Microneedle, as a novel drug delivery system, has attracted widespread attention due to its non-invasiveness, painless and simple administration, controllable drug delivery, and diverse cargo loading capacity. Although microneedles are initially designed to penetrate stratum corneum of skin for transdermal drug delivery, they, recently, have been used to promote wound healing and regeneration of diverse tissues and organs and the results are promising. Despite there are reviews about microneedles, few of them focus on wound healing and tissue regeneration. Here, we review the recent advances of microneedles in this field. We first give an overview of microneedle system in terms of its potential cargos (e.g., small molecules, macromolecules, nucleic acids, nanoparticles, extracellular vesicle, cells), structural designs (e.g., multidrug structures, adhesive structures), material selection, and drug release mechanisms. Then we briefly summarize different microneedle fabrication methods, including their advantages and limitations. We finally summarize the recent progress of microneedle-assisted wound healing and tissue regeneration (e.g., skin, cardiac, bone, tendon, ocular, vascular, oral, hair, spinal cord, and uterine tissues). We expect that our article would serve as a guideline for readers to design their microneedle systems according to different applications, including material selection, drug selection, and structure design, for achieving better healing and regeneration efficacy.

A prospective study on the comparison of the clinical efficacy and patient's acceptance of the 2 orthotic management methods. To compare the treatment effectiveness and patients' acceptance of the flexible spinal orthosis, SpineCor with that of the rigid spinal orthosis for the patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The patients' acceptance to the rigid spinal orthoses is always a concern as it could greatly affect the clinical outcome. SpineCor is a relatively new design for tackling those inevitable drawbacks found in rigid orthosis. However, there was no study to compare this design with the conventional method regarding their treatment efficacy and the patient's acceptance. Forty-three subjects with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were randomly assigned to the SpineCor group (S group, n = 22) and rigid orthosis group (R group, n = 21). Their survival rate in the first 45 months of intervention was studied. The subjects' acceptance to the orthoses was evaluated by a purpose-designed questionnaire, which was administered in the 3rd, 9th, and 18th months of intervention. In the study period, there were 68% of the subjects in the S group and 95% of the subjects in the R group did not show curve progression. Significant difference (P = 0.046, by Fisher exact test) in failure rate between the 2 subject groups was found although the 2 groups had similar responses to the questionnaire. The current study showed that the failure rate of the SpineCor was significantly higher than that of the rigid spinal orthosis, and the patients' acceptance to the SpineCor was comparable to the conventional rigid spinal orthosis.

It has been proposed that in-brace correction is the best guideline for prediction of the results of brace treatment for patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). However, bracing may be a stressful experience for patients and bracing non-compliance could be psychologically related. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between brace compliance, in-brace correction and QoL of patients with AIS.

In this prospective study, the effectiveness and biomechanical factors of spinal orthoses in the treatment of moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients were investigated. In the first...

The treatment effectiveness of the CAD/CAM method and the manual method in managing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was compared. Forty subjects were recruited with twenty subjects for each m...