As the first and the most time consuming step of product recovery, disassembly is described as the systematic separation of constituent parts from end-of-life products through a series of operations. In this context, designing and balancing disassembly lines are critical in terms of the efficiency of product recovery. Recent research on disassembly line balancing (DLB) has focused on classical stations where only one worker is allocated. However, such a line results in larger space requirement and longer disassembly lead time. In this paper, disassembly line balancing problem (DLBP) with multi-manned stations is introduced to the relevant literature as a solution to overcome these disadvantages. A mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model and two novel framework heuristic algorithms are developed to minimise the number of workers and workstations. MILP model has been applied to a dishwasher disassembly system. The application results indicate the superiority of establishing multi-manned stations over classical disassembly system design with single-worker stations with shorter disassembly lead time (80.9%) and line length (60.2%). Moreover, the proposed heuristics have been compared on newly generated test problems (instances) for DLBP. The results validate that the heuristics provide acceptable solutions in a reasonable amount of time even for large-sized problems.

Single-minute exchange of dies (SMED) is one of the most significant lean tools which reduces the required time for setup operations. The consideration of appropriate ergonomic interferences during the SMED implementation improves working conditions, productivity, and flexibility. The SMED literature has an opportunity for expansion with ergonomic assessment. Moreover, ergonomic assessment studies have various limitations in terms of a broad hierarchy of ergonomic factors and their weighting. Therefore, this study enriches the literature by providing the ergonomic assessment of the setup process through integrating multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) into SMED. In this context, a wide hierarchy of ergonomic risk factors is compiled for ergonomic assessment. The Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVPF-AHP) method is used to determine the weights of factors. Then, Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is used to prioritize setup tasks in terms of ergonomic factors by using the Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets (IVPFSs). The proposed model was validated by applying it to a real-life manufacturing system in the white goods supplier industry. The application results justify the proposed model with a setup time reduction of 58% and an ergonomic improvement of 19%.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how intelligence techniques have been used in information management systems. Design/methodology/approach – The results of a literature review on intelligence decision systems used in enterprise information management are analyzed. The intelligence techniques used in enterprise information management are briefly summarized. Findings – Intelligence techniques are rapidly emerging as new tools in information management systems. Especially, intelligence techniques can be used to utilize the decision process of enterprises information management. These techniques can increase sensitiveness, flexibility and accuracy of information management systems. The hybrid systems that contain two or more intelligence techniques will be more used in the future. Originality/value – The intelligence decision systems are briefly introduced and then a literature review is given to show how intelligence techniques have been used in information management systems.