Energy poverty, defined as a lack of access to reliable electricity and reliance on traditional biomass resources for cooking, affects over a billion people daily. The World Health Organization estimates that household air pollution from inefficient stoves causes more premature deaths than malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS. Increasing demand for energy has led to dramatic increases in emissions. The need for reliable electricity and limiting emissions drives research on Resilient Hybrid Energy Systems (RHESs), which provide cleaner energy through combining wind, solar, and biomass energy with traditional fossil energy, increasing production efficiency and reliability and reducing generating costs and emissions. Microgrids have been shown as an efficient means of implementing RHESs, with some focused mainly on reducing the environmental impact of electric power generation. The technical challenges of designing, implementing, and applying microgrids involve conducting a cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) to evaluate these systems’ environmental and economic performance under diverse operating conditions to evaluate resiliency. A sample RHES was developed and used to demonstrate the implementation in rural applications, where the system can provide reliable electricity for heating, cooling, lighting, and pumping clean water. The model and findings can be utilized by other regions around the globe facing similar challenges.

This research delves into the co-pyrolysis of refuse-derived fuel (RDF) and oil shale (OS), utilizing a 50% weight ratio for each component. The study employs a fixed-bed reactor, augmented by electrical kiln heating, to conduct the co-pyrolysis process. A significant aspect of this research is the use of Aspen Plus software for process simulation, with the simulated results undergoing validation through experimental data. A commendable correlation was observed between the experimental outcomes and the model predictions, underscoring the reliability of the simulation approach. The investigation reveals distinct product yields from the pyrolysis of 100% RDF and 100% OS. Specifically, the pyrolysis of pure RDF yielded 45.26% gas, 20.67% oil, and 34.07% char by weight. In contrast, the pyrolysis of pure OS resulted in 14.51% gas, 8.32% liquid, and a significant 77.61% char by weight. The co-pyrolysis of RDF and OS in a 50% blend altered the product distribution to 31.98% gas, 12.58% liquid, and 55.09% char by weight. Furthermore, the Aspen Plus simulation model aligned closely with these findings, predicting yields of 31.40% gas, 11.9% oil, and 56.6% char by weight for the RDF-OS blend. This study not only elucidates the co-pyrolysis behavior of RDF and OS but also contributes valuable insights into the potential of these materials to address the pressing issue of plastic waste management and energy resource utilization. The findings underscore the efficacy of RDF and OS co-pyrolysis as a viable strategy for enhancing the value extraction from waste and underutilized energy resources, presenting a promising avenue for environmental and energy sustainability.