Jacques Raphael

Dr. Jacques Raphael

1. London Regional Cancer Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSyed Hussaini
Syed Hussaini
RCRania Chehade
Rania Chehade
GBGabriel Boldt
Gabriel Boldt
JRJacques Raphael
Jacques Raphael
PBPhillip S. Blanchette
Phillip S. Blanchette
Ricardo FernandesRicardo Fernandes
Ricardo Fernandes

1 March 2015 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJacques Raphael
Jacques Raphael
MTM.E. Trudeau
M.E. Trudeau
KCK. Chan
K. Chan
Background An increasing number of young women are delaying childbearing; hence, more are diagnosed with breast cancer (bca) before having a family. No clear recommendations are currently available for counselling such a population on the safety of carrying a pregnancy during bca or becoming pregnant after treatment for bca. Methods Using a Web-based search of PubMed we reviewed the recent literature about bca and pregnancy. Our objective was to report outcomes for patients diagnosed with bca during pregnancy, comparing them with outcomes for non-pregnant women, and to evaluate prognosis in women diagnosed with and treated for bca who subsequently became pregnant. Results “Pregnancy and bca” should be divided into two entities. Pregnancy-associated bca tends to be more aggressive and advanced in stage at diagnosis than bca in control groups; hence, it has a poorer prognosis. With respect to pregnancy after bca, there is, despite the bias in reported studies and meta-analyses, no clear evidence for a different or worse disease outcome in bca patients who become pregnant after treatment compared with those who do not. Conclusions Pregnancy-associated bca should be treated as aggressively as and according to the standards applicable in nonpregnant women; pregnancy after bca does not jeopardize outcome. The guidelines addressing risks connected to pregnancy and bca lack a high level of evidence for better counselling young women about pregnancy considerations and preventing unnecessary abortions. Ideally, evidence from large prospective randomized trials would set better guidelines, and yet the complexity of such studies limits their feasibility.

1 November 2017 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJacques Raphael
Jacques Raphael
JHJoelle Helou
Joelle Helou
KPK.I. Pritchard
K.I. Pritchard
DND.M. Naimark
D.M. Naimark

7 January 2024 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVSaurav Verma
Saurav Verma
SYSympascho Young
Sympascho Young
GBGabriel Boldt
Gabriel Boldt
PBPhillip Blanchette
Phillip Blanchette
MLMichael Lock
Michael Lock
JRJacques Raphael
Jacques Raphael

1 March 2018 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJacques Raphael
Jacques Raphael
DDDanielle Desautels
Danielle Desautels
KPKathleen I. Pritchard
Kathleen I. Pritchard
EPEkaterina Petkova
Ekaterina Petkova
PSPrakeshkumar S. Shah
Prakeshkumar S. Shah

1 March 2020 in Clinical Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJacques Raphael
Jacques Raphael
ABAnupam Batra
Anupam Batra
GBGabriel Boldt
Gabriel Boldt
PSPrakesh S. Shah
Prakesh S. Shah
PBPhillip Blanchette
Phillip Blanchette
MVMark D. Vincent
Mark D. Vincent