To investigate how the two main electronic (e-) cigarette solvents—propylene glycol (PG) and glycerol (GL)—modulate the formation of toxic volatile carbonyl compounds under precisely controlled temperatures in the absence of nicotine and flavor additives. PG, GL, PG:GL = 1:1 (wt/wt) mixture, and two commercial e-cigarette liquids were vaporized in a stainless steel, tubular reactor in flowing air ranging up to 318°C to simulate e-cigarette vaping. Aerosols were collected and analyzed to quantify the amount of volatile carbonyls produced with each of the five e-liquids. Significant amounts of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were detected at reactor temperatures ≥215°C for both PG and GL. Acrolein was observed only in e-liquids containing GL when reactor temperatures exceeded 270°C. At 318°C, 2.03±0.80 μg of formaldehyde, 2.35±0.87 μg of acetaldehyde, and a trace amount of acetone were generated per milligram of PG; at the same temperature, 21.1±3.80 μg of formaldehyde, 2.40±0.99 μg of acetaldehyde, and 0.80±0.50 μg of acrolein were detected per milligram of GL. We developed a device-independent test method to investigate carbonyl emissions from different e-cigarette liquids under precisely controlled temperatures. PG and GL were identified to be the main sources of toxic carbonyl compounds from e-cigarette use. GL produced much more formaldehyde than PG. Besides formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, measurable amounts of acrolein were also detected at ≥270°C but only when GL was present in the e-liquid. At 215°C, the estimated daily exposure to formaldehyde from e-cigarettes, exceeded United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) acceptable limits, which emphasized the need to further examine the potential cancer and non-cancer health risks associated with e-cigarette use.

With electronic (e)-liquids containing cannabis components easily available, many anecdotal examples of cannabis vaping using electronic cigarette devices have been reported. For electronic cigarette cannabis vaping, there are potential risks of secondary indoor air pollution from vapers. However, quantitative and accurate prediction of the inhalation and dermal exposure of a passive smoker in the same room is difficult to achieve due to the ethical constraints on subject experiments. The numerical method, i.e., in silico method, is a powerful tool to complement these experiments with real humans. In this study, we adopted a computer-simulated person that has been validated from multiple perspectives for prediction accuracy. We then conducted an in silico study to elucidate secondary indoor air pollution and passive smoking associated with cannabis vaping using an electronic cigarette device in an indoor environment. The aerosols exhaled by a cannabis vaper were confirmed to be a secondary emission source in an indoor environment; non-smokers were exposed to these aerosols via respiratory and dermal pathways. Tetrahydrocannabinol was used as a model chemical compound for the exposure study. Its uptake by the non-smoker through inhalation and dermal exposure under a worst-case scenario was estimated to be 5.9% and 2.6% of the exhaled quantity from an e-cigarette cannabis user, respectively.

This study focuses on the impact of wildfire smoke emissions on regional, urban air quality during a wildfire event. We measured volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) in the San Francisco Bay Area to assess air quality during a wildfire event and compared them to those in a later non-wildfire period. VOCs were collected using thermal desorption tubes and quantified using thermal desorption-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TD-GC/MS). Elevated concentrations of VOCs such as 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (0.33 ± 0.01 µg/m³), benzene (1.03 ± 0.02 µg/m³), toluene (2.15 ± 0.04 µg/m³), ethylbenzene (0.60 ± 0.02 µg/m³), and m, p-xylene (0.77 ± 0.07 µg/m³) were observed in the wildfire event. Compared with that in the non-wildfire season, the toluene concentration during the wildfire period was more than three times the non-wildfire concentration. Similarly, the benzene concentration during the wildfire was almost four times higher, and that of p, m-xylene was three times higher. The higher wildfire levels were statistically significant for sec-butylbenzene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, n-propylbenzene, o-xylene, styrene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and p,m-xylene (p < 0.00001). These higher VOC levels compared with those for the non-fire period may potentially pose a public health concern. Open face passive sampler (OFPS)-collected PM was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) and revealed organic carbon tar balls. The highest daily average beta-attenuation-monitored PM_2.5 during the fire period was 200 µg/m³ and the highest hourly average was 270 µg/m³. Monitoring gas phase species in addition to PM concentrations is useful during wildfire season to inform public health guidance.

The use of electronic vaping products (EVPs) containing nicotine, marijuana, and/or other substances remains prominent among youth; with EVPs containing nicotine being the most commonly used tobacco product among youth since 2014. However, a detailed understanding of the chemical composition of these products is limited. During February 25^th–March 15^th, 2019, a total of 576 EVPs, including 233 e-cigarette devices (with 43 disposable vape pens) and 343 e-liquid cartridges/pods/bottled e-liquids, were found or confiscated from a convenience sample of 16 public high schools in California. Liquids inside 251 vape pens and cartridges/pods/bottled e-liquids were analyzed using a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). For comparison, new JUUL pods, the most commonly used e-cigarette among youth during 2018-2019, with different flavorings and nicotine content were purchased and analyzed. For e-cigarette cartridges/pods/bottled e-liquids, nicotine was detected in 204 of 208 (98.1%) samples. Propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerin (VG) were dominant solvents in nicotine-containing EVPs. Among 43 disposable vape pen devices, cannabinoids such as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or cannabidiol (CBD) were identified in 39 of 43 (90.1%) samples, of which 3 contained both nicotine and THC. Differences in chemical compositions were observed between confiscated or collected JUULs and purchased JUULs. Measured nicotine was inconsistent with labels on some confiscated or collected bottled e-liquids. EVPs from 16 participating schools were found to widely contain substances with known adverse health effects among youth, including nicotine and cannabinoids. There was inconsistency between labeled and measured nicotine on the products from schools. This study measured the main chemical compositions of EVPs found at 16 California public high schools. Continued efforts are warranted, including at the school-level, to educate, prevent and reduce youth use of EVPs.

Introduction: Ultrasonic vaping devices like SURGE are marketed as safer alternatives to conventional coil-based electronic cigarettes like JUUL due to their lower operating temperatures. However, their impact on cardiovascular health has not been fully characterized. Methods: Sprague–Dawley rats were exposed daily for 9 weeks to aerosol generated from SURGE, JUUL, or clean air. Heart rate variability was continuously monitored via implanted telemetry. Cardiac fibrosis was quantified using histological analysis. Temperature profiles of SURGE, JUUL, and Nautilus (a coil-based tank device) were recorded. Aerosol samples were analyzed for carbonyl compounds using high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: Both SURGE and JUUL exposures significantly reduced heart rate variability (high frequency and total power) compared with air. JUUL exposure significantly increased cardiac fibrosis; SURGE showed a similar mean fibrosis level but greater variability, resulting in a non-significant difference. SURGE devices operated at lower peak temperatures (~131°C) than JUUL (~239°C) and Nautilus (~160–170°C). Despite having the lowest temperature, SURGE emitted higher levels of carbonyl compounds than JUUL, although still substantially lower than Nautilus. Conclusions: Although SURGE operates without coils and at lower temperatures than coiled vaping devices, it generates higher levels of carbonyls than some coiled devices and impairs cardiac autonomic regulation, and it can cause cardiac fibrosis comparable with JUUL although with high variability; that is, SURGE does not reliably avoid the increase in fibrosis caused by conventional electronic cigarettes. These findings suggest that non-thermal mechanisms predominate in mediating cardiovascular toxicity associated with ultrasonic vaping, challenging the assumption that coil-free designs are inherently safer. Implications: Despite its lower operating temperature and coil-free design, the SURGE ultrasonic vaping device impaired cardiac autonomic function and promoted fibrosis at a mean level comparable to that of JUUL. These findings challenge claims of reduced harm from coil-less vaping technologies and suggest that non-thermal mechanisms may drive toxicity. Regulatory evaluations should consider device emissions and physiological outcomes—not just hardware features. Physicians and policymakers should be aware that coil-less systems may still pose cardiovascular risks, and marketing these devices as inherently safer may mislead users and undermine tobacco harm reduction efforts.