A utilização de implantes na reabilitação oral tem sido bastante utilizada desde a década de 1980, esse tipo de reabilitação requer uma quantidade óssea suficiente para estabilização primaria do implante. Em situações clinicas onde a quantidade óssea seja insuficiente, faz-se necessária cirurgia de enxertia para reposição desse tecido. Nessa mesma década, Tatum introduziu duas técnicas para levantamento de seio maxilar: uma traumática via janela lateral e uma atraumática através da crista. Algumas variações dessas técnicas foram descritas e novas técnicas sugeridas. Nessa revisão o objetivo foi identificar e comparar as principais técnicas de levantamento de seio maxilar, podendo concluir que a técnica traumática descrita por Tatum e a atraumática preconizada por Summers tem sua eficácia comprovada por vários autores, entretanto as outras modificações realizadas necessitam de mais estudos para comprovar sua eficácia.
Resin-based composites (RBCs) have transformed restorative dentistry and its procedures. However, the characteristics of RBCs have been modified over the years to enhance the physical and chemical properties of the materials. This context raises the need for studies that evaluate whether the properties of the RBCs that are commercially available are clinically adequate with different curing modes. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical behavior of commercial RBCs after undergoing different curing modes. Twenty-three RBCs of different classes were evaluated. For curing the specimens, a microwave (BMS45, Brastemp) (for 3 min at 450 W) and three LED units were used: an Emitter A Fit (Schuster (second generation)) (light-curing for 15 s with an irradiance of 1250 mW/cm2), VALO (Ultradent (third generation)) (light-curing for 15 s with an irradiance of 1100 mW/cm2), and Emitter Now Duo (Schuster (second generation)) (light-curing for 15 s with an irradiance of 1100 mW/cm2). A total of 670 RBC specimens of 8 mm in diameter and 1 mm in depth were obtained. Afterward, a biaxial flexure strength test was performed until the failure of the specimens, using a universal testing machine set at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The same specimens were subjected to infrared spectroscopy for evaluating the degree of conversion. Tukey’s test was used for multiple comparisons at a significance level of 5%. The light-curing mode did not affect the flexure strength of the RBCs (p > 0.05), but the type and shade of RBCs did so (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the type of RBC directly interferes with the mechanical behavior of the material. However, the curing modes within the same RBC did not change the mechanical properties.
Background: Marginal adaptation is one of biggest challenges in restorative dentistry, mainly in restoration of composite resin. Even with development of lower shrinkage materials, like those which use the polymer silorane, it is necessary a faithful clinical protocol in order to obtain better results and more clinical durability of restorative procedure. The purpose of this study was investigated if different polymers can influence on marginal adaptation of different composite resin restorations. Material and methods: Twenty class V cavities were confectioned in twenty human molars in a standardized way. Ten dentists received one tooth each and a questionnaire to describe their own clinical protocol. The other 10 teeth were restored by one researcher as control group. The cavities received the adhesive system than increments of composite resin, and so the restorations were finished with finishing bur (KG Sorensen, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) to remove the excess, followed by sof-lex discs (3M ESPE). After this stage, all of specimens were embedded in 1% Methylene blue (Prolabo, Paris, France) during 48 h. The evaluation of pigment penetration into the interfaces was performed after specimens were washed in distilled water and longitudinally sectioned with steel Diamond disc in low velocity. Results: There was significant statistical difference between the different techniques using compose resin. Conclusions: it was possible conclude that the clinical protocol to perform dental restoration interfere dramatically in the final results of restorative procedure.
This review proposes to present some aspects of dental ceramics surface treatments, which involve the related physical and mechanical properties, as well as new technologies. The correct cementation of prosthetic restoration is essential for clinical success. However, the adhesive technique is a very recent procedure and clinicians should have a more detailed knowledge about the technique and related materials so that they can use them in their day-to-day clinical practice. Information about the the principles, indications and contraindications of adhesive cementation technique were obtained from the literature. The studies indicate that the adhesive system seems to be a valid option for fixed prosthesis cementation, since it has several advantages over conventional cementation method, especially in all-ceramic restorations. In clinical practice, the clinician should always keep in mind the characteristics of the material they are working with, so that they can select the best technique and the best cement for each clinical situation. Although more research is required in this field, there are no scientific reasons to contraindicate in routine practice.