Leaded fuel has been reported to contain certain amounts of toxic trace metals such as Pb and Cadmium (Cd), which may have negative impacts on humans and the environment. Unleaded fuel was introduced to South Africa in 2006 with the aim of reducing and eventually eliminating the negative impact of leaded fuel on the environment. However, trace metals are usually nonbiodegradable, and it may therefore be necessary to monitor their presence in the environment so as to evaluate their possible impact on human health. The present study evaluated the levels of Pb and other heavy metals in soil samples collected from petrol (gas) filling stations and from busy roads just around the filling stations in Pretoria, South Africa, fifteen years after the introduction of unleaded fuel. A total of twenty-four (24) soil samples were analysed for lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), titanium (Ti), and cadmium (Cd) using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). The results showed that the concentrations of the trace metals were in the following ranges: Pb, 0.08 ± 0.02–188.36 ± 15.32 ug/g; Mn, 5.35 ± 0.34–6842.43 ± 1.35 ug/g; Zn, 1.82 ± 0.22–9814.89 ± 22.32 ug/g; As, 0.21 ± 0.00–8.42 ± 2.44 ug/g; Cu, 10.51 ± 3.41–859 ± 0.09 ug/g; Cr, 5.80 ± 2.21–417.70 ± 9.08 ug/g; Ti, 19.94 ± 4.99–1036.12 ± 1.49 ug/g; and Fe, 3.06 ± 7.87–674.07 ± 12.22 mg/g. The highest concentrations from all the elements were recorded for Fe in all the collected soil samples. The concentrations of Pb in the soils collected from sites associated with high traffic and industrial areas were higher than for those from all other sites, and the differences were significant (p < 0.05). The pollution index (PI), which is the anthropogenic influence of the trace metals, and the geoaccumulation (Igeo), which allows for the removal of possible variations as regards the studied element in the soil due to the possible differences in the background value, showed that some samples were enriched anthropogenically. The PI for Ni, Pb, Cu, and Cr indicated highly anthropogenically contaminated soils, especially at sites associated with high traffic volumes and in industrial areas. The Igeo showed moderately polluted areas for Pb and Cu in high-traffic areas. The exposure routes for the toxic trace metals that were of concern in the study were either through ingestion or dermal contact. The calculated hazard quotient showed both noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risks for Fe and Mn via ingestion and through dermal contact for both children and adults, respectively. The concentrations of Pb were high and similar to those that were previously reported in the study and pointed to vehicular emission as one of the contributors. The study also noticed an increase in the presence of Mn and Fe in all soil samples.

Over the years, prostate cancer (PCa) research has been of great interest, and trace metals have attracted a lot of attention due to their association with prostate cancer development and progression. PCa has a complex etiology, with genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors being implicated. Trace metals such as zinc (Zn), mercury (Hg), selenium (Se), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), and nickel (Ni) have garnered much attention in recent years, suspected of having direct links to the modulation of cancer risk and progression through their impacts on prostate cancer omics (genomics, epigenetics, proteomics, and transcriptomics). This has led to them being the subject of extensive research in this regard. In this review, we explored the influence of trace metals and offered a comprehensive analysis of the current knowledge on how trace metals affect the biology of prostate cancer at a molecular level by integrating findings from the recent literature to help suggest possible directions for future research.

Heavy metal contamination in drinking water remains a pervasive global challenge with significant consequences for environmental quality and human health. This review synthesizes findings from recent studies examining heavy metal concentrations in different sources of drinking water, including municipal tap water, groundwater, surface water, and bottled/sachet water across various geographical regions. The study used a systematic review of studies published from 2015 to 2024. The result showed a variation in the concentrations of heavy metals from all the sources, with tap water generally exhibiting lower heavy metal levels. Pb, Fe, Mn, and other metals persist in different sources and from many regions with levels above the permissible limits recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in some instances, which were sometimes linked to aging distribution systems and other pollution sources. Bottled and sachet water, commonly regarded as safer alternatives, also showed some levels of heavy metals such as Pb, Cd, and Cr, reflecting inconsistent packaging or production oversight. Surface waters display variability with heavy metals pollution, driven by industrial discharge, mining activities, agricultural runoff, and urban wastewater inputs. Groundwater sources, although naturally shielded, frequently contained elevated concentrations of As, Hg, and Ni due to both geological and anthropogenic factors. Pb concentrations were below detection limit in some of the published papers; however, the values reported in this study ranged from ND to 260.0 µg/L (tap water), ND to 0.259 mg/L (surface water), ND to 0.791 mg/L (groundwater), and ND to 123.15 µg/L (bottled water). Arsenic (As) concentrations ranged from ND to 692 µg/L from different sources, with the highest concentration from groundwater. Collectively, these patterns underscore the need for strengthened monitoring frameworks, improved water treatment technologies, and integrated pollution-prevention strategies. Addressing heavy metal contamination in drinking water requires coordinated policy approach and continuous monitoring to reduce human exposure and safeguard global public health.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. This review aims to synthesize the contemporary literature (2018–2026) on various diagnostic approaches of PCa for clinicians. Currently, the standard approach to PCa diagnosis includes (1) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, (2) its derivatives, and (3) digital rectal examination (DRE). This approach is readily available and cost-effective but lacks specificity, thus resulting in a high incidence of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of PCa patients. This review aims to compare the traditional approaches with the newly developed approaches to PCa diagnosis and investigate their suitability for research purposes, including urine-based markers, liquid biopsy, and histopathology. Each of these approaches has advantages and disadvantages. Advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are helpful in the localization of PCa and can prevent unnecessary biopsies. Histopathology remains the gold standard in the confirmation of PCa diagnosis. Newly developed blood-based markers and advanced imaging techniques are more sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of PCa and are likely to result in a better clinical outcome than the traditional approaches. However, the cost of these approaches remains a global challenge in developing and developed countries alike. PCa diagnosis tools and strategies are presented in a clinical and cost-effective manner and are integrated in a tiered approach with the aim of controlling and managing PCa and its diagnosis.

Background/Objective: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause of death in the ageing male population across the globe, and trace metals have garnered much attention due to their sometimes-dual role in cellular mechanisms, as such contribute to the development and progression of prostate cancer. Methods: This review consolidates the results of case-control studies that investigated the concentrations of certain trace metals—Arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), selenium (Se), and zinc (Zn) in various biological samples. Results: There are decreased concentrations of Se and Zn and increased Cd concentrations in samples of PCa patients when compared to healthy controls. As, Hg, Ni, and Pb concentrations have proven to be insignificant. Conclusions: There are other variables to consider and limitations that need to be investigated in studies of this nature; however, the results have been consistent in that increased exposure to toxic metals such as Cd, along with a deficiency in protective essential nutrients like Zn and Se, tends to produce a prostatic environment.