Burn are diverse and complex injuries that not only have local effects but also serious systemic consequences through severe and prolonged inflammatory response. They are caused by heat, electricity, friction, chemicals, or radiation and are commonly divided into superficial, superficial partial-, deep partial- and full-thickness injuries. The severity of the burn depends mainly on the size and depth of the injury but also on location, age, and underlying systemic diseases. A prolonged and strong immune response makes major burns even worse by causing multiple systemic effects including damage to the heart, lungs, blood vessels, kidneys, and other organs. Burns that do not require surgical excision, superficial and superficial partial-thickness, follow the known progression of wound healing (inflammation, proliferation, remodeling), whilst deep partial- and full thickness injuries requiring excision and grafting do not. For these burns, intervention is required for optimal coverage, function, and cosmesis. Annually millions of people worldwide suffer from burns associated with high morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, over the past decades, burn care has significantly improved. The improvement in understanding the pathophysiology of burn injury and burn wound progression has led to developments in skin grafting, fluid resuscitation, infection control and nutrition This review article focuses on the immune and regenerative responses following burn injury. In the Introduction, we describe the epidemiology of burns and burn pathophysiology. The focus of the following chapter is on systemic responses to burn injury. Next, we define the immune response to burns introducing all the different cell types involved. Subsequently, we discuss the regenerative cell response to burns as well as some of the emerging novel treatments in the battle against burns.

Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is the standard of care for skin replacement therapy. While STSG is a well-established technique, it has several limitations at both the donor and recipient sites. Full-thickness skin column (FTSC) grafting is an alternative approach that involves the orthogonal harvesting of small skin columns containing the epidermis, dermis, and associated skin appendages. Peptides have been shown to promote wound repair through various reparative and regenerative mechanisms. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the extent to which FTSCs and the matrix-derived peptide TSN6, individually or in combination, influenced the rate and quality of healing, as assessed by metrics such as epithelialization, epithelial thickness, and the presence of adnexal structures. TSN6 peptide and its scrambled form was synthetized in a laboratory and mixed with a carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) hydrogel. Up to 16 standardized full-thickness excisional wounds (∅ 5 cm) were created on the dorsum of two anesthetized pigs. FTSC biopsies (∅ 1.5 mm) were harvested from donor sites located on the rump of the pig at a ratio of up to eight 1.5 mm-diameter skin columns/1 cm². Subsequently, the wounds were randomized to receive either (1) FTSC + TSN6, (2) FTSC + scrambled peptide, (3) FTSC alone, and (4) blank CMC hydrogel. Healing was monitored for 14 or 28 days. After euthanasia, the wounds were excised and processed for histology. Additionally, non-invasive imaging systems were utilized to assess wound healing. By day 14, wounds treated with FTSC or FTSC + TSN6 were significantly more re-epithelialized compared to those treated with blank CMC hydrogel. By day 28, all FTSC-transplanted wounds were fully re-epithelialized. Notably, wounds treated with FTSC + TSN6 exhibited improved healing quality, characterized by a thicker neo-epidermis and increased rete ridges at day 28 post-transplantation. All FTSC-transplanted wounds healed better than the untransplanted controls. The TSN6 peptide further improved healing quality when applied in combination with FTSCs, particularly by enhancing epidermal maturation.

From cold-weather training to deployments in high altitude and arctic conditions, frostbite injury and its sequelae remain a serious concern in military operations. Frostbite harms tissue in two distinct ways. The first involves ice crystal formation within tissue, resulting in mechanical damage and ischemia. The second occurs secondary to the inflammatory and prothrombotic state caused by reperfusion from rewarming frozen tissue. Frostbite injuries can be classified in a number of ways, but no perfect system exists. Initial work-up and diagnosis are primarily clinical. However, in equipped treatment facilities, advanced imaging modalities such as technetium-⁹⁹m (⁹⁹mTc) bone scintigraphy, magnetic resonance angiography, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), and more can play a role in diagnosis and treatment. In resource-constrained environments, such as the deployed setting, management should involve an algorithmic approach. After concurrent hypothermia and/or trauma have been evaluated for and treated, active rewarming should take place so long as there is no risk of refreezing. During re-warming, surgical consultation and evacuation considerations should be considered. Once evacuated to a definitive treatment facility, thrombolytic as well as other therapies may be indicated. Unless there is evidence of severe damage or infection, surgical management is typically delayed until injury margins are fully demarcated. Longer-term prognosis is dependent on severity, with deeper injuries often resulting in longer hospital stays, more amputations, and chronic disability. Looking forward, future frostbite research should aim to bridge field and hospital care with the goal of minimizing tissue loss and accelerating functional recovery.