiovascular parameters, and one on oxygen saturation. Studies analysing cardiovascular outcomes found a good accuracy of SRs in measuring heart rate (HR) with a mean bias of −0.4 bpms (limits of agreement (LoAs): −2.7; 1.8). The meta-analyses showed variability in SRs’ efficacy in monitoring total sleep time (mean bias: −21.3 min, LoAs: −69.9, 27.4) and REM duration (mean bias: −18.2 min, LoAs: −33.3, −3.1). The results highlighted the promising potential of SRs for HR monitoring. Further research is needed to clarify the reliability of SRs in monitoring sleep quality and their use directed to a broader range of health parameters. With further development, SRs could become valuable tools for healthcare professionals.

(1) Background: vaccination is the most effective way to prevent influenza and reduce its complications. The main aim of the study is to assess a possible increase of parents’/caregivers’ pediatric flu vaccination adherence due to a nasal administration as an alternative to injection in Bologna. (2) Methods: 169 parents/guardians of children who were joining the COVID-19 pediatric vaccination session in Bologna were interviewed. The results were summarized using descriptive statistics. A multiple logistic regression model was used to assess the determinants of the change in flu vaccine uptake if offered without injection administration. All analyses were conducted using STATA and R-Studio software. (3) Results: Only 29.0% of parents were informed about pediatric flu vaccination by pediatricians, and 32.5% heard about pediatric flu vaccination. Almost 72.2% of parents declared that they would not have their children vaccinated against influenza. Thus, 40.2% of them changed their opinion after being informed about the existence of a non-injective vaccine. Needle fear in children turned out to be a determinant of this opinion change (OR = 3.79; 95% CI = 1.63–9.43; p = 0.003). (4) Conclusions: the study has confirmed that needle fear is a determinant of vaccine hesitancy and that a different method of administration may increase parents’/guardians’ adherence.

Research on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and misinformation endorsement among Spanish-speaking Americans is limited. This cross-sectional study used a Spanish-language survey from May–August 2021 among 483 Spanish speakers living in the US and Puerto Rico. We applied multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variances to assess the association between independent variables and binary outcomes for vaccine acceptance versus hesitance, as well as misinformation endorsement. Vaccine acceptance was associated with COVID-19 risk perception score (PR = 1.7 high vs. low perceived risk), opinion of government transparency (PR = 2.2 very transparent vs. not transparent), and trust in vaccine information (PR = 1.8 high vs. low). There was also an interaction between time spent on social media and social media as a main source of COVID-19 information (p = 0.0484). Misinformation endorsement was associated with opinion about government transparency (PR = 0.5 moderately vs. not transparent), trust in vaccine information (PR = 0.5 high vs. low trust), social media impact on vaccine confidence (PR = 2.1 decreased vs. increased confidence), distrust vaccines (PR = 1.9 distrust vs. trust), using vaccine information from Facebook (PR = 1.4 yes vs. no), and time spent on social media by those using social media as main source of COVID-19 vaccine information (p = 0.0120). Vaccine acceptance in respondents with high misinformation endorsement scores was 0.7 times those with low scores. These findings highlight the importance of effective information dissemination, the positive role of social media, and government transparency in boosting vaccine uptake among Spanish speakers in the US.

Background and Objective: One of the most delicate events in an older persons life is the entrance to a residential care facility (RCF). For institutionalized individuals, maintaining autonomy and a good physical, mental and social health is crucial, and this can be achieved through a...

Background and Objective: In a previous trial on osteoporotic women with past vertebral fractures, we found a significant improvement of some physical performance markers after a 6 months Adapted Physical Activity (APA) program. In this study – using the Capability Opportunity Motivation...